1 / 13

Update of noise filtering in protoDUNE

Update of noise filtering in protoDUNE. Wenqiang Gu Carlos Sarasty. Undershoot correction (successful examples). Before correction. After correction RC 1.1ms. After correction RC 1.1ms. Zoom-in for the tail (RC 1.1ms – collection plane). Imperfect pole-zero cancellation.

sidneya
Download Presentation

Update of noise filtering in protoDUNE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Update of noise filtering in protoDUNE Wenqiang Gu Carlos Sarasty

  2. Undershoot correction (successful examples) Before correction After correction RC 1.1ms After correction RC 1.1ms

  3. Zoom-in for the tail (RC 1.1ms – collection plane)

  4. Imperfect pole-zero cancellation Before correction After correction RC 1.1ms After correction RC 0.2ms • Shanshan suspects the imperfect pole-zero cancellation • Is this issue (RC timing) consistent for a specific channel? • Needs a detailed study

  5. Another example After correction RC 1.1ms Doesn’t work • The tail is even shorter • Needs to check the details in pulser data • Maybe a dedicated electronics calibration? • Brian has the most experience in the MicroBooNE

  6. “50 kHz” collection plane noise • An automated filter works now • Needs a large sample for validation --- raw --- filtered

  7. Zoom-in Filtered noise • Filtered noise looks reasonable

  8. Still some fluctuation at the edge • Similar to “Gibbs phenomenon”, ringing at the discontinuity • Can we reduce the fluctuation by adding some suppression at high frequency? Sinc(k/m)  Lanczos factor

  9. By adding sinc(k/m) • A little suppression at high frequency

  10. By adding sinc( 5*k/m) • A lot of suppression here

  11. Comparison Sinc(10*k/m) No suppression at HF Sinc(5*k/m)

  12. Impact on signal • But the suppression factor also reduce the signal, not good --- no suppression --- sinc(k/m) --- sinc(5*k/m) --- sinc(10*k/m)

  13. Sticky code mitigation • Additional sticky code besides of mod64=0,1,63 for some channels, needs a detailed study Mod64 = 7

More Related