230 likes | 352 Views
13 th Symposium on Development and Social Transformation. Panel 16: Administrative Reform In The United States Friday, April 21 st (2:10-3:10pm). 13th Symposium on Development and Social Transformation. Panel 16: Administrative Reform In The United States.
E N D
13th Symposium on Development and Social Transformation Panel 16: Administrative Reform In The United StatesFriday, April 21st (2:10-3:10pm)
13th Symposium on Development and Social Transformation Panel 16: Administrative Reform In The United States Deregulation Of The Telecommunications Industry And Its Effects On Message DiversityBrenna Holmes
The Deregulation of the U.S. Telecommunications Industries: How Increased Corporate Mergers & Vertical Integration has Affected Message Diversity & Democracy By Brenna Holmes
Outline • How Message Diversity Affects Democracy • Background Info: 1934 & 1996 Acts • Definitions of Jargon • The “Corporate Filter” Effect • The Future Trends
Diverse Messages lead to Diverse Ideas. Diverse Ideas lead to Healthy Debate. Healthy Debate leads to an Educated Public. An Educated Public leads to a more Democratic Society.
Corporate Mergers lead to fewer Owners. Fewer Owners lead to fewer Points of View. Fewer Points of View lead to Homogenous Thinking. Homogenous Thinking leads to Public Complacency. Public Complacency leads to a Loss of Public Power. Loss of Public Power leads to a Submission to the owners ideas
Background • The U.S. defaults to trusting/wanting a PCM • Telecom infrastructure creates a natural monopoly & bottlenecks in distribution • 1996 Telecommunications Act • Massively deregulated television and radio industries, allowed cross-industry mergers, increased audience viewership control and vertical integration
Vertical Integration & Synergistic Mergers • Cross-Industry & Synergistic Mergers • Allows media companies to own or control multiple methods of message distribution & to cross promote. • TV stations own radio stations, own cable networks, own wireless phone services, own ISPs, own newspapers, magazines, and book publishers, etc. • Vertical Integration • Allows production, distribution & sales to be owned & controlled by one company. • Universal Pictures & Universal Theaters
The “Corporate Filter” Effect • The majority of what we see, hear, & read is biased to promote or at least not offend the parent company’s views and interests.
The Future • Digital broadcasts (DTV). Mandated switch by 2009. A little known gift from Congress to the broadcast stations in the ‘96 Act. • Broadcasters promise multicasting, but w/out public scrutiny, it may not happen. • GE may sell NBC, if allowed who buys it? • Could be Time Warner (1st broadcast station), Disney (2nd: ABC), News Corp. (2nd: Fox), or Viacom (2nd: CBS).
Sources • The Project for Excellence in Journalism www.stateofthemedia.org/2006 • Columbia Journalism Review www.cjr.org/tools/owners • Global Issues: Corporate Influence in the Media www.globalissues.org/humanrights/media/corporations/owners • I Want Media: News & Resources www.iwantmedia.com/consolidation Thank You
13th Symposium on Development and Social Transformation Panel 16: Administrative Reform In The United States Congressional Ethics Commission: Yes or No?Daniel Kelley
Congressional Ethics Commissions: Yes or No? • Daniel Kelley
Should Congress appoint an Ethics Commission? • What is an Ethics Commission? • What is the purpose of a commission? • What would be its strengths and weaknesses? • Should Congress appoint one?
Ethics Committees • Senate Select Committee on Ethics (6 Senators). • House of Rep. Committee on Standards and Official Conduct (14 Representatives). • Part of the Congress and members have other duties as Congressmen and woman. • Critics complain that they are inactive and ineffective. • Conflict in judging people you rely on to do your job.
Ethics Commission • Senate Bill S.2259, Office of Public Integrity, as offered by Illinois Senator Barak O’Bama. • Independent Congressional Ethics Enforcement Commission. • Composed of 9 members chosen in bi-partisan way (1 former judge & 1 former member of Congress). • Modeled after Commissions that serve in Kentucky, Florida, and Tennessee. • Currently there are Ethics Commissions serving in 39 state legislatures.
Purpose of Proposed Commission • Act Independent of but serve both Senate and House of Representatives. • Investigate lobbying disclosures. • Investigate lawmakers and staff who violate restrictions on interactions with lobbyists. • Conduct research concerning government ethics and initiate education programs. • Initiate investigations regarding ethics violations and refer them to Senate ethics committees. • Issue advisory opinions to help inform ethics in decision making. • File annual reports with Congress that disclose all activities.
Possible Strengths of Having a Commission • Singleness of purpose-- not distracted by duties other than ethics related charter. • Promotes ethics internally through education and advisory opinions. • Promotes externally through powers to investigate. • Supposedly independent. • Many state commissions promote transparency in GOV. with annual reports and advisory opinions that are published online (Florida, Texas, Tennessee).
Discernable weakness • Congress must retain its power to discipline its own members. • Constitution requires that senate “determine the rule of its proceeding, punish its members for disorderly behavior, and with concurrence of two-thirds vote, expel its members [Sect. 5 article 2]. • State commissions have survived constitutional challenges because ethics committees were still in tact. • Congress must appoint the commission, establish its purpose, and will control its finances. • Any commission will be vulnerable to retaliation by those it is compelled to judge.
History in State Legislatures shows retaliation to be the rule • Kentucky Ethics Commission initiated 18 investigations in first year and its powers to investigate were rescinded by the Kentucky Legislature • Similar situations occurred in Rhode Island, Connecticut, and Hawaii • Texas Ethics Commission was not funded for 4 years • Legislators who get investigated have posted bills to have commissions abolished. • Beth A Rosenson in her book, Shadowlands of Conduct, researched 26 state ethics commissions and found that all but two commissions lost power over time
Recommendations • Don’t authorize an Ethics Enforcement Commission at this time but don’t abandon the idea. • Explore ways to increase independence first (I.E. would a constitutional amendment be required). • Establish best way to utilize commission strengths like ethics education, advisory opinions, and central accessible storage of ethics information and disclosure reports. • Don’t authorize a commission that is compelled to bite the hand that feeds it. • Any commission will need continuous public support.
13th Symposium on Development and Social Transformation Panel 16: Administrative Reform In The United States Political-Bureaucratic Communications And US Social Security ReformMatt Guardino
13th Symposium on Development and Social Transformation Panel 16: Administrative Reform In The United States Friday, April 21st (2:10-3:10pm)