310 likes | 433 Views
Module 8 – Abnormal Enterprise Income Growth Junichi Hara. Where we are…. Learned three models: Free cash flow (FCF) method Residual income (RI) method Abnormal ent erprise income growth (AEIG) method. Conclusion. Value created when actual returns exceeds expected return
E N D
Where we are… • Learned three models: • Free cash flow (FCF) method • Residual income (RI) method • Abnormal enterprise income growth (AEIG) method
Conclusion • Value created when actual returns exceeds expected return • AEIG method least reliant on continuing value
Agenda • Walkthrough • Comparison
Part 1: Next Year’s EPAT AnchorAssumes firm earns same EPAT forever
Part 2: agr Within Horizon agr = abnormal enterprise income growth Source of additional value Portion of future earnings exceeding expected return
Part 2: agr Within Horizon Cum-FCF Income Normal Income
Part 2: agr Within Horizon ForecastedIncome Expected Income
Part 2: agr Within Horizon FCF earns expected rate of return Doesn’t provide additional value
Part 2: agr Within Horizon Value created when firm earnsreturn higher than rEnt
Parallel to Residual Income Value created when firm earnsreturn higher than rEnt
Part 3: agrBeyond Horizon Continuing Value Is it realistic to assume perpetual agr > 0?
Equal results • Three methods learned: • Free cash flow (FCF) method • Residual income (RI) method • Abnormal ent. inc. growth (AEIG) method • All three models get the same results
Assumptions • Sales g%: 2.34% • EPM: 4.05% • EATO: 3.45 • WACC 7.34%
Result • Price as of March 14: $74.28 • Need to adjust forecasts
So what’s the difference? • Source of value
Breakdown of Value Estimate Abnormal Enterprise Income Growth Model least reliant on continuing value
Conclusion • Value created when actual returns exceeds expected return • AEIG method least reliant on continuing value