90 likes | 195 Views
« Pro-poor » regulation for small towns water supply services : lessons learned from financial and technical auditors in Chad, Mali and Niger. Janique Etienne, AFD mars 2009.
E N D
« Pro-poor » regulation for small towns water supply services : lessons learned from financial and technical auditors in Chad, Mali and Niger Janique Etienne, AFD mars 2009
« Pro-poor » regulation for small towns water supply services : lessons learned from Chad, Mali and Niger experiences • Regulatory mechanism to ensure efficient and reliable service provision for small towns • Context • Household revenus are around 3 $/day • Low coverage - Service level is predominantly standposts • Higher Tariffs : no cross-subsidy between towns and between consumers • Community managed systems : « volunteer » managers are often inefficient and ineffective • Lack tranparency
« Pro-poor » regulation for small towns water supply services : lessons learned from Chad, Mali and Niger • Set up • Water authority designates a third party as auditor • A number of municipal councils sign an agreement with this third party to conduct technical and financial audits • Role • Technical and financial data collection • Small providers support (users associations or SSIPs) • Water quality testing • Financial audit • Reporting to a general assembly of users
Ministry Mandate Water authority Local government Agreement Delegatedmanagementcontract Auditor NGO, consultant, Lmt Co Provider Associations or entrepreneurs Support and control users
« Pro-poor » regulation for small towns water supply services : lessons learned from Chad, Mali and Niger • Observation • Misappropriation of funds by providers • High commercial and technical losses • Unpaid water bills by government services (136 MEuros in Mali -2006-) • Results • Improve transparency through reporting, • Improve performance via benchmarking • Ensure water quality through technical audit
« Pro-poor » regulation for small towns water supply services Auditor CCAGMoundouTCHAD BCCMaradi NIGER GCS-AEPMALI Revenues 20 to 40 FCFA/m3 35 000 € 17 500 € 76 000 € Nb of users(Nb of centres) 265 000(30) 150 000(20) 450 000(59) Water revenus (Providers) 900 000 € 450 000 € 2 500 000 € Asset value 14 M€ 8 M€ + 20 M€
« Pro-poor » regulation for small towns water supply services : raises questions for scaling up • Extend such mechanisms ?... To strengthen : • Négociations between local governments and water providers • Feedback to consumers (through general assembly of consumers) • Competition to increase transparency • Monitoring of water quality (compliance)