1 / 31

Seabasing Capabilities Based Assessment Joint Capabilities Document (JCD) Brief to the JROC

Seabasing Capabilities Based Assessment Joint Capabilities Document (JCD) Brief to the JROC. Sponsored by US Navy Date 07 September 2007 LtCol Dave Robinson J-8 SAGD 697-9860. OVERALL CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED (U). Seabasing Capabilities Based Assessment

silas-bradshaw
Download Presentation

Seabasing Capabilities Based Assessment Joint Capabilities Document (JCD) Brief to the JROC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Seabasing Capabilities Based Assessment Joint Capabilities Document (JCD)Brief to the JROC Sponsored by US Navy Date 07 September 2007 LtCol Dave Robinson J-8 SAGD 697-9860 OVERALL CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED (U)

  2. Seabasing Capabilities Based Assessment Joint Capabilities Document (JCD) (U) JCIDS INFO (U) (U) DOC TYPE: JCD (U) SPONSOR: FM FCB (U) JPD: JROC Interest (U) DRIVER: CBA • SPECIFICS (U) • Recommended way ahead: • (U) JCD recommends a Joint Seabasing Analysis and Wargaming (JSAW) effort to further scope gaps, identify any new gaps, and provide a quantitative analytical base so FSA solutions are defendable in acquisition phase • (U) JCD outlines four FSAs with recommended FSA sponsors—USJFCOM and USN REQUESTED ACTION (U): Approve the JCD and recommended Seabasing way ahead • FM FCB COMMENTS (U) • (U) JCD staffing resolved 18 critical comments (none outstanding) • (U) FM FCB endorsed JCD on 20 Aug 07 • (U) FM FCB endorsed recommended way ahead • SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS (U) • (U) Seabasing JIC (approved by JROC Oct 05 ) • (U) Seabasing FAA (approved by JROC Nov 05) • (U) Seabasing FNA (approved by JROC Nov 06) RECOMMENDATION (U): Forward for paper JROC approval

  3. Seabasing Joint Capabilities Document (JCD) (U) • (U) Issues • (U) Seabasing JCD recommends a Joint Seabasing Analysis and Wargaming (JSAW) study prior to FSA to quantify capability gaps identified in the FNA • (U) JCB Position • (U) TBD • (U) Services and COCOMs positions • (U) Support JCD recommendations • (U) Requests for JROC • (U) Approve JCD • (U) Direct JSAW study • (U) Approve recommended FSA sponsors 3

  4. Aerial Port of Debarkation Aerial Port of Embarkation Joint Task Force Objective Sea Port of Debarkation Sea Port of Embarkation APOD APOE JTF OBJ SPOD SPOE Concept of Operations Summary (U) 4

  5. Joint Capabilities Document (JCD) Key Points (U) • (U) Captures the results of the FNA and FAA • (U) All critical comments from Services, COCOMs, and FCBs resolved • (U) Organizes the 17 FNA gaps into four functional areas • (U) Operational Speed • (U) Seabasing Persistence • (U) Global Access • (U) Distributed Net Centric / C2 • (U) Recognizes the need for further analytical rigor prior to FSA due to the broad nature of the Seabasing umbrella concept, and the requirement to consolidate multiple efforts into a coherent Joint vision • (U) Recommends JSAW to scope gaps, inform FSAs, and provide a quantitative analytical base that is defendable in acquisition phase • (U) Recommends a Seabasing Integration Team (SIT) overseeing JSAW and FSAs to ensure Joint integration 5

  6. Global Access FSA#4 Seabasing Persistence FSA#3 Operational Speed FSA#2 Joint Sea Base Forcible Entry At Sea Assembly Joint Sea-Based Sustainment Protect Against Conventional Weapons Op Movement and Maneuver Force Health Protection Maritime / Littoral Fires Personnel Recovery Movement & Sustainment JCD-Proposed FSAs and Recommended Sponsors (U) Distributed Net-Centric / C2 FSA#1 Sync/Execution Collaborative Planning Situational Awareness RISK Lev Mission Partners Information Transport JFCOM USN USN Log Information Fusion Enterprise Services SIT monitor ongoing CBAs 6

  7. Joint Seabasing Analysis and Wargaming (JSAW) (U) • (U) JSAW process • (U) Consolidate Seabasing visions • (U) Refine CONOPS • (U) Qualitative wargaming • (U) Quantitative modeling and simulation • (U) Leverage Operational Availability-08 framework and MCO-1 scenario applied to the 2015 to 2025 timeframe • (U) Objectives • (U) Quantify the scope and risk of the 17 capability gaps identified in the FNA • (U) Focus and economize FSA efforts by eliminating redundancies • (U) JSAW results become JCD Appendix K • (U) Quantify risks associated with proceeding or not proceeding with solutions to each gap • (U) Prioritize gaps based on risk assessment 7

  8. Recommendations (U) • (U) JROC approve JCD • (U) JROC direct JSAW • (U) JROC approve FSA sponsors • (U) Operational Speed: JFCOM • (U) Seabasing Persistence: USN • (U) Global Access: USN • (U) J-8 SAGD update JROC regarding proposed JSAW lead and resource strategy 8

  9. Seabasing JCD Summary of Issues (U) • (U) Issues • (U) JSAW funding • (U) Requests for JROC • (U) Approve JCD • (U) Direct JSAW • (U) Approve FSA Sponsors • (U) Operational Speed: USN • (U) Seabasing Persistence: USN • (U) Global Access: USN • (U) J-8 SAGD update JROC regarding proposed JSAW lead and resource strategy 9

  10. JCB Brief 10

  11. Overview (U) • (U) Purpose • (U) Seabasing background and recommended way ahead • (U) Seabasing concept, scope, assumptions, and operational view • (U) Joint Capabilities Document (JCD) key points • (U) Proposed Functional Solutions Analyses (FSAs) and sponsors • (U) Joint Seabasing Analysis and Wargaming (JSAW) • (U) Recommendations 11

  12. Purpose (U) • (U) Gain JROC approval of the Seabasing JCD • (U) Receive JROC direction to proceed with JSAW • (U) Obtain JROC approval of recommended FSA sponsors 12

  13. FSA Phase JROC Approved JROC Approved JROC Decision JROC Approved Nov 06 Staffing Complete Further analysis recommended by JCD Oct 05 Nov 05 JCD Recommendations (U) Initiate a Joint Seabasing Analysis and Wargaming (JSAW) study to inform the FSA process by scoping the 17 capability gaps identified in the FNA (U) Assign sponsors for three of the four FSAs derived from the 17 FNA gaps: - Operational Speed – JFCOM - Seabasing Persistence – USN - Global Access – USN - Net Centric / C2 – Similar FSAs currently being conducted by multiple CBAs Seabasing Background and Recommended Way Ahead (U) JIC FAA FNA JCD JSAW FSA • Recommended Way Ahead • (U) JROC approve the JCD in order to progress to the FSA phase • (U) JROC direct the JSAW in order to analytically inform and refine the FSAs • (U) JROC approve FSA sponsors in order to enhance synchronization between JSAW and FSAs • (U) J-8 SAGD update JROC regarding JSAW lead and resource strategy 13

  14. Seabasing Concept, Scope, and Assumptions (U) • (U) Seabasing is a concept integrating Joint capabilities in order to provide a scalable, national strategic capability to close, assemble, employ, sustain, and reconstitute Joint combat forces from the sea. • (U) 2015-2025 timeframe • (U) Assumptions: • (U) Lack of assured access to land bases • (U) Increased requirement for forward deployed forces • (U) Asymmetric, multi-dimensional force protection challenges • (U) Greater operational flexibility / maneuver space • (U) Analysis based on supporting two brigade-sized combat units 14

  15. Aerial Port of Debarkation Aerial Port of Embarkation Joint Task Force Objective Sea Port of Debarkation Sea Port of Embarkation APOD APOE JTF OBJ SPOD SPOE Seabasing Operational View OV-1 (U) 15

  16. Joint Capabilities Document (JCD) Key Points (U) • (U) Captures the results of the FNA and FAA • (U) All critical comments from Services, COCOMs, and FCBs resolved • (U) Organizes the 17 FNA gaps into four functional areas • (U) Operational Speed • (U) Seabasing Persistence • (U) Global Access • (U) Distributed Net Centric / C2 • (U) Recognizes the need for further analytical rigor prior to FSA due to the broad nature of the Seabasing umbrella concept, and the requirement to consolidate multiple efforts into a coherent Joint vision • (U) Recommends JSAW to scope gaps, inform FSAs, and provide a quantitative analytical base that is defendable in acquisition phase • (U) Recommends a Seabasing Integration Team (SIT) overseeing JSAW and FSAs to ensure Joint integration 16

  17. Global Access FSA#4 Seabasing Persistence FSA#3 Operational Speed FSA#2 Joint Sea Base Forcible Entry At Sea Assembly Joint Sea-Based Sustainment Protect Against Conventional Weapons Op Movement and Maneuver Force Health Protection Maritime / Littoral Fires Personnel Recovery Movement & Sustainment JCD-Proposed FSAs and Recommended Sponsors (U) Distributed Net-Centric / C2 FSA#1 Sync/Execution Collaborative Planning Situational Awareness RISK Lev Mission Partners Information Transport JFCOM USN USN Log Information Fusion Enterprise Services SIT monitor ongoing CBAs 17

  18. JSAW Seabasing Publications FSA Consolidate Visions Service Doctrine Quantitative Qualitative JIC, FAA, FNA, JCD Wargaming FSA Draft Study Plans Modeling and Simulation Refine CONOPS (U) OA-08 MCO-1 Scenario Previous wargames, M&S, experimentation 2025 2015 Joint Seabasing Analysis and Wargaming (JSAW) Process (U) Functional Solutions Analysis • JSAW Objectives (U) • (U) Quantify the scope and risk of the 17 capability gaps identified in the FNA • (U) Focus and economize FSA efforts by eliminating redundancies • (U) JSAW results become JCD Appendix K (quantifies risks associated with proceeding or not proceeding with solutions to each gap, and prioritizes gaps based on risk assessment) 18

  19. Recommendations (U) FSA Phase JROC Approved JROC Approved JROC Approved FNA JCD JSAW FSA JIC FAA Nov 06 Oct 05 Nov 05 1. (U) Approve JCD 2. (U) Direct JSAW 3. (U) Approve FSA sponsors - (U) Operational Speed – JFCOM - (U) Seabasing Persistence – USN - (U) Global Access – USN 19

  20. Backup Slides 20

  21. Capabilities-Based Assessment (CBA) Status (U) • (U) JROC approved Joint Integrating Concept (JIC) Oct 05 • (U) JROC approved Functional Area Analysis (FAA) Nov 05 • (U) Identified and prioritized 15 required capabilities • (U) JROC approved Functional Needs Assessment (FNA) Nov 06 • (U) Developed 17 capability gaps • (U) Joint Capabilities Document (JCD) Complete • (U) Captures the results of the FAA and FNA • (U) Pending JROC approval 21

  22. Joint Seabasing Analysis and Wargaming (JSAW) Process (U) JSAW Seabasing Publications FSA Consolidate Visions Service Doctrine Quantitative Qualitative Functional Solutions Analysis JIC, FAA, FNA, JCD Wargaming FSA Draft Study Plans Modeling and Simulation Refine CONOPS (U) OA-08 MCO-1 Scenario 2015 Previous wargames, M&S, experimentation 2025 (U) Key Questions: (U) What are the components and core capabilities of a sea base? (U) Will a sea base enhance Joint combat effectiveness and/or mitigate risk? Desired capabilities of Sea Base 2025 Capabilities of Sea Base 2015 (existing POR) • JSAW Objectives (U) • (U) Quantify the scope and risk of the 17 capability gaps identified in the FNA • (U) Focus and economize FSA efforts by eliminating redundancies • (U) JSAW results become JCD Appendix K 22

  23. JSAW Strategic Study Questions (U) • (U) What are the components and core capabilities that will constitute a 2015 sea base in the context of a selected major combat operation (MCO) scenario? • (U) Does “Sea Base 2015” enhance Joint combat effectiveness and mitigate risk to the warfighter in the MCO scenario? • (U) What components and core capabilities should constitute a 2025 sea base in the MCO scenario? • (U) Does “Sea Base 2025” enhance Joint combat effectiveness and mitigate risk to the warfighter considering a 2025 projected threat posture applied to the MCO scenario? 23

  24. JSAW Analytic Objectives (U) • (U) Develop a wargaming and modeling and simulation (M&S) plan that: • (U) Informs Joint experimentation and Seabasing CONOPs • (U) Integrates/refines OA-08 Case 2 CONOPs • (U) Validates and scopes FNA capability gaps, and assesses the lines of operation • (U) Identifies new capability gaps • (U) Develops data from JIC, FNA, JCD, and OA-08 Case 2 to support wargaming and M&S • (U) Determines measures of effectiveness (MOEs) and measures of performance (MOPs) addressing gaps using: • (U) JCD identified objective and threshold values • (U) JCD prioritized capabilities, deficiencies, and gaps • (U) Produces sufficiently detailed wargaming results to inform analytic experimental designs • (U) Supports a Joint Requirements Oversight Council (JROC) decision brief illustrating Seabasing’s ability to mitigate risk to the warfighter prior to expending additional resources • (U) Informs subsequent FSA efforts 24

  25. (U) Seabasing Integration Team (SIT) Oversight (U) Seabasing Integration Team (SIT) Oversight 2D Fleet 2D Fleet USAF USAF SOCOM SOCOM JFCOM ARCIC MCCDC ARCIC MCCDC JFCOM TRANSCOM TRANSCOM Current JSAW Options (U) Wargaming and M&S cost: $1.3M Wargaming and M&S cost: TBD (U) Leverage OA-08 data to analyze Joint Seabasing combat effectiveness and risk in MCO-1 through wargaming, and modeling and simulation (M&S) to provide a solid, defendable analytic base for FSAs 25

  26. Major Programs Expected to Contribute to Seabasing (U) • (U) DoN preview • (U) Maritime Prepositioning Force Future • (U) Seabase-to-Shore Connector • (U) High Speed Connectors • (U) Joint High Speed Vessel • (U) Joint High Speed Sealift • (U) V-22 • (U) CH-53K • (U) Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle • (U) Global Fleet Station Concept • (U) USA preview • (U) Afloat Forward Staging Base • (U) High Speed Connectors • (U) Joint Heavy Lift • (U) Joint Logistics Over-The-Shore 26

  27. Major Programs Expected to Contribute to Seabasing (U) JROC Decision Brief JCB Brief 27

  28. JOCs JOCs JOCs JOCs JOCs JOCs JOCs JOCs JOCs JOCs JOCs JOCs JOCs JFCs JICs JCAs Joint Functional Area (U) Capstone Concept for Joint Operations (CCJO) Seabasing enables and supports all joint concepts in an anti-access environment (U) Battlespace Awareness (U) Command and Control (U) Force Application (U) Focused Logistics (U) Force Protection (U) Net Centric Ops (U) Force Management (U) Training (U) Strategic Deterrence (U) Major Combat Operations (U) Stability Operations (U) Homeland Security (U) Irregular Warfare (U) Global Strike (U) Joint Forcible Entry (U) Joint Undersea Superiority (U) Persistent ISR (U) Joint Logistics (Distribution) (U) Seabasing (U) Joint Command & Control (U) Net Centric Operating Env (U) Integrated Air & Missile Def (U) Seabasing Tier I Joint Access & Access Denial Operations Tier II (U) Freedom of Nav (U) LOC Protection (U) Contingency Basing (U) Seabasing (U) Forcible Entry (U) Blockade 28

  29. Gap 1: Joint Sea Base (U) (U) Seabasing (Tier 2) (U) Gap #1: Joint Sea Base – The joint sea base has limited capability to serve as a base for joint forces at sea a. (U) Collective COCOM/FCB prioritized capabilities: (U) 6 – Provide on-scene C2 and ISR systems that are interoperable with joint and select multi-national systems, scalable to mission requirements, and rapidly deployable (U) 9 – Provide the joint force a base at sea and a complement to existing global basing strategy (U) 11 – Ability for joint forces to rapidly move to/from a sea base b. (U) Gap Characterization: Legacy sea base platforms and joint forces equipment are not designed to be sufficiently interoperable to support independent sea base operations for extended periods (30+ days) without in-theater ISBs or land based support. Legacy platforms are not optimally designed to support the hosting (habitability, work spaces, compatibility and interoperability) and scalable capability (120–500 personnel) required for a JTF core component and early entry tactical HQ command element capable of continuous operations. c. (U) Applicable FAA Tasks (UJTLs): (U) OP 1.2.4–Conduct operations in depth (U) OP 1.2.5–Conduct offensive operations in the JOA (U) OP 5.5–Establish, organize, and operate a joint force headquarters (U) OP 4.4–Coordinate support for forces in the JOA (U) OP 4.5.1–Provide for movement of services in the JOA 29

  30. FNA Prioritized Seabasing Capabilities (U) 30 (U) COCOM and FCB survey produced capability prioritization

  31. Capability Gaps (U) (U) 17 Capability Gaps FNA Analysis of 15 Required Capabilities (U) FNA analysis produced 17 capability gaps aligned under 8 Tier 1 and 16 Tier 2 JCAs 31

More Related