400 likes | 590 Views
Clash of the titans: Colloids versus crystalloids. Eric A J Hoste Intensive Care Unit Ghent University Hospital Belgium. Are we asking the correct question?. The FEAST study Febrile illness, Africa N = 3141 + 29. Maitland et al. N Engl J Med 2011. Relevant question.
E N D
Clash of the titans: Colloids versus crystalloids Eric A J Hoste Intensive Care Unit Ghent University Hospital Belgium
Are we asking the correct question? The FEAST study Febrile illness, Africa N = 3141 + 29 Maitland et al. N Engl J Med 2011
Relevant question Finfer et al SAFE TRIPS, Crit Care 2010
Why would you choose colloids? Fast shock reversal = survival • EGDT! Less volume < IAH/ACS
Why would you choose colloids? Fast shock reversal = survival • EGDT! Less volume • < IAH/ACS • < ARDS
Why would you not choose colloids? Cost Side effects • Acute Kidney Injury • Coagulation abnormalities • … Worse Survival
“The review of trials found no evidence that colloids reduce the risk of dying compared with crystalloids”
Limitations of the meta-analysis Heterogeneity • Cohorts: non-ICU, burns, sepsis, trauma, … • Products: • Alb 4, 5, 20, 25% • HES 6, 10%, 1st, 2nd, 3rd generation • Saline, Ringer’s • … Small studies
The SAFE study : Albumin 4% N = 6,997 patients The SAFE study investigators N Engl J Med 2004
Subgroups? The SAFE study investigators N Engl J Med 2004
Traumatic Brain Injury No to albumin N = 460 patients GCS 3-8 Myburgh et al. N Engl J Med 2007
Severe sepsis? N = 919/1218 Yes to albumin Finfer et al. Intensive Care Med 2011
EARSS: Albumin 20% in septic shock Results • Albumin concentration • All individual organ dysfunctions equal • Same outcome at 28-d N = 794 patients No Benefit Abstract ESICM Berlin 2011
HES 200, 10% vs. Ringer’s N = 537 patients Brunkhorst et al, VISEP study. N Engl J Med 2008
HES 200, 10% vs. Ringer’s N = 537 patients Brunkhorst et al, VISEP study. N Engl J Med 2008
HES 130, 6% PRCT, N = 130 P = NS P = NS mortality Guidet et al. CRYSTMAS, abstract ESICM 2011
Acute Kidney Injury N = 52, PRCT Brain dead kidney donors N = 129, PRCT Severe sepsis/septic shock AKI = creat x 2 or RRT Schortgen et al. Lancet 2004 Cittanova et al. Lancet 1996
HES 200, 10% N = 537 P = 0.002 P = 0.001 Brunkhorst et al, VISEP study. N Engl J Med 2008
CRYSTMAS: HES 130, 6% vs. saline Guidet, Abstract ESICM Berlin 2011
Albumin and AKI SAFE study: No difference in duration of RRT EARSS study: No difference in organ dysfunction Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis: Albumin = less AKI Sort et al. N Engl J Med 1999 Hepatorenal syndrome: Albumin improves HRS Ortega et al. Hepatology 2002
Coagulation tests? Multivariate analysis: aPTTassociated with: • Albumin (p=0.01) • Large volume (p=0.03) N = 687 3 units of the SAFE study group Bellomo et al. Crit Care Resusc 2009
So, • Survival is better or worse or equal • AKI is equal or more (> older HES) • Coagulation abn: yes But: What about volume & early shock reversal?
N = 237 656 mL fluid/d less Less wound infections Less pacing More need for plasma (p=0.048) EARSS, abstract ESICM 2011 Magder et al. Crit Care Med 2010
Take home messages • Cost Crystalloid: 5 to 25 times lower • Survival: equal • Alb 4%: survival in severe sepsis • HES 200: Survival when high volume HES 200 • Side effects: • AKI: HES 200 • Coagulation ≈ volume! • Don’t throw the baby out with the bad water
Thank You Eric.Hoste@Ugent.be
Relevant question Finfer et al SAFE TRIPS, Crit Care 2010
Acid-Base? N = 691 3 units Multivariate analysis: >3 L fluid resuscitation Cl: alb>saline Bellomo et al. Crit Care Med 2006
Better when albumin is low? Finfer et al. BMJ 2006
Acute Kidney Injury Zarychanski et al. Open Med 2009