130 likes | 141 Views
Update of noise filtering in protoDUNE. Wenqiang Gu Carlos Sarasty. Undershoot correction (successful examples). Before correction. After correction RC 1.1ms. After correction RC 1.1ms. Zoom-in for the tail (RC 1.1ms – collection plane). Imperfect pole-zero cancellation.
E N D
Update of noise filtering in protoDUNE Wenqiang Gu Carlos Sarasty
Undershoot correction (successful examples) Before correction After correction RC 1.1ms After correction RC 1.1ms
Imperfect pole-zero cancellation Before correction After correction RC 1.1ms After correction RC 0.2ms • Shanshan suspects the imperfect pole-zero cancellation • Is this issue (RC timing) consistent for a specific channel? • Needs a detailed study
Another example After correction RC 1.1ms Doesn’t work • The tail is even shorter • Needs to check the details in pulser data • Maybe a dedicated electronics calibration? • Brian has the most experience in the MicroBooNE
“50 kHz” collection plane noise • An automated filter works now • Needs a large sample for validation --- raw --- filtered
Zoom-in Filtered noise • Filtered noise looks reasonable
Still some fluctuation at the edge • Similar to “Gibbs phenomenon”, ringing at the discontinuity • Can we reduce the fluctuation by adding some suppression at high frequency? Sinc(k/m) Lanczos factor
By adding sinc(k/m) • A little suppression at high frequency
By adding sinc( 5*k/m) • A lot of suppression here
Comparison Sinc(10*k/m) No suppression at HF Sinc(5*k/m)
Impact on signal • But the suppression factor also reduce the signal, not good --- no suppression --- sinc(k/m) --- sinc(5*k/m) --- sinc(10*k/m)
Sticky code mitigation • Additional sticky code besides of mod64=0,1,63 for some channels, needs a detailed study Mod64 = 7