230 likes | 381 Views
Team 10. February 14 th Sophia Antipolis, France. INTRODUCTION. Contents: Team presentation Study Area Modeling Conclusion. Team presentation. Study area. Modelling. Conclusion. Friedrich Johannes Koch. ♦ Nationality : German ♦ Major: Hydro Informatics and Water managment
E N D
Team 10 February 14 th Sophia Antipolis, France
INTRODUCTION Contents: Team presentation Study Area Modeling Conclusion
Team presentation Study area Modelling Conclusion • Friedrich Johannes Koch • ♦ Nationality: German • ♦ Major: Hydro Informatics and Water • managment • ♦ Skills : Hydrology / Hydrodynamics / Geomatics...
Team presentation Study area Modelling Conclusion • Katja Schadewald • ♦ Nationality: German • ♦ Major: Geotechnology • ♦ Skills : Hydrology / Hydrogeology / Geophysics /…
Team presentation Study area Modelling Conclusion • UpalMahamud • ♦ Nationality: Bangledeshi • ♦ Major: Hydro Informatics and Water • management • ♦ Skills : Coastal engineering / Hydrodynamics /Hydro-informatics
Team presentation Study area Modelling Conclusion • Julien Chanet • ♦ Nationality: French • ♦ Major: Hydro Informatics and Water • management
Team presentation Study area Modelling Conclusion • Jean Girard • ♦ Nationality: French • ♦ Major: Hydro Informatics and Water • management • ♦ Skills : Hydraulics / Industrial design / Water law
Team presentation Study area Modelling Conclusion • Phuc Thuan Thai • ♦ Nationality: Vietnamese • ♦ Major: Hydro Informatics and Water • management • ♦ Skills : Hydraulics / Industrial design / Water law
Team presentation Study area Modelling Conclusion • NgocDuong VO • ♦ Nationality: Vietnamese • ♦ Major: Hydro Informatics and Water • managment • ♦ Skills : Hydrography, Structure of irrigation work and dam
Team presentation Study area Modelling Conclusion • Chris Parker • ♦ Nationality: England • ♦ Major: Hydrology and Climate Change • ♦ Skills : Catchment Hydrology, Hydrosystems Processes, Climate Change
Team presentation Study area Modelling Conclusion • Hyeongjun Han • ♦ Nationality: Korean • ♦ Major: Hydro Informatics and Water • management
Team presentation Study area Modelling Conclusion • HyundlaeRoh • ♦ Nationality: Korean • ♦ Major: Hydro Informatics and Water • managment
Team presentation Study area Modelling Conclusion • Marton Balint • ♦ Nationality: Hungary • ♦ Major: Hydro Informatics and Water • management • ♦ Skills : Hydraulics / Industrial design
Team presentation Study area Modeling Conclusion Var river catchment The Var catchment has an area of about 2822 km2 and elevation from 3000 m in the mountains to 0 m at the mouth to the Mediterranean Sea. The length of the river is about 125 km.
Team presentation Study area Modelling Conclusion Var river catchment Tinnee~750 km2 Tinnee Upper Var~1100 km2 Vesubie Upper Var Upper Var Vesubie~400 km2 Esteron Esteron~450 km2 Lower Var Lower Var~160km2
Team presentation Study area Modelling Conclusion GIS modeling WeuseArcGISto accomplishthefollowing objectives: - Obtain a georeferenced topography of the catchment - Watershed analysis, such as flow direction, flow accumulation, stream delineation and identification of subcatchments - Slope calculations - Land use analysis
Team presentation Study area Modelling Conclusion GIS modeling • Initial datahttp://www.hydroeurope.org/page1601.html • –topo075.txt • –topo300.txt • –landuse_legend.txt • - landuse.asc
Team presentation Study area Modelling Conclusion MIKE SHE • Setting up a simple model for rainfall-runoff modeling on the Var catchment • The model will only incorporate the overland flow part of the water cycle • At first, only a small part of the river network was be included (next to the outlet – in order to record the discharge generated by the model) (Part I) • Then, the whole river network will be included (Part II)
Team presentation Study area Modelling Conclusion MIKE SHE
Team presentation Study area Modelling Conclusion 1D Modeling – HecRas and Mike 11 • Hydraulic modeling of lower Var river and simulation for the flood of November 1994 • Calibrate ISIS model for the Var low valley in respect to measured water levels at weirs.
Team presentation Study area Modelling Conclusion 2D Modeling Mike 21 • Check validity of results using measured water levels at weirs and comparison of hydrographs at Napoleon II bridge • Checking the influence of the tidal effect along the river and estimate how far the influence reaches.
Team presentation Study area Modelling Conclusion WORK PLAN
Team presentation Study area Modelling Conclusion Team 10 February 14 th 2011 Sophia Antipolis, France Thankyou for your attention !