1 / 5

Institutional actors: planning to improve organisational learning

Institutional actors: planning to improve organisational learning. for projects towards intercultural dialogue Alexadria, July 2008. By Neus Lorenzo <nlorenzo@xtec.cat>. Content. The role of institutional actors ( Who’s who?) -Identifying agents and responsibilities for changing concepts

simeon
Download Presentation

Institutional actors: planning to improve organisational learning

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Institutional actors:planning to improve organisational learning for projects towards intercultural dialogue Alexadria, July 2008 By Neus Lorenzo <nlorenzo@xtec.cat>

  2. Content • The role of institutional actors ( Who’s who?) -Identifying agents and responsibilities for changing concepts • More involvement needed (Why do it?) -Values and Beliefs • More coherency needed (Who are we?) -Identity and Mission • Better definition and orientation (Where to?) -Vision and innovation • Better adaptation to context (What for?) -Aims and Goals • Too much territory & dispersion (How to manage?) -Strategic Plan, SWOT, Management Design • Resources (tools or strategies?) -Training, Leadership, Participation, Assessment… … … ...

  3. Who’s who? Agents To improve co-operation and teamworkwithin schools and between schools To promote intercultural dialogue and interchange between cultures The role of institutional actors • Institutional agents • Legislators • Media • Authorities • Advisers • Religious Institutions • Associations • Foundations • Enterprises • Social Educators • Teachers • Parents • … … ... • Surfing for adventure in visible projects? • Coaching initiatives and giving support for in-depth improvement?

  4. Who’s who? Responsabilities Tension: A single person project Bad timing: teams work out of sync Sudden problems: Lack of accuracy Unsetle: Badly planned Bad project design: Mismatching expectations Identifying problems and proposing solutions • Some questions about 2007-08: • What’s the difference between a poor and incomplete project and a successful one? • When did a project work the best? • What resources were the most useful? • What are best practices for networks? • Let’s reflect on your answers… • Do they allow to identify problems and suggest solutions? • How do we define good descriptors and indicators? • - to know tendencies • - to assess progress • - to analyse results

  5. Who’s who? Changing concepts Shared values Participation Dialogue and commitment Register of agreements Planning Institutional Projects • Form a group of three people, a let’s give marks to your answers (points per person)... • 1- A document, a text, an application… • 2- A group of actors, involving schools and teachers... • 3- A process, a development, a trip, a discovery... • 4- A path to the future, a vision for shared values... • Changing concepts: • What is an institutional Project… ? • (Are they really needed? Why?) 5 minutes

More Related