1 / 33

Perpetual Pavements Concept and History

Perpetual Pavements Concept and History. Iowa Open House October 5, 2005. www. AsphaltAlliance .com. }. 40-75 mm SMA, OGFC or Superpave. 100 mm to 150 mm. Zone Of High Compression. High Modulus Rut Resistant Material (Varies As Needed).

shepry
Download Presentation

Perpetual Pavements Concept and History

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Perpetual Pavements Concept and History Iowa Open House October 5, 2005 www.AsphaltAlliance.com

  2. } 40-75 mm SMA, OGFC or Superpave 100 mm to 150 mm Zone Of High Compression High Modulus Rut Resistant Material (Varies As Needed) Flexible Fatigue Resistant Material 75 - 100 mm Max Tensile Strain Pavement Foundation

  3. Value • Quality . . . is what the customer gets out [of a product] and is willing to pay for. A product is not quality because it is hard to make and costs a lot of money . . . This is incompetence. Customers pay only for what is of use to them and gives them value. Nothing else constitutes quality. • Peter Drucker

  4. Economics Total Costs Alternative Perpetual Pavement Time

  5. Lower Life Cycle Cost Better Use of Resources Low Incremental Costs for Surface Renewal Lower User Delay Cost Shorter Work Zone Periods Off-Peak Period Construction Why are Perpetual Pavements Important?

  6. Design

  7. Under ESAL Limit Bending to < 65me (Monismith, Von Quintus, Nunn, Thompson) Limit Vertical Compression to < 200me (Monismith, Nunn) Mechanistic Performance Criteria Thick HMA (> 200 mm) Base (as required) Subgrade

  8. Fatigue Resistant Asphalt Base • Minimize Tensile Strain with Pavement Thickness • Thicker Asphalt Pavement = Lower Strain • Strain Below Fatigue Limit = Indefinite Life Compressive Strain Indefinite Fatigue Life Strain Fatigue Life Tensile Strain

  9. PerRoad

  10. 1000 100 Rate of rutting (mm/msa) 10 1 0.1 0 100 200 300 400 Thickness of bituminous layer (mm) RATE OF RUTTING vs ASPHALT THICKNESS TRL

  11. 500 TRL Design Chart DBM DBM50 HDM 400 300 Thickness of asphalt layers (mm) 200 100 0 10 100 TRL Design life (msa)

  12. Perpetual Pavement versus Conventional Design AASHTO PerRoad

  13. Construction

  14. 25 20 15 Subgrade, inches Required Thickness Above 10 5 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 CBR Foundation - Illinois No remedial procedure required Remedial procedure required Remedial procedure optional

  15. Mass Rod Reference

  16. Compaction Support Weak Support Leads to Poor Compaction! Weak!!!

  17. Compaction Support Strong Support Helps Compaction! Strong!!!

  18. 30OF Surface, 40OF Air Temperature, 15 mph wind

  19. Performance

  20. Statistic Time Since Original Construction (years) Thickness of Original AC (mm (in.)) Time from Original Construction to First Resurfacing (years) Average 31.6 230 (9.2) 12.4 Range 23 to 39 100 to 345 2 to 25 Performance of Washington Interstate Flexible Pavements (based on 284 km)

  21. Examined Performance on 4 Interstate Routes HMA Pavements - Up to 34 Years without Rehabilitation or Reconstruction “No significant quantity of work . . . for structural repair or to maintain drainage of the flexible pavements.” Only small incremental increases in Present Cost for HMA pavements. Ohio Study of Flexible Pavements

  22. Data from GPS-6 (FHWA-RD-00-165) Conclusions Most AC Overlays > 15 years before Rehab Many AC Overlays > 20 years before Significant Distress Thicker overlays mean less: Fatigue Cracking Transverse Cracking Longitudinal Cracking FHWA - Data from Long-Term Pavement Performance Study

  23. Rehabilitation • Possible Distresses • Top-Down Fatigue • Thermal Cracking • Raveling • Solutions • Mill & Fill • Thin Overlay High Quality SMA, OGFC or Superpave { 50 - 100 mm 20+ Years Later Structure Remains Intact

  24. Important to consider Initial Costs Rehabilitation and Maintenance Costs Reconstruction costs Should break costs into Agency costs User Costs Life Cycle Costs Time

  25. 50 year design 1 mile, 2 Lane, 12 ft lanes Traffic: 5000 ADT (Rural Setting) Design Comparison – Low Volume 6” HMA Perpetual ($360,000) Conventional ($230,000) 12” Granular Base 3” HMA 6” Granular Base Subgrade Muench, et al., 2004

  26. Conventional Design (3” HMA/6” GB) 1.75” Overlay in years 6, 15, 31 and 40 Rebuild at 25 years Perpetual Design (6” HMA/12” GB) 1.75” overlay every 13 years Values based on WSDOT Experience Rehabilitation Schedule Muench, et al., 2004

  27. Used LCCA Software Considered variability of inputs User delay not significant Cost Analysis Muench, et al., 2004

  28. What About User Delay Costs?

  29. 4-lane 40,000 AADT LCCA Software Delay calculations based on Highway Capacity Manual Compare work-zone alternatives 24 hour closure 20 hour closure 11 hour closure WZ User Cost Comparison

  30. 85% of cost is waiting to move through WZ Option 1 – 24 Hr Closure Cost/mile/day$116,000

  31. Option 2 – 20 Hr Closure Cost/mile/day$42,000

  32. No stopping! Option 3 – 11 Hr Closure Cost/mile/day$12,000

  33. Structure Lasts 50+ years. Bottom-Up Design and Construction Indefinite Fatigue Life Renewable Pavement Surface. High Rutting Resistance Tailored for Specific Application Consistent, Smooth and Safe Driving Surface. Environmentally Friendly Avoids Costly Reconstruction. Perpetual Pavement www.AsphaltAlliance.com

More Related