360 likes | 430 Views
Liaison Council Update. December 14, 2005. Key points about EEP. Designed to provide: watershed approach to mitigation efficient use of resources facilitation of responsible development. Key points about EEP. Major administrative duties: manage funds strategic planning programming work
E N D
Liaison Council Update December 14, 2005
Key points about EEP • Designed to provide: • watershed approach to mitigation • efficient use of resources • facilitation of responsible development
Key points about EEP Major administrative duties: • manage funds • strategic planning • programming work • leverage resources • contract administration (Q/A) • reporting • addressing compliance/new rules and regulations • proposing strategies based on new science emerging technology
Key points about EEP • Outsource majority of work, rely heavily on the private sector for production • Design, Bid, Build • Full Delivery • Land Owner Contacts • Watershed planning • Monitoring • Coordination and Guidance • Program Assessment and Consistency Group • Partnerships
Business Model Assemble requests for mitigation Course corrections if required Evaluate existing assets Evaluate progress/ quality Calculate the net remaining need Design strategies to satisfy need Contract work
EEP Business Model Accounting • MOA in-lieu (tri party agreement) • MOU in-lieu • Buffer program • Nutrient Offset program
EEP Requirements/Oversight Regulatory • USACE • NCDWQ • NCDCM • FHWA • NCWRC • USFWS • NOAA Legislative/Gov. • ERC • EMC Partnering • NCDOT • USACE • FHWA
Leveraging • Begin with watershed assessment of needs • Assign contracts within watersheds to: • reduce redundancy • reduce number of contracts • provide economies of scale (larger more effective projects) • efficient and effective use of resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Biennial Budget FY 2005/06 and 2006-07 Cost by Category: Total $175,077,880 Summary Administration $ 9,477,939 Restoration* $ 102,910,770 HQ Preservation $ 57,984,804 Project Development $ 4,704,366 Biennial Total $175, 077,880 *Includes Implementation and Future Mitigation Projects
Program Progress Report Suzanne Klimek Director of Operations
Progress Report • End of Transition Compliance • Other ILF programs • Buffer • Nutrient offset • Fund Reports
Data Sources • End of Transition Report • Annual Report for FY 2004-2005 www.nceep.net – follow links to Publications page
End of Transition Compliance - Overall • Streams = 98.70% • Wetlands = 95.04% • Highest level of compliance ever for NC’s ILF Programs • Includes 5:1 return of HQ Preservation • Permits for which 1:1 restoration has not been provided remain covered by 10:1 preservation
Where is the non-compliance? • Non-compliance has decreased since report date • CAT 03 most difficult area • Actively working to address outstanding needs
Status of Nutrient Offset Program • Specific to Neuse River Basin • Pounds per acre per year
Projects in Monitoring • 24 stream projects -- 93,978 lf • 25 wetland projects – 5,464 acres • Vegetation – stream and wetland • 64% • Efforts underway to increase veg success • Stream success – overall • 80% morphology • 6 projects structural maintenanceWetland success – overall • 92% hydrology
Status of Funds • MOA and MOU funds managed separately • MOA budget based on cash flow • MOU budget based on encumbrance
Status of Funds - MOU Program Graph 4
Project Delivery Mechanisms – current contracts • Full Delivery • Contract value = $87,082,559 • Design-Bid-Build • Contract value = $39,612,933
General Activities • National Wetland Newsletter Sept. 05 • ECOS Spring 05 • National Mitigation Banking Conference • Professional Engineers of North Carolina • Caanan Valley Institute • EPA Region III/FHWA Streamlining
Mutual Accomplishments • Top 50 award for government innovation (Harvard University School of Government- 2005) • Environmental Excellence Award (National Association of Environmental Professionals- 2005) • Innovation (National Association of Development Organizations- 2003)
Mutual Accomplishments • Exemplary Ecosystem Initiative (Federal Highway Administration- 2004) • Environmental Excellence Award (Federal Highway Administration- 2003) • Transportation Research Board (National Publication- 2005) • 2005 Council of State Finalist - Innovation
Project Delays In the past 30 months of existence there have been no project delays resulting from mitigation
On the horizon: • MOA adjustments • Expansion of nutrient offset • Cost study – possible fee revisions • GARVEE bonds • Building Information Management System • More training of construction contractors
Reports • Quarterly Reports • Annual Report • End of Transition Report www.nceep.net
Business Model Assemble requests for mitigation Course corrections if required Evaluate existing assets Evaluate progress/ quality Calculate the net remaining need Design strategies to satisfy need Contract work
Planned near term activities Dec 05/Jan06 Coastal RFPs Feb-Mar 06 Operational Strategic Plan Mar 06 Second wave FDP RFPs Apr 06 -Jun 06 Award of Oct 05 RFPs Mar-Apr 06 Biennial Budget Jul 06- Aug 06 First wave SFY 07 RFPs Aug-Sep 06 Annual Report
Liaison Council Update December 14, 2005