1 / 22

Contingency theory

Contingency theory. Created 1964 Group Wiki http://contingency4.wikispaces.com/. Contingency Theory. Team Members Sandi Peggy Missy Jane. Agenda. Show you the contingency theory Tell you all you ever wanted to know about the contingency theory

shlomo
Download Presentation

Contingency theory

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Contingency theory Created 1964 Group Wiki http://contingency4.wikispaces.com/

  2. Contingency Theory Team Members Sandi Peggy Missy Jane

  3. Agenda • Show you the contingency theory • Tell you all you ever wanted to know about the contingency theory • Involve you with the contingency theory by allowing you watch some amazing acting and then evaluate the skills of those leader (or actors) • In conclusion, we will answer any questions

  4. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lm3L98_l0Uk

  5. Contingency Theory • Definition of the word “Contingency” • Unforeseen event • Emergency • Incident • Possibility • Eventuality • When, during the course of our working day, do we have a contingent event occur?

  6. Contingency Theory • In short, contingency theory has 2 concerns: • STYLES of Leadership • And • SITUATIONS of organizations • How well does the leader’s style fit the CONTEXT? (Northouse, page 113).

  7. Model of theory

  8. Contingency Theory • In Contingency Theory, Leadership styles are described as • Task motivated: reaching a goal • Or • Relationship motivated: developing close interpersonal relationships

  9. Contingency Theory • Strengths of theory • A quick reminder from (Pfeffer, 1997) • “There is no one best way and any way is not the answer to understand the dynamic reality of complex organizations”.

  10. Contingency Theory • Some Strengths of Theory • One of the most widely researched • Studies with sound methodology support theory • Forces us to consider situations of leaders • Predictive using contextual data • Matches leader to situation; not vice versa • Provides useful data about leadership styles

  11. Contingency Theory • Criticisms of theory • Fiedler argued that if a leader and a situation do not match, ‘engineer’ the job to fit leader (poses doubt) • Controversial • Does not examine leadership over time; a snapshot view (no continuum) • Difficult to operationalize and measure personality constructs

  12. Contingency Theory • More criticisms: • Looks at contingency variables not as independent variables • Inconclusive and conflicting results to validate the LPC scale • Predictive model but the LPC is not clearly defined • Fails to explain why certain leaders are better in certain situations than others

  13. Contingency Theory • More criticisms: • Difficult to understand how rating on LPC scale reflects leadership style • LPC directions are unclear • Cumbersome scale because it measures four factors to determine if leader is good for environment

  14. Contingency Theory

  15. Contingency Theory • Role Play One • Survey One Least Preferred Co-Worker • Role Play Two • Survey Two Least Preferred Co-Worker • Role Play Three • Survey Three Least Preferred Co-Worker • Results of Three Surveys • Discussion

  16. Role Play 1 • Summary and Wiki Link

  17. Role Play 2 • Summary and Wiki Link

  18. ROLE Play 3 • Summary and Wiki Link

  19. Applications • How you place leaders for greatest effectiveness • Rotation of leadership to maintain effectiveness • Leadership training- to use or not to use? • Reengineering of an organization • Short term vs. long-term needs of an organization • How group diversity changes leadership dynamics

  20. Applications • K-12 • Principal matches in elementary vs. secondary situations • Student commitment vs. strategic leadership • Higher Education • Advising student groups • Leading leaders in mid an senior level management positions • Crisis management

  21. SUMMARY • Back to “Desperate Housewives” • Questions???

  22. References • Fiedler, F. E., & Chemers, M. M. (1974). Leadership and effective management. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company. • Fiedler, F. E., Chemers, M. M., & Mahar, L. (1977). Improving leadership effectiveness: The leader match concept. New York: Wiley. • Fiedler, F. E., & Mahar, L. (1979). The effectiveness of contingency model training: A review of the validation of leader match. Personnel Psychology, 32, 45-62. • Kennedy, J. K., Jr., Houston, J. M., Korsgaard, M. A. & Gallo, D. D. (1987). Education and Psychological Measurement, 47, 807-814. • Northouse, P. G. (2007). Leadership: Theory and practice. London: Sage Publications. • Saha, S. K. (1979). Contingency theories of leadership: A study. Human Relations, 32, 313-322. • Vroom, V. H., & Jago, A. G. (2007). The role of the situation in leadership. American Psychologist, 62,17-24.

More Related