150 likes | 313 Views
Kim Nixon, NSW Community Services Kim.Nixon@community.nsw.gov.au. Responding to vulnerable families in child welfare systems, through the effective use of case reviews. Metro West Practice Standards Unit. Established in December 2007 Director, Practice Standards (DPS)
E N D
Kim Nixon, NSW Community ServicesKim.Nixon@community.nsw.gov.au Responding to vulnerable families in child welfare systems, through the effective use of case reviews
Metro West Practice Standards Unit • Established in December 2007 • Director, Practice Standards (DPS) • Up to 11 Casework Specialists (CWS) • Region Wide Team • Covers eight Community Service Centres (CSC’s) from Katoomba to Auburn
Case reviews are used nationally and internationally • Day to day management of child protection matters; • Management of children and young people in OOHC systems; • Learning from child deaths or cases of significant harm; • For the specific purpose of continuous quality improvement.
Sample of Case Review Referrals • Team up in pairs or threes • Read the case scenario for the Henry* Family and briefly consider: • What action might need to be taken to conduct a comprehensive review of this case? * A compilation of several case reviews, using a pseudonym
KOLB’S REFLECTIVE LEARNING CYCLE (1988)Adapted for use by Dr Judith Gibbs and CS PDQA Unit Experience Plan and Act Reflect Analyse
1. The Referral • The referral form collects basic information such as family composition and ages, reason for the referral, number of case files. • All paper and computerised files are reviewed prior to discussions with caseworkers or managers. • Additional files such as parent’s files or foster care files may be sought.
2. Review of case files and computerised information • A chronology is compiled, identifying gaps or patterns in the facts or evidence; highlighting any unsupported statements about a child, their family and their history. • Concurrently reviews relevant research literature, as well as policies, procedures, guidelines and legislation that might inform the review.
Bias and Errors in Reasoning • failure to consider new information • resistance to new information • inability of the worker to change their mind May be evident in case documentation
3. CWS and DPS meet • Kolb’s RLC used to assist the CWS to: • “interrogate” available information; • unpack current understanding of the case; • make explicit assumptions or beliefs; • draw on knowledge of theory and practice experiences; • and consider new possibilities.
4. Meeting between the CWS and the CSC staff • Provides an opportunity for staff to unpack their own experiences; and to reflect on the case, their practice and on any new case and research evidence and considerations, provided by the CWS. • Ensure discussion around case history and future case considerations remains grounded in the evidence.
5. Preparation of the Case Review Report • Reports are prepared using a standardised template and style format • Case and research evidence is fully referenced • Assumptions, existing beliefs, and decision making not supported by the evidence, are actively challenged in a diplomatic and non blaming manner • Case considerations are provided, with no surprises for the CSC Staff
Important steps in Case Reviews • gathering relevant evidence from all possible sources; checking the accuracy of all case evidence • analysing and critically reflecting on all available case and research evidence • interviewing the children wherever possible • obtaining a good knowledge of the case history
Impact of the Case Reviews • Evidence is provided for future casework and case planning • Case practice is strengthened • Capacity for quality practice is developed • Better outcomes are achieved for children in the child welfare system
Kim Nixon, NSW Community ServicesKim.Nixon@community.nsw.gov.au Responding to vulnerable families in child welfare systems, through the effective use of case reviews