1 / 53

Building a CTRC Consortium Platform: Informatics, Data Sharing and Management of Clinical Trials in Specific Disease Ar

Building a CTRC Consortium Platform: Informatics, Data Sharing and Management of Clinical Trials in Specific Disease Areas . Mike Conlon, University of Florida Paul Harris, Vanderbilt University. The Challenge.

slade
Download Presentation

Building a CTRC Consortium Platform: Informatics, Data Sharing and Management of Clinical Trials in Specific Disease Ar

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Building a CTRC Consortium Platform: Informatics, Data Sharing and Management of Clinical Trials in Specific Disease Areas Mike Conlon, University of Florida Paul Harris, Vanderbilt University

  2. The Challenge • Clinical and Translational Research involves informatics beyond the needs of clinical care • Molecular Level information • Electronic Data Capture • Clinical Trials • Data warehousing • Data sharing • Information Discovery and Dissemination • Scientific Portfolio Management

  3. Emerging Molecular Informatics • Genetics • Personalized medicine – pharmacogenomics, disease risk • Proteomics • Metabolomics • Global and targeted • Mass Spectroscopy and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging

  4. Molecular Informatics at Vanderbilt

  5. PREDICT: PharmacogenomicResource for Enhanced Decisions In Care and Treatment

  6. Denny JC et al. PheWAS: demonstrating the feasibility of a phenome-wide scan to discover gene-disease associations. -- Bioinformatics 2010 May 1;26(9):1205-10. Ritchie MD et al. Robust replication of genotype-phenotype associations across multiple diseases in an electronic medical record. -- Am J Hum Genet 2010 Apr 9;86(4):560-72. Pulley J et al. Principles of human subjects protections applied in an opt-out, de-identified biobank. -- ClinTranslSci 2010 Feb;3(1):42-8. Smith JP et al. PGE2 decreases reactivity of human platelets by activating EP2 and EP4. -- Thromb Res 2010 Jul;126(1):e23-9. Pulley J et al. Identifying unpredicted drug benefit through query of patient experiential knowledge: a proof of concept web-based system. -- ClinTranslSci 2010 Jun;3(3):98-103. Schildcrout JS et al. An analytical approach to characterize morbidity profile dissimilarity between distinct cohorts using electronic medical records. -- J Biomed Inform 2010 Dec;43(6):914-23.

  7. DumitrescuL et al. Assessing the accuracy of observer-reported ancestry in a biorepository linked to electronic medical records. -- Genet Med 2010 Oct;12(10):648-50. Baye TM et al. Mapping genes that predict treatment outcome in admixed populations. -- Pharmacogenomics J 2010 Dec;10(6):465-77. Denny JC et al. Identification of genomic predictors of atrioventricular conduction: using electronic medical records as a tool for genome science. -- Circulation 2010 Nov 16;122(20):2016-21. Ramirez AH et al. Modulators of normal electrocardiographic intervals identified in a large electronic medical record. -- Heart Rhythm 2011 Feb;8(2):271-7. Wilke RA. High-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol: leveraging practice-based biobank cohorts to characterize clinical and genetic predictors of treatment outcome. -- Pharmacogenomics J 2011 Jun;11(3):162-73. Malin B et al. Never too old for anonymity: a statistical standard for demographic data sharing via the HIPAA Privacy Rule. -- J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011 Jan 1;18(1):3-10.

  8. FengQ et al. A common CNR1 (cannabinoid receptor 1) haplotype attenuates the decrease in HDL cholesterol that typically accompanies weight gain. -- PLoS One 2010 Dec 31;5(12):e15779. Wilke RA et al. The emerging role of electronic medical records in pharmacogenomics. -- ClinPharmacolTher 2011 Mar;89(3):379-86. Turner SD et al. Knowledge-driven multi-locus analysis reveals gene-gene interactions influencing HDL cholesterol level in two independent EMR-linked biobanks. -- PLoS One 2011 May 11;6(5):e19586. Higginbotham KS et al. A multistage association study identifies a breast cancer genetic locus at NCOA7. -- Cancer Res 2011 Jun 1;71(11):3881-8. Xu H et al. Facilitating pharmacogenetic studies using electronic health records and natural-language processing: a case study of warfarin. -- J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011 Jul-Aug;18(4):387-91. Wilke RA et al. Genetics and variable drug response. -- JAMA 2011 Jul 20;306(3):306-7. Delaney JT et al. Predicting clopidogrel response using DNA samples linked to an electronic health record. -- ClinPharmacolTher 2012 Feb;91(2):257-63.

  9. Personalized Medicine at Florida

  10. Electronic Data Capture • Strong need for simple methods for collecting data into electronic forms for support of clinical research • Popular software is REDCap – used by a majority of CTSAs and many other institutions

  11. REDCap Project History • 2004 Needs Assessment • Researchers needed help managing data for small/medium sized non-trial research • projects (pilot, R01, PPG) • Hypothesis • Researchers will do the right thing (secure, audit trails, etc) if provided an easy way to get needed tools • Problem • Many projects, few resources

  12. REDCap Project History • Solution: • Metadata-driven application (no per-project programming) • 2004 - First REDCap project operational at Vanderbilt • 2006 - REDCap Consortium • Launched REDCap Consortium to share with other universities and foster collaboration for future development

  13. Case Report Forms PDFs Visual Status Data Validation NumerousField Types + Text (Free) (Number) (Phone) (Zip) (Date) +TextArea +Select +Radio +File HumanReadableLabels BranchingLogic Auto-Variable Coding

  14. Data Export + De-ID Tools EmbeddedDe-IdentificationTools Exports RawData + Stats Script Files (Labels, Coding

  15. Clinical Trial Management Systems Functionality Items to consider Hundreds of systems replaced with one Hundreds of processes replaced with dozens Required flexibility for innovation Required agility for innovation • All aspects of trial management • Time and event management • Electronic data capture • Recruitment support • Interface to clinical systems, laboratory, imaging, prescribing, warehouse • Financial management • Regulatory support • Interfaces to analytic software

  16. Approach to CTMS • Vanderbilt • No Single CTMS supporting research enterprise • StarBRITE for Recruitment, Regulatory, Financial and other CTMS components. Heavy use of REDCap for electronic data capture. • Florida • 1,000 new clinical studies per year • No CTMS, heavy use of REDCap, 100+ local systems in use for trials • Others • Velos • Oncore (especially in Cancer Domain)

  17. Data Warehousing • Data archive for cohort identification, trial planning, recruitment, registries • Create data flows from clinical, laboratory, tissue bank and prescribing systems • Create data flows from consent, trial, and molecular systems • Researchers mine data for planning and results • Care managers mine data for planning and quality improvement

  18. Vanderbilt Data Warehousing

  19. Vanderbilt Data Warehousing Participant Recruitment Example

  20. Study Work Queue (Daily Review) Clinics of Interest ReviewList Starting Here  Filtering Criteria … • Snapshot – Pilot Studies • Nephrology • Examined:   2598 • Candidates:   96 • (reduction - 96%) • Cleft Palate • Examined:   2490 • Candidates:   27 • (reduction - 99%) • Cardiology (2 studies) • (reduction - 95%)

  21. Florida Data Warehousing • Integrated Data Repository with joint governance by research and care • Work began in 2011 • Based on i2b2 software, with common data model across studies, hospital and outpatient • All hospital data for 10 years, personalized medicine

  22. Integrated Data Repository

  23. Data Sharing -- Layered • Share data across institutions at various levels of aggregation – simple counts of procedures and diseases to full personal health records • Technical considerations – definitions, data representation • Policy considerations – risk management, privacy, competitive considerations

  24. Layered Sharing • Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research • Vanderbilt Medical Center • Meharry Medical Center • Florida • Hospital on Jacksonville, 114 km. Epic software • Hospital in Orlando, 182 km. Crimson software • Hospital in Tampa, 209 km. Proposed SHRINE software

  25. Data Sharing -- Study • National Health and Nutrition Survey (NHANES) • Federal Effort • Longitidanal • Common data elements • Available for data mining • Study Level • Data Use Agreements • Standardized definitions for measurement • De-identification

  26. Information Discovery and Dissemination • Need to know what is happening in science – papers, presentations, grants, datasets, funding, proposals, events • Internet – portals, email, Facebook, Twitter • Local CTSA Example: Vanderbilt StarBRITE • VIVO – open software for research discovery

  27. VIVO in China: http://health.las.ac.cn/

  28. Scientific Portfolio Management • Diversity, proportionality across the four translations • Alignment with national, institutional and research strategic planning, goals and objectives • Return on investment

More Related