270 likes | 783 Views
Diagnostic Criteria of Conduct Disorder. A. A repetitive and persistent pattern of behavior in which the basic rights of others or major age-appropriate societal norms or rules are violated, as manifested by the presence of three (or more) of the following criteria in the past 12 months, with at lea
E N D
1. Conduct Disorder University of Utah, Department of Educational Psychology
Training School Psychologists to be Experts in Evidence Based Practices for Tertiary Students with Serious Emotional Disturbance/Behavior Disorders
US Office of Education 84.325K
H325K080308
2. Diagnostic Criteria of Conduct Disorder A. A repetitive and persistent pattern of behavior in which the basic rights of others or major age-appropriate societal norms or rules are violated, as manifested by the presence of three (or more) of the following criteria in the past 12 months, with at least one criterion present in the last 6 months:
3. Diagnostic Criteria of Conduct Disorder Aggression to people and animals
often bullies, threatens, or intimidates others
often initiates physical fights
has used a weapon that can cause serious physical harm to others (e.g., a bat, brick, broken bottle, knife, gun)
has been physically cruel to people
has been physically cruel to animals
has stolen while confronting a victim (e.g., mugging, purse snatching, extortion, armed robbery
has forced someone into sexual activity
4. Diagnostic Criteria of Conduct Disorder Destruction of property
has deliberately engaged in fire setting with the intention of causing serious damage
has deliberately destroyed others’ property (other than by fire setting)
Deceitfulness or theft
has broken into someone else’s house, building, or car
often lies to obtain goods or favors or to avoid obligations (i.e., “cons” others)
has stole items of nontrivial value without confronting a victim (e.g., shoplifting, but without breaking and entering; forgery)
5. Diagnostic Criteria of Conduct Disorder Serious violations of rules
often stays out at night despite parental prohibitions, beginning before age 13 years
has run away from home overnight at least twice while living in parental or parental surrogate home (or once without returning for a lengthy period)
is often truant from school, beginning before age 13 years
The disturbance in behavior causes clinically significant impairment in social, academic, or occupational functioning
If the individual is 18 years or older, criteria are not met for Antisocial Personality Disorder
You must specify age of onset and severity
6. Other Diagnostic Considerations Must rule out Oppositional Defiant Disorder
Determine if behavior is “proactive” or “reactive”
Determine “overt” or “covert” behavior
Overt behaviors are those that confront or disrupt the environment: aggression, temper tantrums, arguing
Covert behaviors are those that may not be directly noticed by a caregiver: stealing, fire starting, lying
7. Comorbid Disorders and Other Considerations ADHD
Anxiety
Depression
Somatization
Academic Achievement, Substance Abuse, Risky Sexual Behavior
8. History of Conduct Disorders(Mash & Barkley, 2006) How societies deal with “bad” children goes back in history to Plato 2,500
Historical accounts from religious, medicine, and legal field
CD has been in the DSM since the second edition, but has changed as to the diagnostic requirements over the years
There has been an increase of juvenile delinquency in the last 50 years
More females
Peak age was mid-adolescence, but is now late adolescence
Increase in proportion of violent crime to non-violent crime
9. Causes/Contributory Factors (Mash & Barkley, 2006; Frick, 2001) Multidimensional interaction among causal mechanisms
Individual vulnerabilities
Difficult temperament
Neuropsychological
Problems in child rearing (substance abuse, marital distress/divorce, parental antisocial behavior, low social support)
Stressors in the general social ecology
10. Assessment of Conduct Disorder Structured interviews
Behavior rating scales (BASC, CBCL, ASEBA, ECBI, etc.)
Functional behavior assessments
Personality tests (MMPI-A, MACI)
Behavior observations
Developmental/medical history
Use multiple measures to get more comprehensive data
11. Treatment Options for Conduct Disorder (Mash & Barkley, 2006; Frick, 2001) Family-based interventions (parent training)
Short-term effects
Helping the Non-compliant Child (HNC)
Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT)
Incredible Years
Triple P- Positive Parenting Program
OLSC Training Program
Multisystemic Therapy (MST)
Functional Family Therapy (FFT)
12. Treatment Options for Conduct Disorder(Mash & Barkley, 2006; Frick, 2001) Skill Training
Social Skills
Cognitive Behavioral Skills Training
Problem-Solving Skills Training
Anger Management
Coping-Competence Programs
Multicomponent Skills Training
13. Treatment Options for Conduct Disorder (Mash & Barkley, 2006; Frick, 2001) Community-Based Programs
The Achievement Place Program (Teaching Family Model)
Treatment Foster Care
Case Management
Day Treatment
School-Based Treatment
Classroom Management
Involvement in Multicomponent Treatments
14. Treatment Options for Conduct Disorder (Lilienfeld, 2005) “Get tough” approaches
Scared Straight
Boot Camp
Attachment therapies
Rebirthing, holding, reparenting
Psychopharmacological Treatment
Antipsychotics
Mood Stabilizers Medication should not be considered stand-alone treatmentMedication should not be considered stand-alone treatment
15. Treatment Options for Conduct Disorder (Lilienfeld, 2005) Scientifically Questionable Treatments (SQT’s)
Peer-group interventions
“get tough” approaches
Attachment therapies
Psychopharmacological as a stand-alone treatment “get tough” approach - Scared Straight actually significantly worsens symptoms of CD“get tough” approach - Scared Straight actually significantly worsens symptoms of CD
16. Recent Research Study for CD Parent training for young Norwegian children with ODD and CD problems: Predictors and mediators of treatment outcome. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, (2009),50, 173-181.
Authors: Fossum, S., Morch, W., Handegard, B., Drugli, M.B., & Larsson, B.
17. Recent Research Study for CD Method
121 subjects
Subjects’ Inclusion Criteria
Ages 4- 8
Parent referral for conduct problems
Child does not have a debilitating physical impairment
Child’s behavior was within clinical range on the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECHI) based on Norwegian norms
Child meets diagnostic criteria (DSM-IV) for ODD and/or CD
If children met one less criterion than that reqired for diagnosis and they displayed severe conduct problems, they were still included
18. Recent Research Study for CD Treatment conditions
Random Assignment to one of three conditions
Parent training (n=47)
Parent training combined with child training (n=52)
Waiting list condition (n=28)
Subject characteristics in the two active treatment conditions
Mean age was 6.6 years (SD=1.3)
28 children (28.3%) lived in one-parent families
Step parent involved in 18 families (18.2%)
6 children (6.1%) living in foster care
Of which, 2 (2%) were in kinship foster care
2 families (2%) not native-speaking Norwegians
19. Recent Research Study for CD Assessments
ECBI
Kiddie-SADS diagnostic interview with mother
Teacher questionnaires
Dyadic Parent-Child Interaction Coding System-Revised (DPICS-R) to observe parent-child interactions
Preschool Behavior Questionnaire (PBQ)
Teacher Report Form (TRF)
Parental Stress Index (PSI)
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)
Parenting Practices Interview (PPI) (adapted version)
20. Recent Research Study for CD Treatment: IY intervention program (Webster-Stratton, C.)
BASIC parent training condition
Aim is to strengthen families and promote parent competencies by increasing their positive and self-confidence in parenting, reduce negative parenting practices, improve parents’ problem-solving skills and anger management, and improve school involvement
Divided into groups of 10-12 parents (parents of approx. 6 children)
Met weekly for 12-14 weeks for 2 hours with 2 accredited therapists
Watched 250 video vignettes of parent-child interactions
Therapists led discussions about aspects of vignettes
Parents received home tasks and and parents shared experiences at the beginning of next session
On average, parents attended 92% of meetings (M=11.2, SD=1.6)
21. Recent Research Study for CD Treatment (cont.) IY intervention program & the “Dinosaur School”
Parent training and child training combined
Met simultaneously at clinic, but groups were held separately
Approximately 6 children met for 2 hours weekly, 18-20 weeks
2 therapists
Video-based program with 100 video vignettes of children in multiple settings
Fantasy play with life-size puppets (a boy, a girl, various animals)
Exercises sent home with children
Attendance in child sessions was an average of 91% (M=15.6, SD=1.9)
22. Recent Research Study for CD 2 families (2%) dropped out
Both males and from Parent Training condition
15 therapists for PT, 9 therapists for children
Trained in programs
Followed treatment manual
Completed standardized checklists
Tracked group activities
Sessions videotaped for peer, self, and trainer evaluation
23. Recent Research Study for CD Outcome Variables
Child functioning at home
Independent observation of negative parenting
Child behaviors in day care or school
Results
37 (39.8%) rated responders and 56 (60.2%) non-responders, significant difference between mean scores
30 mothers (34.1%) achieved 30% or greater reduction in observed negative parenting, 58 (65.9%) non-responders
28 children (32.6%) scored below cut-off (rated by teacher) but difference was not significant Responders scored below cut-off at post, non-responders still above cut-off at postResponders scored below cut-off at post, non-responders still above cut-off at post
24. Recent Research Study for CD Results (cont.)
Logistic regression analyses
Independent variables of ADHD, female, and maternal stress predicted worse outcome
Treatment effects lower than original study (not uncommon)
Post-treatment: two-thirds of children scored within norms
No child or family variables predicted unfavorable outcomes
Limitations of the study
Parental factors not controlled for
Parents more neutral interactions when observed than U.S. parents
25. References American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4thedn. Text Revision). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.
Fossum, S., Morch, W., Handegard, B., Drugli, M.B., & Larsson, B. (2009). Parent training for young Norwegian children with ODD and CD problems: Predictors and mediators of treatment outcome. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 50, 173-181.
Frick, P.J., Kamphaus, R.W., Lahey, B.B., Loeber, R., Christ, M.A., Hart, E.L., &Tannenbaum, L.E. (1991). Academic underachievement and the disruptive behavior disorders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology; 59, 2, 289-294.
Lilienfeld, S.O. (2005). Scientifically unsupported interventions for childhood psychopathology:A summary. Pediatrics, 115; 761-764.
Mash, E.J. & Barkley, R.A. (2006). Treatment of Childhood Disorders (3rd edn). New York: The Guilford Press.