550 likes | 566 Views
This article discusses the recent findings from RHIC regarding relativistic heavy ion collisions, including insights from Au+Au and d+Au collisions, lattice QCD at finite temperature, bulk particle production, and more.
E N D
Recent Results from RHIC Carl Gagliardi Texas A&M University Outline Introduction to relativistic heavy ion collisions What have we learned in Au+Au collisions? In the “low-pT” regime In the “intermediate-” and “high-pT” regimes What did we see in d+Au collisions? Carl Gagliardi – QNP 2004
Lattice QCD at finite temperature Ideal gas (Stefan-Boltzmann limit) F. Karsch, hep-ph/0103314 Critical energy density: TC ~ 175 MeV eC ~ 1 GeV/fm3 Carl Gagliardi – QNP 2004
RHIC: the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider Carl Gagliardi – QNP 2004
z x Geometry of heavy ion collisions Number of participants: number of incoming nucleons in the overlap region Number of binary collisions: number of equivalent inelastic nucleon-nucleon collisions Both depend on impact parameter or “centrality” Carl Gagliardi – QNP 2004
Paddles/BBC ZDC ZDC Au Au Paddles/BBC Central Multiplicity Detectors 5% Central Paddle signal (a.u.) STAR Experimental determination of centrality Carl Gagliardi – QNP 2004
pT distribution of charged particles nucl-ex/0401006 Systematic Errors not shown Carl Gagliardi – QNP 2004
Bulk particle production in Au+Au PRL 91, 052303 130 GeV 200 GeV 19.6 GeV Central dNch/dh Peripheral h • Central collisions at 200 GeV: 5000 charged particles (!) • Energy density: boost invariant hydrodynamics (Bjorken) (R ~ A1/3, t = 1 fm/c) Central Au+Au at 130 GeV: e = 4.6 GeV/fm3 (PHENIX, PRL 87, 052301) Carl Gagliardi – QNP 2004
z y x Azimuthal anisotropy: “elliptic flow” py px Initial coordinate-space anisotropy Final momentum-space anisotropy Elliptic term Carl Gagliardi – QNP 2004
Kolb and U. Heinz (2002) Hydrodynamic fits Radial flow Elliptic flow Obtain reasonable simultaneous description with the QGP equation of state predicted by lattice QCD. Carl Gagliardi – QNP 2004
STAR HBT interferometry versus reaction plane nucl-ex/0312009 • Geometrical analog of v2 – confirms source anisotropy. • Note: Magnitudes of Rl and Ro/Rs smaller than predicted by hydrodynamic calculations. Carl Gagliardi – QNP 2004
Chemical equilibrium? Thermal model: Partition fn with params T, mB, ms, mI3 Fit to ratios of antiparticle/particle: , K, p, , , , K*0, …. Carl Gagliardi – QNP 2004
Phase diagram at chemical freeze-out Carl Gagliardi – QNP 2004
Hard partonic collisions and energy lossin dense matter Bjorken, Baier, Dokshitzer, Mueller, Pegne, Schiff, Gyulassy, Levai, Vitev, Zhakarov, Wang, Wang, Salgado, Wiedemann,… Multiple soft interactions: Gluon bremsstrahlung Opacity expansion: • Strong dependence of energy loss on gluon density glue: • measure DE color charge density at early hot, dense phase Carl Gagliardi – QNP 2004
jet parton nucleon nucleon Jets at RHIC Find this……….in this p+p jet+jet (STAR@RHIC) Au+Au ??? (STAR@RHIC) Carl Gagliardi – QNP 2004
Binary collision scaling p+p reference Partonic energy loss via leading hadrons Energy loss softening of fragmentation suppression of leading hadron yield Carl Gagliardi – QNP 2004
Au+Au and p+p: inclusive charged hadrons PRL 91, 172302 Carl Gagliardi – QNP 2004
Suppression of inclusive hadron yield Au+Au relative to p+p RAA Au+Au central/peripheral RCP PRL 91, 172302 • central Au+Au collisions:factor ~4-5 suppression • pT > 5 GeV/c: suppression ~ independent of pT Carl Gagliardi – QNP 2004
Binary scaling Factor of 4-5 PHENIX observes a similar effect with π0 PRL 91, 241803 PRL 91, 072301 p-p Au-Au Carl Gagliardi – QNP 2004
BRAHMS So doPHOBOS (h ~ 0.8) and BRAHMS (h ~ 2.2) PHOBOS: PL B578, 297 and PRL 91, 072302 BRAHMS: PRL 91, 072305 Also have h = 0 Carl Gagliardi – QNP 2004
M. Gyulassy, I. Vitev and X.N. Wang Azimuthal anisotropy and partonic energy loss Anisotropy at high pT is sensitive to the gluon density of the medium. Carl Gagliardi – QNP 2004
STAR Anisotropy vs. pT at 200 GeV Preliminary Preliminary Significant anisotropy in Au+Au at least up to 7~8 GeV/c Carl Gagliardi – QNP 2004
trigger Jets and two-particle azimuthal distributions p+p di-jet • trigger: track with pT>4 GeV/c • Df distribution: 2 GeV/c<pT<pTtrigger • normalize to number of triggers Phys Rev Lett 90, 082302 Carl Gagliardi – QNP 2004
? Azimuthal distributions in Au+Au Au+Au peripheral Au+Au central pedestal and flow subtracted Phys Rev Lett 90, 082302 Near-side: peripheral and central Au+Au similar to p+p Strong suppression of back-to-back correlations in central Au+Au Carl Gagliardi – QNP 2004
Other effects that might change RAA andRCP • Hadronic re-interactions • Change in particle production mechanisms • Initial- or final-state multiple scattering (“Cronin effect”) • Nuclear modifications of the parton distributions (“shadowing” and “anti-shadowing”) • Gluon saturation at high energy and low x Carl Gagliardi – QNP 2004
Final-state “pre-hadronic” plus hadronic rescattering Cassing, Gallmeister, and Greiner, hep-ph/0311358 May also have difficulty explaining high-pT v2 and near-side angular correlations Carl Gagliardi – QNP 2004
Baryons vs. mesons PHENIX: PRL 91, 172301 In central Au+Au collisions, baryons are substantially overproduced relative to mesons at intermediate pT Carl Gagliardi – QNP 2004
Hadronization via constituent quark recombination/coalescence From R. Fries, QM’04 Coalescence of partons into hadrons: Where does coalescence win over fragmentation? Assume Wab(1;2) = wa(1)wb(2) Exponental: fragmenting parton: ph = z p, z<1 recombining partons: p1+p2=ph Power law: Carl Gagliardi – QNP 2004
Constituent quark scaling at intermediate pT At intermediate pT, different baryon and meson v2 values may reflect a common underlying partonic flow. Carl Gagliardi – QNP 2004
STAR Limits of recombination/coalescence STAR: PRL 92, 052302 PHENIX: PRL 91, 172301 The “baryon enhancement” ends around pT ~ 5-6 GeV/c Carl Gagliardi – QNP 2004
Theory vs. data pQCD-I: Wang, nucl-th/0305010 pQCD-II: Vitev and Gyulassy, PRL 89, 252301 Saturation: KLM, Phys Lett B561, 93 PRL 91, 172302 RCP Final state Initial state pT>5 GeV/c: well described by gluon saturation model (up to 60% central) and pQCD+jet quenching Carl Gagliardi – QNP 2004
partonic energy loss Is suppression an initial or final state effect? Initial state? Final state? gluon saturation How to discriminate? Turn off final state d+Au collisions! Carl Gagliardi – QNP 2004
Inclusive spectra RAB If Au+Au suppression is final state 1.1-1.5 1 If Au+Au suppression is initial state (KLM gluon saturation: 0.75) ~2-4 GeV/c pT High pT hadron pairs broadening? pQCD: no suppression, small broadening due to Cronin effect saturation models: suppression due to mono-jet contribution? 0 suppression? /2 0 (radians) d+Au vs. p+p: Theoretical expectations Carl Gagliardi – QNP 2004
STAR d+Au inclusive yields relative to binary-scaled p+p STAR: PRL 91, 072304 • d+Au : enhancement • Au+Au: strong suppression Suppression of the inclusive yield in central Au+Au is a final-state effect Carl Gagliardi – QNP 2004
PHENIX, PHOBOS, BRAHMS find similar results PHOBOS PHENIX BRAHMS PRL 91, 072302/3/5 Carl Gagliardi – QNP 2004
Azimuthal distributions PRL 91, 072304 pedestal and flow subtracted Near-side: p+p, d+Au, Au+Au similar Back-to-back: Au+Au strongly suppressed relative to p+p and d+Au Suppression of the back-to-back correlation in central Au+Au is a final-state effect Carl Gagliardi – QNP 2004
Thestrong suppressionof the inclusive yield and back-to-back correlations at high pT observed in central Au+Au collisions are due to final-state interactions with the dense mediumgenerated in such collisions. Carl Gagliardi – QNP 2004
Phys Rev Lett 91, 072302/3/4/5 Carl Gagliardi – QNP 2004
1 + (g pQCD direct x Ncoll) / gphenix backgrd Vogelsang NLO 1 + (g pQCD direct x Ncoll) / gphenix backgrd Vogelsang, mscale = 0.5, 2.0 1 + (g pQCD direct x Ncoll) / (gphenix pp backgrd x Ncoll) Direct photons preliminary AuAu 200 GeV Central 0-10% Direct photons aren’t suppressed in central Au+Au collisions. Another demonstration that suppression is a final-state effect Carl Gagliardi – QNP 2004
STAR Back-to-back correlations vs. reaction plane preliminary 20-60% central Near-side correlations: independent of orientation Back-to-back correlations: suppressed more strongly when the path length is longer Carl Gagliardi – QNP 2004
Mid-rapidity vs. forward rapidity Mid-rapidity spectra tend to sample quarks and gluons in the incident nuclei at: In contrast, forward spectra tend to sample quarks at large x and gluons around: Carl Gagliardi – QNP 2004
BRAHMS RdAu at different pseudo-rapidities Statistical errors dominate over systematic at =2 and 3 Systematic error (not shown) ~15% nucl-ex/0403005 and preliminary Possible evidence that gluon saturation is important forforward physics at RHIC Carl Gagliardi – QNP 2004
Have we found the Quark Gluon Plasma at RHIC? We now know that Au+Au collisions generate a medium that: • is dense (pQCD theory: up to ~100 times cold nuclear matter) • is dissipative • exhibits strong collective behavior This represents significant progress in our understanding of QCD matter We have yet to show: • hydrodynamics can describe spectra, v2, and HBT simultaneously • direct evidence the system is thermalized • chiral restoration • a transition occurs: can we turn the effects off ? There is still work to do Carl Gagliardi – QNP 2004
Rapidity: Invariant cross section: Kinematics for colliders Pseudo-rapidity: for m/p << 1 Transverse momentum (pT)and(pseudo-)rapidity (y or ) provide a convenient description Carl Gagliardi – QNP 2004
Zhang, Gyulassy, Ko, PL B455 (1999) 45 Free-streaming does not convert spatial anisotropy to momentum anisotropy Developed early (t < 2 fm/c) Why is elliptic flow interesting? Sensitive to the physics of constituent interactions at early time Carl Gagliardi – QNP 2004
BRAHMS Particle spectra and radial flow • Fit Au+Au spectra to blast wave model: • S (surface velocity) drops with dN/d • T (temperature in GeV) almost constant. Blue y=0 Red y=1 y= 0 T 1 and 3 contours preliminary An explosive expansion? pT (GeV/c) Carl Gagliardi – QNP 2004
RAA 2 1 0 0 2 4 pT (GeV/c) Suppression of inclusive yield at 130 GeV STAR, PRL 89, 202301 PHENIX, PRL 88, 022301 Both STAR and PHENIX see significant suppression Limitation: Ambiguities in the reference spectra at 130 GeV Carl Gagliardi – QNP 2004
RAA different for charged hadrons and p0 ? Charged Hadrons p0 PHENIX PRL 91, 072301 STAR PRL 91, 172302 For pT less than ~5 GeV/c, charged hadrons are less suppressed in central Au+Au collisions than p0 Carl Gagliardi – QNP 2004
Baryons vs. mesons – yet another view K* (and maybe ) follow K0S -- Ξ (and maybe Ω) follow Λ Carl Gagliardi – QNP 2004
Final state “pre-hadronic” and hadronic scattering • Calculations based on the idea of “color transparency” • Hard-scattered parton neutralizes its color, then propagates as a color-neutral object • The object grows into a well-defined hadron during a “formation time” tf. The interaction cross section grows over the same period. tf Calculations use: Carl Gagliardi – QNP 2004