50 likes | 168 Views
“Moving Towards Sustainable Local NGOs in South Africa: FHI 360 UGM Experiences ” Presenter: Simon Leballo. Introduction & Overview. Umbrella Grants Management (UGM) Program Award Period: October 1, 2007 – March 31, 2013 Funding ceiling: USD$91 million Location : South Africa
E N D
“Moving Towards Sustainable Local NGOs in South Africa: FHI 360 UGM Experiences” Presenter: Simon Leballo
Introduction & Overview • Umbrella Grants Management (UGM) Program • Award Period: October 1, 2007 – March 31, 2013 • Funding ceiling: USD$91 million • Location: South Africa • Goal: To support the provision of sustainable, high-quality HIV/AIDS services in South Africa through strategic grants management and CB support to implementing partners. • Partners: 13 organisations over life of the project (10 SA, 3 international, 8 active in year 5
Capacity Building Operating Model:Umbrella Approach Capacity building approach includes: • Core, Cohort and Customized training • Mentoring and Twinning • Educational Training Fund (ETF) • Technical Assistance, including onsite and virtual support UGM identifies specific organizational development needs and addresses them with customized action plans in 10 specialized domains.
Unique Characteristics of the Umbrella Model • Provision of grant funding allowed stronger financial compliance which leads to improved financial systems • Annual CB assessments and joint action planning allowed partners to define areas for improvement and CB priorities • Emphasis on governance and strategic management CB led to greater Board engagement and strategic planning • Engagement in partner reporting led to significantly improved MER systems • CB workshops increased partner networking, information sharing and collaboration
Challenges of the Umbrella Model • Partners had difficulty absorbing and managing PEPFAR funding (UGM had no role in determining partner funding levels ) • Lack of ‘graduation’ criteria led to confusion about the ultimate goal of the CB partnership and when it was reached • Emphasis on program and financial reporting in alignment with USAID rules led to a reliance on external experts for TA • Financial mismanagement by a few partners interrupted program implementation and resulted in projects ending prematurely. • Sustainability of activities and funding post-UGM is challenging