240 likes | 377 Views
ESD 113 Superintendents’ Meeting Tumwater, August 21, 2013. 2013-15 Operating Budget: K-12 Education Funding. 2011-13 Budget Revised May 2012 (Dollars in Millions). Source: Senate Ways & Means Cmte, 1/13. 2013-15 Budget Situation. November forecast: $900 million shortfall *
E N D
ESD 113 Superintendents’ Meeting Tumwater, August 21, 2013 2013-15 Operating Budget:K-12 Education Funding
2011-13 Budget Revised May 2012 (Dollars in Millions) Source: Senate Ways & Means Cmte, 1/13
2013-15 Budget Situation • November forecast: $900 million shortfall* • March forecast: $1.3 billion shortfall* • Revenue: up $40 million • Caseload: up $301 million • Brackendecision: $160 million loss • June forecast:$1.0 billion shortfall* • Revenue/Caseload: up net $320 million *Projections do NOT include $1.0-2.0 billion required McCleary down payment
McCleary v. State • Supreme Court rules (January 2012): • The State “has consistently failed” to provide the ample funding required by the Constitution. • “Reliance on levy funding to finance basic education was unconstitutional 30 years ago in Seattle School District, and it is unconstitutional now.” • Supreme Court Orders State to: • “demonstrate steady progress” under ESHB 2261; and • “show real and measurable progress” towards full Article IX, Section 1 compliance by 2018.
SHB 2776 Resource Phase-in 8 Source: OSPI, 5/10
2013-15 Basic Education Enhancements Source: Article IX Litigation Cmte, 7/13
Additional K-12 Education Enhancements Source: Article IX Litigation Cmte, 7/13
K-12 Education “Savings” and Reductions Source: Article IX Litigation Cmte, 7/13
McCleary v. State Implementing McCleary
Education Funding Task Force Adopted McCleary Spending Plan Source: Joint Task Force on Education Funding, Final Report, 12/12
Initial McCleary Investment 2013-15 Operating Budget Initial McCleary Basic Education Investment 2013-15 Operating Budget
McCleary v. State What are the REAL Implementation Costs?
Real and steady progress towards full funding --as testified by the State in McCleary-- Source: Network for Excellence in Washington Schools, 11/12
Real and steady progress towards full funding vs. Joint Task Force spending plan 21 Source: Network for Excellence in Washington Schools, 3/13
Learning Assistance Program ESSB 5946—Improving Student Outcomes • Adds reduction of disruptive behavior as a condition to serve • OSPI and WSIPP must develop menus of “best practices” • Required to be published by July 1, 2015 • Required to be used by districts by 2016-17 • Districts required to prioritize the LAP funds to first serve grades K-4 reading • Readiness to Learn program consolidated with LAP; districts allowed to use LAP funds to continue RTL programs
Learning Assistance Program • Requirement to submit LAP plans is repealed • Beginning SY 2014-15, districts must report annual entrance and exit performance data for LAP students in CEDARs • Beginning Aug 1, 2014, districts must annually report to OSPI: • Academic growth for LAP students; • Number of students who gained at least one year of growth; and • Specific LAP practices and activities in each school • OSPI must compile district data and annually report performance gains • OSPI must monitor effectiveness of LAP practices and offer technical assistance.
Daniel P. Steele Assistant Executive Director, Government Relations 825 Fifth Avenue SE Olympia, WA 98501 360.489.3642 dsteele@wasa-oly.org ESD 113 Superintendents’ Meeting