110 likes | 231 Views
Civil Rights Movement. Summary and Modern Concerns. Thus Far . . . Focus on Rights of African-Americans Factors in Change: Electoral Strength Organization (NAACP) Working within the system – lobbying, litigation Grassroots – protests, boycotts, civil disobedience Changing Public Opinion
E N D
Civil Rights Movement Summary and Modern Concerns
Thus Far . . . • Focus on Rights of African-Americans • Factors in Change: • Electoral Strength • Organization (NAACP) • Working within the system – lobbying, litigation • Grassroots – protests, boycotts, civil disobedience • Changing Public Opinion • National Leadership (Truman, Kennedy, Johnson)
Changes • Court’s Interpretation of 14th Amendment • Strict Scrutiny for “Suspect Classification” of Race • Compelling government interest • Means narrowly tailored • Legislation • Civil Rights Act of 1964 • Voting Rights Act of 1965 • Fair Housing Act
Contemporary Issues:Other Racial and Ethnic Minorities • Latinos • Asian Americans • Native Americans
What Is “Affirmative Action”? • Race-conscious policies designed to increase opportunities for women and minorities • Goals: • Remedying the effects of past discrimination by the organization creating the policy • Remedying the effects of discrimination in earlier stages of education, training, and employment • Increasing diversity within the organization creating the policy
Arguments in Favor of AA • Discrimination is class-based, so remedy should be as well • Provides a catalyst for eliminating institutional and social inequalities • Creates a diverse educational or labor force which is (arguably) inherently more productive
Arguments Against AA • “Conservative” Arguments • Our system is supposed to reward individual achievement, regardless of group membership • We cannot overcome group-based discrimination by perpetuating group-based decisions • “Critical Race/Gender Theory” • Creates the impression that minorities/women cannot achieve on their own merits (actually undermines tolerance) • Encourages “tokenism” and creates the illusion that discrimination is “fixed”
Affirmative Action and the Equal Protection Clause • When we’re talking about AA policies by governments as employers or educators • Race conscious policy => strict scrutiny • Compelling government interest • Narrowly tailored means for achieving that interest
AA in State Education: The Michigan Cases • Undergrad • Points awarded for all sorts of “desirable” characteristics • Points given for membership in certain racial minorities • Law School • “Mushy” admissions • Race may or may not count, no idea of how much
The Michigan Cases • Amicus briefs supporting the Michigan policies • 65 American businesses • 3M, Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Eli Lilly, Coca-Cola, etc. • Officers and civilian leaders of the U.S. military • Wesley Clark, Norman Schwarzkopf, Anthony Zinni
What the Court Said • Compelling Interest • Diversity in education is a compelling interest • Narrowly Tailored Means • Mechanical treatment of race is not acceptable • Law school’s “individualized” analysis is o.k. • Undergrad’s point system is not o.k. • Similarly, straight quotas and set-aside programs are not o.k.