1 / 34

The Durban deal: views from inside the negotiations.

The Durban deal: views from inside the negotiations. . Adrian Macey, VUW, February 2012. Durban resources. http://unfccc.int/2860.php - Durban texts http://www.iisd.ca/climate/cop17 - ENB report. Durban political core. Kyoto. Linked issues. $. 2020. Durban real core.

silas
Download Presentation

The Durban deal: views from inside the negotiations.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Durban deal: views from inside the negotiations. Adrian Macey, VUW, February 2012

  2. Durban resources • http://unfccc.int/2860.php - Durban texts • http://www.iisd.ca/climate/cop17 - ENB report

  3. Durban political core Kyoto Linked issues $ 2020

  4. Durban real core Accounting rules Linked issues Mitigation by all major emitters Global regime

  5. Kyoto Protocol • Second commitment period secured • Most rules decided • Market mechanisms preserved from attacks • Gives some certainty for 2013-2020 • To be decided in 2012: • Commitment period 5 or 8 years • Qelros – pledges into carbon budgets • Carry-over (“hot air”) • Ambition in abeyance

  6. LCA (Convention track) • Mitigation to 2020 confirmed • Elements of post-2020 architecture advanced • Ambition and global goals given political recognition • Review in 2013-15

  7. New negotiating mandate • “Bali Rev 1” to reflect Copenhagen, Cancún + Durban gains • Form is new: protocol, legal instrument or “agreed outcome with legal force” (cf Bali’s “agreed outcome”) • Equal legal treatment is new • Content is not: mitigation, adaptation, finance, technology, capacity building, transparency • Strong acknowledgement of ambition gap – linked to 2013-15 review • Will build on LCA (Convention negotiating track) work

  8. Why did Durban exceed expectations? • “Without doubt, the Durban Climate Change Conference was the most encompassing and furthest reaching conference in the history of the climate change negotiations” • Political ‘must haves’ recognised early • Expectations on ambition were realistic- and low • Key players stuck to message • BASIC without a common agenda • The “African COP” • South African presidency style • UNFCCC leadership style

  9. NZ’s Durban deeds • Brokering of core mitigation outcomes on Convention track • Kyoto Protocol chair • Ideas influential • template for commitments and actions • markets • Agriculture work programme agreed • Awarded record number of ‘fossils’

  10. New Zealand issues • What’s our number? • Kyoto – do we stay or do we go? • What to put in the agriculture work programme? • Methane • Markets • Contribution to finance • Australia • ETS • Post-2020 regime preferences

  11. New Zealand post 2012 target • New Zealand is prepared to take on a responsibility target for greenhouse gas emissions reductions of between 10 per cent and 20 per cent below 1990 levels by 2020, if there is a comprehensive global agreement. This means:• the global agreement sets the world on a pathway to limit temperature rise to not more than 2° C;• developed countries make comparable efforts to those of New Zealand;• advanced and major emitting developing countries take action fully commensurate with their respective capabilities;• there is an effective set of rules for land use, land-use change and forestry (LULUCF); and• there is full recourse to a broad and efficient international carbon market.

  12. New Zealand post 2012 commitment • l New Zealand is prepared to consider submitting information on its QELRO, pursuant to decision 1/CMP.7, paragraph 5, following the necessary domestic processes and taking into account decision 1/CP.17, decisions on mitigation (-/CP.17) and the .indaba./mandate outcome decision (-/CP.17) and decisions -/CMP.7 (Land use, land-use change and forestry), -/CMP.7 (Emissions trading and the project-based mechanisms, -/CMP.7 (Greenhouse gases, sectors and source categories, common metrics to calculate the carbon dioxide equivalence of anthropogenic emissions by sources and removals by sinks, and other methodological issues and -/CMP.7 (Consideration of information on potential environmental, economic and social consequences, including spillover effects, of tools, policies, measures and methodologies available to Annex I Parties) .

  13. Process-heavy in 2012... • AWGKP – finishing off • AWGLCA – finishing off • “AWGDPEA”(?) – the new negotiation • Finance Standing Committee • Green Climate Fund • Technology Executive Committee • Adaptation committee • Forum on response measures • As well as existing bodies: SBSTA,SBI,COP,CMP • etc......

  14. Issues for the world • Momentum 2013-2020 • negotiations • transformation to low carbon economic growth • 2013-15 review • Shape of 2020 agreement

  15. Opening ceremony

  16. Handover to South African presidency

  17. President Zuma

  18. UN Secretary General

  19. NZ delegation leaders (day one)

  20. Meeting rooms...

  21. COP 17 Climate trade fair

  22. Side events...

  23. Wall of shame

  24. Locked out

  25. Kyoto Protocol team

  26. Kyoto Protocol options

  27. Indaba

  28. Final hours

  29. Final hours

  30. The final “huddle”

More Related