1 / 13

the impact of migration and the refugee crisis on social protection systems

the impact of migration and the refugee crisis on social protection systems. Our Experience . Churches and social organisations active at local/regional and national level

showalter
Download Presentation

the impact of migration and the refugee crisis on social protection systems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. the impact of migration and the refugee crisis on social protection systems Eurodiaconia

  2. Our Experience • Churches and social organisations active at local/regional and national level • Engaged in reception and short term humanitarian assistance as well as mid to long term inclusion and integration activities • Working with document and undocumented migrants, refugees and asylum seekers • Able to share concrete feedback from Germany, Serbia, Greece, Italy, Hungary, Netherlands, Sweden, Denmark, Slovakia, Spain and France • This is not a new subject for us at EU level – already in 2013 we held a joint event with PICUM on Inclusion and Exclusion and in 2014 published a report on access to social and health services for migrants in Europe. Eurodiaconia

  3. Experience • Not a new area of work for our members either but the scale and speed of arrivals has been the change with the result: • Unpreparedness – communities, ngos and local authorities, governments and public administration (and EU) • Lack of funds to provide the services needed immediately • No real planning and a lack of co-ordination • Public authorities abdicating responsibility to NGO’s – lack of accountability and partnership • Positive – where there were existing partnerships they have been used to set up new services • Once a commitment has been made to set up services and an economic commitment made by a public administration it has been respected (Italy) • Strong initial public support – but will it last? Eurodiaconia

  4. Initial actions • Reception services • Food • Shelter • Assistance with registrations • Adaptation/counselling • Connecting to local communities What else is needed immediately? • Find ways for migrants to use their skills and abilities immediately to aid integration • Language courses Eurodiaconia

  5. Initial concerns • Concerns • Fundamental rights and humanitarian standards being disregarded • Reduction of quality standards for social services • Misunderstanding of what is and is not allowed • Officious bureaucracy of public administration (toilets!!) • Lack of appropriate infrastructure to even start the reception process (internet, equipment, people (Greece). • No funding available upfront – retrospective funding puts huge constraints on local organisations • Need to upgrade some facilities for them to be usable for the influx of people who have come and are still to come • Long delays for any type of juridical/administrative decision (Germany) – affects access to social and health benefits/schools/housing/work • Accessibility of health care • No attempts really at psycho-social counselling • Dignity of peoples’ lives being used as a political weapon Eurodiaconia

  6. Medium to long term actions • Addressing xenophobia and racism • Working as mediators between authorities and people • Providing advocacy, legal advice and representation • Literacy and language courses • Vocational training • Assisting with accessing the labour market (migrants bring net benefit in the long term and pay for pensions we could not afford (Italy)) • Provision of healthcare to those excluded due to status • Secure housing • Integrated packages of social services – example from Hungary • Accommodation, training as child care assistants, achievement of qualification, six month paid employment to get experience , language lessons, social network – funded by ESF Eurodiaconia

  7. What is needed? • Financial resources • Speedier access to targeted support thanks to quicker processing of demands • Increase in social infrastructure (housing, education, community facilities, health care) • Training for staff/volunteers to work with new groups and to ensure they are well equipped in a highly pressured situation/avoid burn out • Maintenance of existing quality standards • Access to health care • Employment policies to ensure migrants/refugees and asylum seekers do not end up in low paying, low skilled jobs by default • Agreement and implementation of basic social standards in the European Union regardless of origin/legal status Eurodiaconia

  8. What is needed (2) • Increase accountability of Member states as to their social assistance • Minimization of ‘competition’ between people requiring social assistance • Policies to support those whose applications for international protection are turned down • Political reflection as to whether or not Member States already experiencing pressure on their social protection systems can absorb increased pressure and still maintain/reach adequacy of income • Encourage social spending for all people in the AGS/CSRs 2016 and onwards Eurodiaconia

  9. Funding issues • Lack of start up and retrospective funding • Some lack of clarity as to what is eligible and what is not • No long term funding (yet) - reception funding can be restricted (e.g. Italy, 6 months) • ESF funding is time bound – need sustainable programmes/longer periods • EU has to step in where national governments will not (e.g. Denmark) • The time it takes to access EU funds • The complexity of applying for AMIF or ESF funds • The need to have large scale projects rather than exploratory funds to co-ordinate, build capacity and provide immediate aid – we need ‘start up’ or ‘seed’ funding • Ongoing training for NGO’s to access EU funds • Timely information on what funds can be used (N.B. recent guide on ESF, FEAD and AIMF very helpful). Eurodiaconia

  10. Proposals • Use of left over ESF funds from 2007 – 2013 – proposal from Germany • ‘start up’ fund for NGO’s etc. to be able to provide quality services immediately • Capacity building funds for the providers of services – short term and long term • Funds for the co-ordination of actions • Funds for the upgrading of buildings and facilities Eurodiaconia

  11. What the EU can do • Gathering data (migrants participation in the labour market and/or other social inclusion programmes • Support the speeding up of targeted ESF/FEAD programmes • Targeted vocational training programmes and work on recognition of qualifications • Set up information hubs for Member States/NGO’s/migrants on what is available and what is possible re support • Straightforward information on funding possibilities and assistance to apply – it is in everyone’s interest. Eurodiaconia

  12. What the eu can do • Encourage investment in social infrastructure (use of EFSI or other funds?) • Challenge MS on unhelpful rhetoric • Engage with civil society/faith communities to have partnerships in addressing the situation • Set up a ‘starter’ fund and providing funding up front to NGO’s • Ensure consistency in social standards and rights • Challenge MS who do not allow public spending on some groups/avoid criminalisation of NGO’s • Work on anti-discrimination/xenophobia and anti-racism Eurodiaconia

  13. Long term implications • Positive • Diverse societies and potential reversal of demographic (aging) trends • Increased workforce to be net contributors to social protection and pension schemes • Potential workers in sectors that are traditionally lacking in staff • Negative • More pressure on universal and targeted social benefits • More pressure on housing and other social infrastructure • Risk of poverty already high, may well get higher and people become trapped in low paying jobs • Focus on one group at the expense of others? • Without reform and investment social infrastructure could struggle in some member states. Eurodiaconia

More Related