1 / 13

Serum sample handling

Serum sample handling. Stanford Group A Samples. Immediately freeze. Stanford Blood. Stanford Serum Samples. freeze. Stanford Group B Samples. Blood samples were allowed to clot at R.T for 1 hour, and centrifuged to get sera. Kept @ R.T for 7 days. CA State Blood. CA State Serum

sibley
Download Presentation

Serum sample handling

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Serum sample handling Stanford Group A Samples Immediately freeze Stanford Blood Stanford Serum Samples freeze Stanford Group B Samples Blood samples were allowed to clot at R.T for 1 hour, and centrifuged to get sera Kept @ R.T for 7 days CA State Blood CA State Serum Samples CA State Samples Kept @ R.T for variable length of time up to 7 days freeze

  2. 30 Total # of feature: 562 20 Density 10 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 ANOVA P value

  3. 10 Stanford Group B vs. A Stanford Group A vs. CA State Stanford Group B vs. CA State 8 6 Density 4 2 0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Tukey HSD P value between sub groups

  4. Distribution of DCV of each feature Distribution of CV of each feature 4.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 -1.0 0.0 -2.0 Stanford B – CA State Stanford Group B – A Stanford Group A – CA State Stanford Group A Stanford Group B CA State

  5. CA State Stanford Group A Stanford Group B

  6. Stanford Group A Stanford Group B Stanford Group A Stanford Group B CA State CA State 600 500 400 300 200 100 ALB – MW 66224 APOC1 – MW 6629 000 600 CO3 – MW 8125 TF – MW 78284 500 400 300 200 100 000

  7. Urine sample handling 5 X Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 1 Process 2 R.T. Process Pool 5 individual urine samples Split into 6 identical samples 3 R.T. Process 4 R.T. Process 5 R.T. Process 6 Receive FEDEX Transit Process

  8. Total # of feature: 100737 1.5 1.0 Density 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 ANOVA P value

  9. 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Day 2 vs. Day 1 Day 3 vs. Day 1 Day 4 vs. Day 1 Day 5 vs. Day 1 FEDEX vs. Day 1 Density 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Tukey HSD P value between sub groups

  10. Distribution of DCV of each feature Distribution of CV of each feature 2.0 2.0 1.5 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.5 -1.0 0.0 -2.0 Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 FEDEX Day 2 - Day 1 Day 3 - Day 1 Day 4 - Day 1 Day 5 - Day 1 FEDEX - Day 1

  11. Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 FEDEX

  12. Case study of THP peptides • THP 982.59 VLNLGPITR • THP 1047.48 SGSVIDQSRV • THP 1211.66 DQSRVLNLGPI • THP 1225.69 SRVLNLGPITR • THP 1324.76 IDQSRVLNLGPI • THP 1423.83 VIDQSRVLNLGPI • THP 1468.82 DQSRVLNLGPITR • THP 1510.87 SVIDQSRVLNLGPI • THP 1567.91 GSVIDQSRVLNLGPI • THP 1581.91 IDQSRVLNLGPITR • THP 1654.91 SGSVIDQSRVLNLGPI • THP 1680.98 VIDQSRVLNLGPITR • THP 1755.96 SGSVIDQSRVLNLGPIT • THP 1768.01 SVIDQSRVLNLGPITR • THP 1912.07 SGSVIDQSRVLNLGPITR • THP 2040.16 SGSVIDQSRVLNLGPITRK

  13. 5. 9. 13. 1. 6. 10. 14. 2. 7. 11. 15. 3. 8. 12. 16. 4.

More Related