190 likes | 199 Views
This presentation discusses the economic arguments for reforms in the public sector, key management reforms, and the costs of managing the public fleet. It also proposes a vehicle ownership scheme as a reform to optimize fleet utilization and reduce government burden.
E N D
ECONOMIC COSTS OF NOT REFORMING THE PUBLIC SECTOR: THE CASE OF PUBLIC FLEET MANAGEMENT 2013 ECAMA ANNUAL CONFERENCE PETER NGOMA, Ph.D MALAWI INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT VICE PRESIDENT, ECAMA
PRESENTATION OUTLINE • ECONOMIC ARGUMENTS FOR REFORMS • KEY ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT REFORMS • PUBLIC FLEET MANAGEMENT • COSTS OF MANAGING THE PUBLIC FLEET • VEHICLE OWNERSHIP SCHEME AS A REFORM • CONCLUSIONS
KEY ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT REFORMS • Parastatal policy and legal framework • Asset management system in public service • Stores and supplies management • Public service pension scheme • Consolidation of IFMIS • Local development management • Budget management • Auditing system
PUBLIC FLEET MANAGEMENT • Excludes parastatals, MDF, police - mainly central government MDAs • Station wagons – Include Land Cruisers, Prados, Pajeros, etc • Saloon – Include Mercedes Benz, Camry, etc • All types – Include Ambulances, Tractors. Motorcycles, Graders, Lorries, Buses, Minibuses, etc
COSTS OF MANAGING THE PUBLIC FLEET • Recurrent budget only – excludes development budget • Motor vehicle running expenses budget line only – excludes new purchases • Includes fuel and lubricants (71%); maintenance (23%); insurance (6%) • Excludes parastatal organisations
STAFF COMPLIMENT IN MDAs • Officers entitled to vehicles (station wagon/saloon) – about 706 • Officers entitled to 500 liters of fuel per month for local running – about 94 • Officer entitled to 250 liters per month for local running – about 612 • Entitled to fuel for performing duties outside office. • Vehicle maintenance paid for by line MDA
AVOIDABLE COSTS ON FLEET MANAGEMENT • VEHICLE MISUSE – MAINTENANCE COSTS • FUEL MISUSE • THEFT OF SPARE PARTS; • DRIVERS’ COSTS;
VEHICLE OWNERSHIP SCHEME AS A REFORM • Curtails growing size of public fleet; • Optimizes utilization of public fleet; • Reduces government burden of fleet management; • Eases transportation problem of public servants (P5 and below); • Source of motivation to public servants; • Increases efficiency of public servants; • Introduces equity and transparency in allocation of public resources.
THE CASE OF RWANDA • Targeted all public officers • Vehicles bought through loans granted by commercial banks • Loan servicing up to a third of one’s salary • Employees eligible to maximum loan: • 3000 – 5000 cc for high ranking officials • 2500 – 3000 cc for ministers and equivalent • 1500 – 2500 cc for other officials • Vehicles exempted of import taxes and duties • Comprehensive insurance throughout loan period • Government contributes to operating costs for official purposes • Field travel (outside 30 km from office) either through hire or public transport – specified number of days per month • Government only kept vehicles for: • Political officials, commanders, generals • Mayors • Ambassadors • State protocol • Military, police and prisons operations • Ambulances • Salary reforms!!! • Estimated average saving of about 35%
IN MALAWI … THE CASE OF PRIVATE SECTOR • Employer guaranteed vehicle loan (private property – ensuring prudent management) • Running expenses covered – fuel, maintenance, etc • Insurance coverage • Use for both official and private business • Driver by choice (costs reduced) • High efficiency • High productivity
WHAT MUST BE RESOLVED TO IMPLEMENT VEHICLE OWNERSHIP SCHEME • Lack of incentive to vehicle ownership scheme: • Age of senior officers • Already privileged and subsidized • Vehicle type • Age of vehicle • High initial cost to procure new vehicles: • Phased by year • Phased by grades • Board off • Revive PVHO • Loan default • Job mobility • National ID • Low salaries • Salary reforms • Pension reforms
CONCLUSIONS • Economic arguments for public sector reform rhetoric are a global phenomenon (Pollitt et al. 2004; Smullen 2010; Van Thiel 2004). • To get a clear idea of the implications of reforms, there is a need for detailed ECONOMIC ANALYSIS between the nature of reforms and the effects.
REFLECTION ‘There is an ocean of studies of the application of New Public Management ideas but only a modest sea of works that offer direct empirical economic analysis and no more than a small pond that convincingly connect specific reforms to particular economic outcomes’