1 / 21

Alternative approaches to transversity: how convenient and feasible are they ?

Alternative approaches to transversity: how convenient and feasible are they ?. Villa Olmo (Como), 7 - 10 Sept 2005. ! how important for transverse spin studies. Marco Radici. Pavia. In collaboration with: A. Bacchetta (Univ. Regensburg) A. Bianconi (Univ. Brescia).

sonel
Download Presentation

Alternative approaches to transversity: how convenient and feasible are they ?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Alternative approaches to transversity: how convenient and feasible are they ? Villa Olmo (Como), 7 - 10 Sept 2005 !how important for transverse spin studies Marco Radici Pavia In collaboration with: A. Bacchetta (Univ. Regensburg) A. Bianconi (Univ. Brescia)

  2. Some alternative ways to transversity search for chiral-odd partner of h1 constraint: leading twist process initial state polarized Drell-Yan (DY) : DIS : final state Collins effect semi-inclusive annihilation : Interference Fragmentation Functions

  3. Drell-Yan HESR@GSI: always valence quarks higher statistics COMPASS ? Collins-Soper frame (P.R. D16 (’77) 2219) c.m. energy invariant mass parton momenta in plane DIS regime

  4. Leading twist cross section D. Boer, P.R. D60 (’99) 014012 Tangermann & Mulders, P.R. D51 (’95) 3357 fitted against data (Conway et al., P.R. D39 (‘89) 92) MC Asym h1? Sivers

  5. Generate the asymmetry cross sect. Summing upon qT, , x1, for some fixed S1 and S2 for each x2´ xp accumulate events with F[, S1, S2] > 0 $ U F[, S1, S2] < 0 $ D SSA (x2) = (U-D) / (U+D) For assume flavor symmetry and select For each case, repeat simulation independently for 20 times ! build mean value and variance of SSA for each x2 and test when SSA (x) reflects the same differences within error bars ) extraction h1(x) , h1? (x) is statistically possible Bianconi & M.R., P.R. D71 (’05) 074014; hep-ph/0504261, P.R. D in press

  6. 8000 events with dilut. factor = 0.85 Bianconi & M.R., P.R. D71 (’05) 074014

  7. s » 200 (GeV)2 statistical error bars from 20 repetitions unambiguous extraction seems possible Bianconi & M.R., P.R. D71 (’05) 074014

  8. Monte Carlo sample Program ! total  for absorption of antiprotons per nucleon producing Drell-Yan event in the selected kinematics luminosity L x  = # of “good” Drell-Yan events per N and per sec. L=1031 (cm-2s-1)

  9. cross sect. s » 200 (GeV)2 statistical error bars from 10 repetitions unambiguous extraction seems possible Bianconi & M.R. in preparation

  10. Model assumptions for Sivers Anselmino et al. P.R. D71 (05) 074006 q = u,d hep-ph/0507181

  11. s » 200 (GeV)2 Anselmino et al. P.R. D71 (05) 074006 xF Anselmino et al. hep-ph/0507181 statistical error bars from 10 repetitions

  12. s » 200 (GeV)2 PRELIMINARY statistical error bars from 10 repetitions

  13. First message • combination of unpolarized / single- / double-polarized Drell-Yan with • antiproton beams can give information on h1(x), h1? (x) (violation • of Lam-Tung sum rule), and f1T? (Sivers) • at GSI the collider mode is highly preferable because for s ¼ 200 GeV2 • the phase space is more populated; • for luminosity 1031 (cm-2s-1) and 9 ¸ M ¸ 4 GeV a reasonable • statistics is reached after 3 months of data taking • at COMPASS in fixed target mode, s ¼ 200 GeV2 can be reached • with 100 GeV pion beams; • statistics of pion-induced events can be much better than antiproton • one ! more precise and unambiguous information

  14. Transversity from SIDIS :Collins effect generalized factorization scheme proof for Drell-Yan and low-pT SIDIS only (Ji, Ma, Yuan, P.L. B597 (’04) 299 ) ; universality “still under debate” ; evolution ? search for effects ! SSA , but surviving sdpT dPhT 2 hadron semi-inclusive process e p"! e’ (1 2) X p p"! (12) X .. asymmetry in the azimuthal orientation of pair plane suggested for the first time by Collins, Heppelmann & Ladinski, 1994 but no twist analysis nor quantitative calculations (see also Ji 1994) then Jaffe, Jin, Tang 1998! suggestion of SSA from interference of () partial waves Bianconi, Boffi, Jakob, M.R., 2000 ! complete twist-2 analysis and first model calc. Bacchetta, M.R.! partial wave expansion () L ; twist-3 ; pp collisions…

  15. Interference Fragmentation Functions for q ! (h1,h2) X with unpolarized h1,h2 (LM) (L’M’) Ph=P1+P2 R=(P1-P2)/2 functions of ( z,  =z1/z1+z2, Mh2, kT2, kT¢RT )! ( z, , Mh2 ) ( twist-2Bianconi, Boffi, Jakob, M.R., P.R. D62 (2000) 034008 ; twist-3Bacchetta, M.R., P.R. D69 (04) 074026; partial wavesP.R. D67 (03) 094002 )

  16. e p"! e’ (h1h2) X RT leading-twist d - no admixture with other effects - easier factorization proof ; universality - no specific weight ! easier SSA from e+e-! (+-)jet 1 (+-)jet 2 X (Boer, Jakob, M.R. P.R. D67 (03) 094003 ) AUT

  17. ep"! e’ (+-) X at leading twist (Jaffe, Jin, Tang, P.R.L. 80 (98) 1166) spectator model • no calculation of qI (z) • ,  stable particles • interference from - phase shifts only (M.R.,Jakob, Bianconi, P.R. D65 (02) 074031 ) spectator model uncertainty band from: • different fp / fs strength ratio • f1(x), h1(x) from spectator model • f1(x), h1(x)=g1(x) from GRV98 & GRSV96 • f1(x), h1(x) = (f1+g1)/2 from “ “ Trento conventions ! reverse sign!

  18. New model   form factor Breit-Wigner m, , m,  , mK0 , K0 from PDG + same for K0S fit parameters + h.c.

  19. [GeV] fit PRELIMINARY removes all elastic, single and double diffractive events ! only semi-inclusive def. of AUT

  20. predict PRELIMINARY f1, h1 from spectator model f1, h1=g1 from GRV98 & GRSV96

  21. Second message • extraction of transversity via IFF more convenient with respect • to Collins effect : • - integration upon PhT makes leading twist cross section very • simple: unpolarized term + transversity x IFF • no “contamination” with other (Sivers-like) effects • - factorization proof and evolution should be easier • interpretation of upcoming HERMES 2 semi-inclusive data • in terms of collinear fragmentation via IFF seems reasonable • and feasible • for COMPASS data work is in progress… • extraction of IFF from Belle data ; no asymmetric background from • hard gluon radiation • ! please, put it at top of shopping list !

More Related