1 / 24

Comprehensive Review & Preparation for ISDR System Implementation

Discussing work modalities for implementing the Hyogo Framework, defining responsibilities, setting objectives, and facilitating joint work programs. Focus on clear accountability and effective support.

shepardc
Download Presentation

Comprehensive Review & Preparation for ISDR System Implementation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Agenda item 4:Work modalities of the revised ISDR system to support the implementation of Hyogo Framework- Elements to be reviewed in groups- & prepare for decisionWorkdoc3 www.unisdr.org

  2. IATF/DR to adopt a process and prepare for the new system • Expected outcome: Roadmap for first Global Platform & a mechanism to prepare first work-programme for the ISDR system • Three groups to define framework & scope of • Integrated work-programme; • reporting on progress; and • clusters-thematic work (responsibilities and accountability)

  3. Annex 3: Clustering • Based on matrix and Hyogo Framework priorities • Organization & action of clusters, thematic groups/platforms. Use existing inter-agency mechanisms when applicable. • Based on what themes/tasks? How should they work, management mechanisms? • Clearer distribution of responsibilities, accountability • Support setting of objectives, work-programming, identify gaps and coordinate reporting on progress • Usefulness and role of convening/lead agency

  4. Suggested tasks, initial division annex 3 “Thematic clustering - for discussion • Launch process for first “cluster planning”- time frames and definition of work priorities Expected outcome: Agreement on process and initial thematic clustering

  5. Annex 1: Integrated work-programming(proposal based on UNAIDS experience) Goal: • Coordinated & effective support, & coherence, for implementation of the Hyogo Framework • Strive for increased national capacities and benefits • Benefits must be clear / costs minimized

  6. ISDR System implementation(coming out of the ISDR stakeholder workshop) • “Blueprint” of the system • Roles / contributions • Expected results • “Fuelling” the system • Requirements • Sources • “Monitoring” the system • Management • Feedback / corrections

  7. ISDR System implementation • “Blueprint” • “Fuelling” • “Monitoring” Joint Workplan Resources (all) GovernancemanagementM & E

  8. Hyogo Framework Outcomes: * National priority & institutions * Risk assessment & warning * Knowledge * Reduction in risk factors * Strengthened preparedness • Actors: • * Governments • * Regional bodies • * UN • Civil Society • * Business • * Academia Impact: * Lives * Livelihoods * Infrastructure * Environment

  9. Workplanning Scope (tbd) • ISDR secretariat • UN Agencies at global & regional levels • ISDR System Infrastructure • Thematic (clusters), regional, strengthened RC capacity • UN Country Programmes (alt.) • National priority setting support (alt.)

  10. Result-based approach

  11. Including bilateral support

  12. Including bilateral support

  13. Governance, Management, Monitoring & Evaluation • Preparation of work-programme (clusters, PAC) • Approval of work-programme (Global Platform) • Approval of budget (MOB) • Monitoring & revisions of workprogramme implementation • Evaluation • Reporting

  14. Pending: Trust Fund Option 1

  15. Trust fund Option 2

  16. ISDR Trust Fund - Under discussion Management oversight board * Joint workprogramme Progamme advisory committee Supplemental & agencies own funds Donors Trust fund

  17. To be discussed • Level of workplan/s- usefulness and needs? Scope of the system (consolidated or network) • What should be the scope: actors, geographic, time scale? • Should the workplan be results-based and costed? Or only define joint objectives? • Use of ISDR trust fund? Funding the ISDR “infrastructure” (secretariat, platforms etc.)? Country programmes?

  18. Annex 2: A common progress reporting process • Strive for expanded understanding, national leadership, and motivate self-directed reporting by entities involved • Success determined by engagement & achievements of actors at all levels (national, regional international): link to existing reporting mechanisms as much as possible • Linked to objectives and expected results (indicators)

  19. Current efforts- towards common reporting • Compilation of Matrix of Commitments and Initiatives- implementation HFA • On-going discussions with experts for guiding identification of benchmarks and indicators • Consolidated report/s: SG report to UNGA, & posting on website of source material: national, regional, international. Use of web-bsed Infromation Platform • Prepare for periodic review (timeframes?): Living with Risk format

  20. Modalities • National reporting (voluntary): core element • Engage with national platforms/systems, existing related reporting (sust dev, climate change, poverty reduction, health) • UN RC system and country teams • Regional bodies to support countries and regional reviews • Global reporting: draw from the above- consolidate by clusters, include resource allocation for DRR

  21. To discuss • Modalities for common reporting- part of cluster responsibilities. • Existing reporting mechanisms and links to common reporting on HFA • Group of IATF to develop reporting guidelines • Follow-up steps

More Related