240 likes | 253 Views
This research study explores different methods for measuring membrane capacitance (Cm) in multi-compartment cells and investigates the impact of cell morphology on the results. Three experimental techniques were used and compared in crab stomatogastric neurons. The findings suggest that the current step method provides the most accurate measurement of Cm. The voltage ramp method also yielded reliable results, while the voltage step method was less reliable. The study concludes that cell morphology plays a significant role in Cm measurements.
E N D
The Measurement of Cell Capacitance in Multi-compartment Cells Arif Patel Arlene Pineda Chris Khalil
Membrane Capacitance • Cell membranes have a capacitive property. • Membrane capacitance (Cm) is related to cell surface area. • Cm plays a role in neuronal physiology.
Hypothesis • The Problem: Different methods for measuring Cm produce different results. • We propose that this difference is due to the complex anatomical structure of neurons.
Methodology • Three experimental techniques for measuring Cm • Current Step Method (current clamp) • Voltage Step Method (voltage clamp) • Voltage Ramp Method (voltage clamp) • Three levels of modeling to compare the measurements • Experiments were performed in crab stomatogastric neurons.
Current Step Method • When performed in an isopotential sphere
Current Step Method • When performed in multi compartment cells
Results of Experiments • Average Measured Capacitance for three methods: • Current Step (n=6): 23.68nF • Voltage Step (n=8): 2.87nF • Voltage Ramp (n=8):2.72nF Why are they different? Which is correct?
Dendrite Soma Dendrite Soma Three Models • Dual compartment attached by a resistive cable • Compartmentalized cable with added membrane • Two cylinder with compartmentalized dendrite and cable • Assumptions for model simplification: • -Ri, Rm, Cm constant • -Vr=0
Soma Dendrite Dendrite Soma Total Capacitance Percent Actual Capacitance=
IAD IAS IRD IRS IRS IAD IAD IRD Current Representation
Dual Compartments w/ Compartmentalized Cable D2=.004 cm Dsoma=.004 cm Ri Ri Dendrite Soma j -1 j j +1 Rm Rm l=.06 cm Dcable=.001 cm
Dual Compartments w/ Compartmentalized Cable Code j j-1 j+1 Ri Ri Rm Rm Rm
Dendrite Soma Percent Actual Capacitance vs. Dendrite Area
Soma Dendrite Percent Actual Capacitance vs. Soma Area
Dendrite Soma Percent Actual Capacitance vs. Cable Area
Two Cylinders w/ Compartment Cable & Dendrite Dsoma=.004 cm Soma j -1 j j +1 jd-1 jd j j jd+1 jd+1 jd+1 l=.06 cm Dcable=.001 cm Dendrite
Percent Actual Capacitance vs. Dendrite Area Dendrite Soma
Significance of Findings • The best method for measuring cm is the current step • Voltage curve can depicts two distinct processes • Independent of morphology
Significance of Findings • Voltage Ramp method has provided better results than Voltage Step. • Voltage Step has provided the least reliable results • Not allowed to equalize in voltage clamp
Special Thanks to.. • Professor Golowasch • Professor Nadim • Professor Bose • TA’s: • Shunbing Zhao • Lakshmi Chandrasekaran