130 likes | 145 Views
Electronic On-Board Recorders. The Canadian Perspective August 2011. CCMTA. Darren Christle BA, CITT, P.Log, MCIT Executive Director Motor Carrier Division Province of Manitoba. BC - British Columbia NB - New Brunswick AB - Alberta NS - Nova Scotia
E N D
Electronic On-Board Recorders The Canadian Perspective August 2011 CCMTA Darren Christle BA, CITT, P.Log, MCIT Executive Director Motor Carrier Division Province of Manitoba
BC - British Columbia NB - New Brunswick AB - Alberta NS - Nova Scotia SK - Saskatchewan PE - Prince Edward Island MB - Manitoba NF - Newfoundland ON - Ontario NT - Northwest Territories QC - Quebec YT - Yukon Territories NU - Nunavut Territories Yukon Northwest Territories Nunavut NF BC AB MB QC ON SK NS PE NB
Mandate from Council of DMs • Council directed CCMTA to examine issues related to electronic on-board recorders (EOBRs)
Current Environment Proliferation of Products and Different Formats No Current North American Standard Challenges – Inspectors Reading Data US 2010 Rule – Non-Compliant Carriers CTA concerned & calling for mandatory EOBRs to level playing field
CCMTA Review Undertook a literature review Developed a discussion paper Solicited stakeholder input with key considerations • Application and implementation (scope) • Data requirements and privacy • Technically flexible or specific approach • Phase-in period
Consultation • Input received from: • Carrier Organizations: CTA, Private Motor Truck Council, Motor Coach Canada • Owner Operator Independent Drivers Associations • Canadian Construction Association • Truck Manufacturers Association • Ontario Provincial Police • Manufacturers
Options • Do Nothing – Continue to allow industry to adopt on a voluntary basis • No cost to industry • No requirement to develop standard • Inconsistent with US Option 1 • Develop targeted approach – direct to carriers in non-compliance with Hours of service • Similar to US approach • Targeted toward worst offenders Option 2
Options (cont.) • Develop standard leveraging key aspects of US Rule • Utilizes work undertaken in US • Opportunity for CDN standard • Compatibility with US approach • Implementation can be independent or harmonized with US Option 3 • Develop universal mandate • Increased compliance with Hours of Service • Levels the playing field • Would force carriers to accept costs of EOBRs Option 4
Important Note Canadian stakeholders divided on universal vs. remedial approach
Council of Ministers Approval: • Option 3: Develop a Canadian standard for EOBRs leveraging the work already undertaken in the US • Incorporates key elements of US rule • Provides Canada the flexibility to consider compatibility with the US • Direct CCMTA to continue to monitor US rulemaking and implementation for Canadian carriers
Current Environmental Scan • CCMTA has awarded a contract to FP Innovations Ltd. to develop a Canadian National Safety Code (NSC) standard on EOBR’s for CMV use in Canada. • $80,000 • The RFP referenced four deliverables • Deliverable 1 : Outline key elements of the standard; • Deliverable 2 : Preliminary draft of the standard; • Deliverable 3 : Final draft; • Deliverable 4 : Final standard.
QUESTIONS? Canadian Council of Motor transport Administrators Standing Committee on Compliance & Regulatory Affairs2323 St. Laurent Blvd.Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1G 4J8 Phone: 613.736.1003 Fax: 613.736.1395 Email: ccMTA-Secretariat@ccmta.ca