160 likes | 317 Views
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Capital Investment Plan FY 2012/13 and 2013/14. Metropolitan Water District of Southern California. Regional water wholesaler to 6 counties covering 5,200 square miles
E N D
Metropolitan Water District of Southern CaliforniaCapital Investment PlanFY 2012/13 and 2013/14
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California • Regional water wholesaler to 6 counties covering 5,200 square miles • Serves 19 million people = 50% of the state’s population with projected population growth ~170,000 people/year • Regional economy $1 trillion • Supplies about half of all regional retail demands • Includes 26 member agencies
Where Southern CaliforniaGets its Water Water Banking / ExchangesTransfers & Storage Los Angeles Aqueduct Colorado River Aqueduct Supplies SWP Supplies Conservation Local Supplies Groundwater & Recycling
Metropolitan Distribution System 830 miles of pipeline and tunnel 242 miles of aqueduct 5 major treatment plants 7 pumping plants Older than 50 yrs – Mills 1978 Skinner 1976 Jensen 1972 Weymouth 1941 Diemer 1963
Metropolitan Water District of Southern CaliforniaAnnual Capital Expenditures (adjusted to 2011) Colorado River Aqueduct CRA and Dist. System Expansion $ Million
Metropolitan Water District of Southern CaliforniaAnnual Capital Expenditures (adjusted to 2011) Colorado River Aqueduct CRA and Dist. System Expansion State Water Project $ Million
Metropolitan Water District of Southern CaliforniaAnnual Capital Expenditures (adjusted to 2011) Ozone Retrofit, San Diego 6, Skinner Plant Expansion Diamond Valley Lake, Inland Feeder, Ozone Retrofit $ Million
Metropolitan Water District of Southern CaliforniaAnnual Capital Expenditures (adjusted to 2011) Infrastructure Reliability $ Million
Capital Investment Plan FY 12/13 – 13/1420 - Year Period: 1995/96 – 2014/15 $ Million
Colorado River AqueductCopper Basin Reservoir Sluiceway valve access
Diemer Water Treatment PlantOxidation Retrofit Program Diemer WTP – January 2012
Future CIP Trends for Metropolitan • Manage numerous projects of smaller scope • Infrastructure rehabilitation for operating facilities • Limited shutdown opportunities/durations • 2-fold increase in capital projects from 1996 to 2012 • Enhance/adopt project management and implementation capabilities • Implementation of large-scale capital projects through mutually beneficial partnerships • Joint financing • Water agencies • Sanitation Districts • Power Utilities