1 / 43

Risultati recenti di BaBar

a. g. b. Risultati recenti di BaBar. [Una selezione dalle conferenze estive]. CSN1 Napoli 19/09/2005 Giuseppe Finocchiaro Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati. Run5. Run4. Run2. Run3. Run1. The gold rush. (Where `gold’ is no longer J/ y K s )

slundgren
Download Presentation

Risultati recenti di BaBar

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. a g b Risultati recenti di BaBar [Una selezione dalle conferenze estive] CSN1 Napoli 19/09/2005 Giuseppe Finocchiaro Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati

  2. Run5 Run4 Run2 Run3 Run1 The gold rush • (Where `gold’ is no longer J/yKs) • Most analyses in this talk used the Run1-4 dataset (~240fb-1) • KEKB delivered ~470fb-1 so far G. Finocchiaro @ CSN1 Napoli 2005

  3. (The usual) disclaimer • Hard selection required in this talk (75 BABAR abstracts @LP05, 57 @EPS05) • In spite of ‘sub-optimal’ PEP-II performance this year so far, still competitive wrt Belle • “Di necessità virtù”: BABAR‘s analysis power generally (still) compensates for smaller integrated statistics • More physics channels • Better detector (PID, vtx) • More efficient analyses G. Finocchiaro @ CSN1 Napoli 2005

  4. Indice • Angoli (I): g, a • Lati (I): |Vub| da b→uℓn • sin2b: (persistenti) indizi di NP • Lati (II): |Vtd/Vts| da b→d/s g • Ancora nuovi stati: la Y(4260) • Non parlerò di: • (SM:10-40) • B→tn [<2.610-4@90%CL] (SM:8.1±2.510-5) • B→Ksp0g [hep-ex/0507038] (SM:L.H. g sin2b~0.04) • Conclusioni, prospettive G. Finocchiaro @ CSN1 Napoli 2005

  5. b→ucs b→cus UT angles: g • From direct CPV in the decay of charged B’s • Interfering tree amplitudes w/ CP-violating relative weak phase g and CP-conserving relative strong phase d • Interference if D0/D0 decay into identical final state • CP-eigenstate decay: Gronau-London-Wyler (GLW) • Doubly-Cabibbo-suppressed (DCS) decay: Atwood-Dunietz-Soni (ADS) • Dalitz plot analysis of 3-body decay, e.g., : Giri-Grossman-Soffer-Zupan (GGSZ) G. Finocchiaro @ CSN1 Napoli 2005

  6. It all depends on rB… • Sizable interference only if large enough amplitude ratio • Unfortunately, BABAR finds small rB • Error on g vs. rB • rB≈0.12  30o error on gw/ current BABAR data  need to add more channels/data From CKM factors & color suppression G. Finocchiaro @ CSN1 Napoli 2005

  7. Right Sign Wrong Sign ~90 events ~4 events WSB+ WSB- mES (GeV/c²) New GLW and ADS signals in hep-ex/0507002, submitted to PRL hep-ex/0508001 DCS decay CP-eigenstate decay D0→flavour non-CP B+ D0 CP+→K+K-, p+p- B+ B- B- D0 CP-→KSp0, KSw, KSf B+ B+ B- B- NCP+=37.6±7.4 NCP-=14.8±5.9 G. Finocchiaro @ CSN1 Napoli 2005

  8. m2- D0 D0 m2+ +rBei(-g+dB) A(B-)=|A(B→D0K-)|× m2- m2+ GGSZ DP analysis of • The idea in pictures: • CP-conjugate B- and B+ decay amplitudes • g is the same, r(*) and d(*) depend on the mode Assume D decays conserve CP… G. Finocchiaro @ CSN1 Napoli 2005

  9. DP analysis of D0/D0 decays hep-ex/0507101 • Extract D0(bar) decay amplitudes from DP analysis of independent cc sample with flavor-tagged decays from • New K-matrix model: 9 BW resonances + K-matrix formalism for  s-wave • Deals with broad, overlapping, multi-channel scalar resonances 91fb-1 82k D0s G. Finocchiaro @ CSN1 Napoli 2005

  10. 227×106 BB Mode Signal events ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ B-D0K− 282 ± 20 D0K- D*0[D00]K- D*0[D0]K- ~ ~ B-D*0[D00]K− 90 ± 11 ~ ~ B-D*0[D0]K− 44 ± 8 ~ B-D0K*−[K0Sp-] 42 ± 8 ~ B-D0K*−[KSp-] NEW Signals in all modes hep-ex/0504039, accepted by PRL hep-ex/0507101 G. Finocchiaro @ CSN1 Napoli 2005 (mES>5.27 GeV/c²)

  11. ~ ~ ~ D0K- D*0K- D0K*- 2sCL g(deg) 1s CL (stat.+syst. uncertainties) 2 fold (±p) ambiguities for bothganddB rB r*B .rs (<0.75@2s CL) GGSZ DP results: g vs. r(*)B hep-ex/0507101 all D()K() modes combined: g=(67±28stat±13syst±11DP)o G. Finocchiaro @ CSN1 Napoli 2005

  12. BABARonly:: Putting it all together… • … we can measure g!!!! • 3 theoretically clean (= w/o penguins) methods to measure g • did not mention TD D(*)rp… (no new measurement) • Small r()Bvery hard measurement, but no longer “mission impossible” • No single channel dominates • To improve precision, need more data/channels G. Finocchiaro @ CSN1 Napoli 2005

  13. B0B0mixing Tree decay Penguin decay g  b b→uud UT angles from TD asymmetries Preamble: CPV from interference of decay and mixing • Specific example is for , but valid in general • Single CKM phase in decay ↔ Cf=0 (no direct CPV) G. Finocchiaro @ CSN1 Napoli 2005

  14. a=p-(b+g) κpp a and the penguins: more triangles are needed • Difficult to reliably estimate how much penguins contribute • B(B0K+p-) (~ pure penguin) indicates they cannot be neglected • Gronau/London analysis • Assuming isospin symmetry, these triangular relations between the Bhh amplitudes hold: • The B and B triangles do not match, and 2aeff = 2a+κpp • Need to measure 5 BFs, including B(B0p0p0) from tagged samples • still a 8-fold ambiguity • Grossman/Quinn bound:

  15. Measuring a in B→rr decays • Tough analysis [VV state, (p0p+)(p0p-), r’s are wide] • However: (~6 times x B→pp) (isospin triangle collapses to a line) • Small penguin contribution: |a-aeff|<11o@ 68%CL (almost pure CP-even state) 232M BB PRL 95 041805 (2005) G. Finocchiaro @ CSN1 Napoli 2005

  16.  from B→pp/rr/rp decays • All three modes give consistent and complementary measurements of  • constraint rather weak due to large penguin contamination • rryields single most precise constraint • TD analysis of 3 Dalitz plot in rp. Weak constraint at 90% CL, but disfavors rr mirror solution near 170o G. Finocchiaro @ CSN1 Napoli 2005

  17. α VtdVtb* VudVub* γ β VcdVcb* UT sides: |Vub| Tree-level process (charmless semileptonic) • NP free • ‘complementary’ (opposite in the UT) to sin2b BF(b→u l n) measured from inclusive and exclusive s.l. branching fractions • From inclusive (partial) s.l. BFs using O.P.E. • reliable prediction of totalB→Xuℓn decay rate • experiment measures partial BFs (hard cuts against B→Xcℓn) • biggest uncertainty in extrapolation of BF(b→u ln) to full phase space from motion of b quark in B meson • Parameters measured e.g. from E*g in b→sg PRD72 052004 (2005) G. Finocchiaro @ CSN1 Napoli 2005

  18. 89MBB signal region sideband region hep-ex/0506036 submitted to PRL signal 232MBB hep-ex/0507017 Inclusive |Vub| measurements 88MBB • Electron endpoint spectrum • Electron and n momentum • Lepton and hadronic system recoiling against fully-reconstructed B mesons hep-ex/0408075, being submitted to PRD G. Finocchiaro @ CSN1 Napoli 2005

  19. LQCD LCSR |Vub| from exclusive measurements: untagged Bpℓn 83M BB, hep-ex/0507003, subm. to PRD Exclusive s.l. BFs  |Vub| using form factors (FFs) in bins of q2 • several approaches LCSRs, LQCD, quark models … • FF uncertainties affect measurement twice • FF shape  acceptance  try and measure on data • FF normalisation in extraction of |Vub| from pBF (~10-15%) for -0.15<DE<0.25 GeV |Vub|=(3.82±0.14stat±0.22syst±0.11FF– 0.52FFnorm)x10-3 +0.88

  20. Incl. vs. Excl. : which wins? Indirect |Vub| determination Inclusive • Improved expt. error: 4% • Very much improved theory error ( OPE parameters): 6% • Exclusive • Improved expt. error: 4% • Theory error still dominant: ≥15% • Experimental input, i.e., FF shape, will reduce theory error in the future • Measurements now compatible within errors G. Finocchiaro @ CSN1 Napoli 2005

  21. Why this is relevant • constraints from TREE process only • Gauge the UT in any extension of the SM • Firm starting point for NP searches UTfit JHEP 0507:028,2005 G. Finocchiaro @ CSN1 Napoli 2005

  22. J/y BO KS sin2b from charmonium [to find NP, must know OP] • Reference point for NP • C=0 (only 1 phase) • S=-hfsin2b • Precise! • Validation of SM predictions • sin2b[UTFit]=0.793±0.033 (sides) [0.734±0.024 (all)] • In fact, a big success… New Belle meas. (357M BB): sin2b=0.652±0.044 G. Finocchiaro @ CSN1 Napoli 2005

  23. Why b→s penguins are good for NP • Small effects (e.g. from propagators of heavy particles circulating in the loop) more easily detectable since Tree is missing • CKM factors same as J/yKs • If single phase, SMpredicts: Speng=Scharmonium=sin2bCpeng=Ccharmonium=0 • Naïve [HFAG] average of penguin modes 2.7s below charmonium note: BABAR and Belle have ~same precision G. Finocchiaro @ CSN1 Napoli 2005

  24. To find NP, must know OP (II) • In fact, we know that > 1 amplitude/phase is (usually) involved • e.g., b→uus CS tree (g) in channels involving non-strange neutral mesons • Even J/yKs could have penguins • DS=0.000±0.017 [hep-ph/0507290] • Is there a dominant one? Intense theoretical work lately • Dsin2b always >0 (contrary to experiment) • some predictions quite precise • theory parameters constrained to measured BF (will further improve) • Averaging still not meaningful QCD factorization: [Cheng,Chua,Soni, hep-ph/0506268] [Beneke, hep-ph/0505075] Dsin2b G. Finocchiaro @ CSN1 Napoli 2005

  25. hep-ex/0507087 New signals (~230M BB) in [h,K+K-]KL0 hK0and K+K-K0 have largest BF among b→s modes • hKS0has smallest stat. error on sin 2b • hKL0adds 50% more events (1245±67 total) • ShK0=0.36±0.13±0.04, ChK0=-0.16±0.09±0.03 • SK+K-K0L=0.07±0.28±0.12, CK+K-K0L=0.54±0.22±0.09 • Using fCP-even =0.89±0.08±0.06 sin2bK+K-K0=0.41±0.18±0.07±0.11 hep-ex/0507016 G. Finocchiaro @ CSN1 Napoli 2005

  26. 2.7s? This could be one of the greatest discoveries of the century, depending, of course, on how far down it goes… CPV in b→s penguins • Intriguing difference from b→c remains G. Finocchiaro @ CSN1 Napoli 2005

  27. b→dg • Large background • Only accessible through exclusive modes Brg, wg • Simultaneous fit to B+→r+g, B0→r0g, B+→wg assuming Belle claim observation hep-ex/0408034 G. Finocchiaro @ CSN1 Napoli 2005

  28. α VtdVtb* VudVub* γ β VcdVcb* UT sides: |Vtd/Vts| • Constraint used to come entirely from Dmd/Dms • (smaller theoretical uncertainty on ) • Now radiative penguins sufficiently precise to start providing meaningful UT constraints, using: • Low B→r/w gBF favors small |Vtd| FF ratio z2=0.85±0.1 Ali et al., Eur.Phys.J.C23:89-112,2002 difference in dynamics DR 0.10.1 DR=0 in this plot G. Finocchiaro @ CSN1 Napoli 2005

  29. 6.1σ 2.5 σ JPC= 1 : y(2S), y(3770), … New States: X(3872)→J/yp+p- • Discovered by Belle in 2003 in • 3872 is just above open-charm threshold • Confirmed by D0, CDF, BABAR • isovector  charged partner(s) must exist • ruled out @10-4CL by BABAR in B0(+)→X+K-(0) • searched in B0(+)→X0(J/yp+p-)K0(+) decays • Need more data to discriminate among different models • Does not fit in standard charmonium spectroscopy • why does not decay onto DD? • J/yr isospin violating (but is a r?) • [qq][qq] [Maiani et al. PRD71, 014028 (2005)]: R=1, Dm=7±2MeV/c2 • D*0D0 molecule [PRD71, 074005 (2005)]: R<0.1 • Search in ISR events R=BF(B0→XKS)/BF(B±→XK±)=0.5±0.3±0.05 Dm=2.7±1.3±0.2 MeV/c2 G. Finocchiaro @ CSN1 Napoli 2005

  30. y(2S) ...no sign of X(3872) in ISR, but... hep-ex/0506081 • Discover Y(4260)→J/yp+p-!! 232fb-1 Peak cross section ~50pb • Just above DSDS threshold • Could be two states Very robust signal. Among other tests: • Split by run, J/y decay mode • search in J/y sidebands • require gISR (25% of events) • change/reverse selection • feed-down e.g. from undetected p0 • Use y(2S) for optimisation/validation • fit for null signal with • different bkgd shapes • bin sizes • check for reflections

  31. Where else? Y(4260) No trace in R-scan • shad=(14.2±0.6) nb • sY~50pb • accuracy of R~4% • no surprise it‘s not seen in R • But why a dip? • And why does not decay to DD? √s (GeV) • Feeble signal (so far) in • B-→J/yp+p-K- • 3.1s, assuming mISR, wISR • need more data G. Finocchiaro @ CSN1 Napoli 2005

  32. Summary & outlook • CPV in mixing↔decay (and decay) well established • Precision in measurements of CKM parameters steadily improving • The Standard Model resists (surprisingly well…) • New states keep popping up in unexpected places • renewed interest in spectroscopy, new models proposed and being scrutinized • Finding NP is the name of the game now • Deviations from sin2b in b→s penguin getting smaller (~1s for most modes) • In general, processes with clear SM predictions are good candidates • B→tn around the corner? 2008 (?) 2005 G. Finocchiaro @ CSN1 Napoli 2005

  33. g from B→DK sin2b in penguins • from rr The next few years • Statistical uncertainties have scaled so far faster than (adding new channels) • Even for J/yKs systematics not an issue, for several ab-1 yet • Theory often feeded by exptl. measurements • also improves with more data • Expected precision on UT angles vs. time: G. Finocchiaro @ CSN1 Napoli 2005

  34. Our analysis commitments BaBar in Italia Milano: analisi dipendenti dal tempo in decadimenti senza charm e misure di BF (h()K/p, h()KS/L, h()w, h()f, hh, hh,a1p, h()K/Ksg) Torino: decadimenti senza charm a due corpi (pp, Kp, KK), Vub (recoil) Trieste: B→D*D*,Vcb (B→D*ln), BD(*)DsJ ° ° ° ° Genova: charmonio (B cc  adroni, B cc[hCg]K), t  mg Padova: Vcb (B→D*ln), Vub, vita media e mixing del B,t→mg, CPV nel mixing ° o ° Ferrara: Vub, Vcb e charmonio sul rinculo Pisa: sin2b/CP/CPT, vita media del t, t→Kspp0n,DK Dalitz per l'estrazione di g,b→sg inclusivo, B→D*ln, B→D0CPK(p0), B→D*tn ° Perugia: BD*DS*, DSfp, tmg, CPV dal lato di tag, CPV nel mixing ° ° ° ° Roma I: sin(2b+g), BDSp/K, DKS, b→sg sul rinculo, mixing del B, X(3872), Vub, DK Dalitz per l'estrazione di g, decadimenti senza charm e analisi dipendenti dal tempo per l'estrazione di a (pp, Kp, KK), t→mg, sin2b dai pinguini (fKS, fKL, KSKSKS ,K+K-KL,KSp0, K*g), B→fK+ LN Frascati: BD*D*,BD*DS*, DSfp, gISRK*+K-, gISRfh/p0, CPV nel mixing Napoli: Vcb (B→D*ln), B→J/yK/p, B→tn, decadimenti semileptonici Bari: decadimenti a 3 corpi della D, DsJ*(2317)+, DsJ*(2460)+ (analisi di Dalitz) G. Finocchiaro @ CSN1 Napoli 2005

  35. Backup slides G. Finocchiaro @ CSN1 Napoli 2005

  36. L-scaling of channels for angles measurements G. Finocchiaro @ CSN1 Napoli 2005

  37. How NP would be constrained • NP (assuming only in loops) parameterised as From tree measurements G. Finocchiaro @ CSN1 Napoli 2005

  38. N=45±10 N=57±14 hep-ex/0507005, preliminary • sensitive to relative contribution of -, Z-penguin and box diagram • new physics can show up in any of these Event yields in 229M BBbar smallest BF from B’s measured to date! RK = 1.06  0.48  0.05 [SM:~1] RK*= 0.93  0.46  0.12 [SM:~0.75] ACP(K)=-0.08 0.22 0.11 [SM:~0] ACP(K*)=+0.03 0.23 0.12 [SM:~0] soon to come: forward-backward asymmetry G. Finocchiaro @ CSN1 Napoli 2005

  39. K*(890) non-K* hep-ex/0507038, submitted to PRL 232M BB B→Ksp0g • Phase in B→K*0 g between mixed and unmixed decay is 2 • W couples only to left-handed quark: b→sL • interference suppressed in SM: Smix -2ms/mb sin2b -0.04 sin2 • possibly large enhancement from NP • can use Ks0 even if not from resonance (Atwood et al (2004)) Compatible w/ SM Errors still large G. Finocchiaro @ CSN1 Napoli 2005

  40. B→tn • CKM fit predicts • Direct measurement of fB (currently only from LQCD) • B→tn /Dmd constraints |Vub/Vtd| • > 2 n in the event. Analysis: • Use hadronic or semileptonic tag • 1 or 3 prong topology • Can constrain SUSY parameters We’re almost there! G. Finocchiaro @ CSN1 Napoli 2005

  41. (NP in) b→d/s g • FCNC • sensitive to NP @ EW scale • solid SM predictions: • BF(B→Xsg)=(3.6±0.30)10-4 • ACP~0 • Huge backgrounds • cuts on g or Xs spectra ↔ model dependence • Fully inclusive (no requirement on Xs/d) • lepton tag [/1200 on Bkg (/20 on Sig)] • topology cuts, p0h vetoes • Exclusive (semi-inclusive) b→sg • reconstruct Xs→K+np+mp0 (n,m<5) • 38 states,55% of all possible G. Finocchiaro @ CSN1 Napoli 2005

  42. Partial Branching Fractions (PBF) B rest frame (4s) frame b→d/s g spectra, BF, ACP Inclusive Semi-inclusive ACP(b s g+ b d g) = (- 0.010 0.115 0.017 ) hep-ex/0506043 LP Paper-100 hep-ex/0403004 G. Finocchiaro @ CSN1 Napoli 2005

  43. favored suppressed favored suppressed rD=0.060±0.003, from D*+[K± p] p+ rB~0.1÷0.3 0.93±0.04 g from B-[K+p-]K-: ADS method • Equalize the interfering amplitudes (PRL 78, 3257) • Extract g from decay rates measurements G. Finocchiaro @ CSN1 Napoli 2005

More Related