470 likes | 776 Views
Pre-flash Crude Fractionation. Jonathan Peters Miguel Bagajewicz. Outline. Conventional Distillation Pre-flash Fractionation Previous Work Mission Statement Optimization Results: Light Crude Results: Heavy Crude. Conventional Distillation. Inject steam in the bottom
E N D
Pre-flash Crude Fractionation Jonathan Peters Miguel Bagajewicz
Outline • Conventional Distillation • Pre-flash Fractionation • Previous Work • Mission Statement • Optimization • Results: Light Crude • Results: Heavy Crude
Conventional Distillation • Inject steam in the bottom • Feed is desalted and heated • 5 products
D86 Points • ASTM standard - specifies product purity • Defined as a percentage of the product that boils at a specific temperature • Naphtha – 95% D86 182oC
Gaps Minimum gap refers to the lowest temperature difference required to obtain the desired separation Gaps greater than the minimum are acceptable Boiling Point Temp.
Side Column • 4 trays • No reboiler or condenser • Inject steam to control separation • Draw from column • Return to tray above draw return draw steam product
Conventional Distillation Add side columns
Conventional Distillation Add pumparounds to reduce heat utility
Conventional Optimization Simulation PFD for conv. optimization
Conventional Optimization Heat Demand-Supply Diagram Heat supply and demand are represented by areas. Supply can only cover demand on the left. Uncovered demand is satisfied by utilities (red area). Shift heat from condenser to PA1 to reduce Utility
Conventional Optimization Heat Demand-Supply Diagram Shift heat from PA1 to PA2
Conventional Optimization Heat Demand-Supply Diagram Shift heat from PA2 to PA3
Conventional Optimization Heat Demand-Supply Diagram Some heat demand still remains
Crude Unit Flow Diagram Heat Exchanger Network Crude Unit PFD with HEN
Conventional Distillation Pinch Calculator Replace HEN with a “black box”
Pre-flash Fractionation Pinch Calculator Add a preflash drum
Previous Work Tray 1 Tray 15 34 Trays Total Heated to 163oC Send vapor to Tray 15
Previous Work Pre-flash reduces vapor-liquid holdup
Previous Work Residue/feed ratio decreases with an increasing K value
Previous Work • Concluded that pre-flash was only more energy efficient if gas oil yield was reduced • Steam cannot replace all carrier effect of light components
Mission Statement • Previous work studied pre-flash fractionation with the addition of one flash drum • This work studies the effect of pre-flash fractionation with the addition of multiple flash drums in both light and heavy crude systems • Systematic optimization of pre-flash fractionation
Pre-flash Optimization Set pre-flash temperature
Pre-flash Optimization Vapors are sent to column
Pre-flash Optimization Set pumparound duty
Pre-flash Optimization Red - simulation did not converge, readjust
Pre-flash Optimization Blue – simulation converged
Results • Light Crude • Heavy Crude
New Design • In the process of investigating this, a new design was proposed • Technical details of this new design cannot be made public at this time • We will only disclose the impact of the new design in terms of new flow rates of products and the economics
Light Crude - Flow Rates For the light crude, the new design increases gas oil yield from pre-flash design, but not from conventional
Light Crude – Min. Heat Utility New design reduces min. heat utility
Light Crude – Steam Usage New design steam usage is about the same as conv.
Heavy Crude – Flow Rates New design increases gas oil yield over the conventional case
Heavy Crude – Min. Heat Utility New design reduces min. heat utility
Heavy Crude – Steam Usage New design steam usage is about the same as conv.
Economics Light Crude Heavy Crude New design increases profit from conv. for heavy crude
Conclusion • Multiple pre-flashing does not reduce the minimum heat utility • Gas Oil flow rate is reduced and Residue is increased • The new design shows noticeable energy improvement and gas oil recovery from conventional distillation for heavy crudes • Further studies are warranted
References 1. Bagajewicz M. and S. Ji. Rigorous Targeting Procedure for the Design of Crude Fractionation Units with Pre-Flashing or Pre-Fractionation. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 41, 12, pp. 3003-3011 (2002). 2. Bagajewicz M. and S. Ji. Rigorous Procedure for the Design of Conventional Atmospheric Crude Fractionation Units Part I: Targeting. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research. Vol. 40, No 2, pp. 617-626 (2001).
Acknowledgements Stephanie English Jesse Sandlin Ernest West Chris Wilson Su Zhu Dan Dobesh