1 / 28

Latent TB Infection on World TB Day 2014

Elizabeth A. Talbot MD Associate Professor, Deputy State Epi Infectious Disease & International Health Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth. Latent TB Infection on World TB Day 2014. Outline. World TB Day 2014 Relevant global and US epidemiology

sonel
Download Presentation

Latent TB Infection on World TB Day 2014

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Elizabeth A. Talbot MD Associate Professor, Deputy State Epi Infectious Disease & International Health Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth Latent TB Infection onWorld TB Day 2014

  2. Outline • World TB Day 2014 • Relevant global and US epidemiology • Top issues re: latent TB infection (LTBI) • Testing: Interferon gamma release assays (IGRAs) and tuberculin skin test (TST) • Treatment options • Operational tidbits

  3. 2013 Global Epi Snapshot • Number of new TB cases decreased to ~9M • India+China 40%, Africa 24% • 13% co-infected with HIV • 1.4 million people died from TB • Multi-drug resistant (MDR*) TB • 3.7% among new cases • 20% among previously treated • 9% of MDR is XDRTB** *MDR=resistance to H+R **XDR=MDR with resistance to FQ and injectable

  4. One-third of TB cases missed • 50% of ~1.1 million new cases of HIV-related TB missed • 75% with MDR-TB missed “Missed” = gap between estimated number who became ill with TB and the number notified to national TB programs

  5. 2013 US Epi Snapshot *MDR=resistance to H+R **XDR=MDR with resistance To FQ and injectable agent

  6. To control TB (and solve many of our testing dilemmas): Prioritize LTBI Testing for Those with Risk Factorsfor Development of TB

  7. Most US TB is Reactivated LTBI • >80% of US TB is result of reactivated LTBI • Data from representative survey of US pop showed 4.2% of persons screened 1999-2000 had LTBI • Two risk categories for reactivation TB • LTBI prevalence is increased: e.g., foreign-born persons • Rate of reactivation during LTBI is increased: e.g., HIV • Both risks are present: e.g., recent contact with case • Nearly all these cases can be prevented by treatment of LTBI Horsburgh& Rubin, NEJM 2011; 364 (154): 1441-8

  8. Targeted Testing • Identify, evaluate, and treat persons at high risk for • LTBI or • Progression LTBI to TB • If you test for LTBI, have strategy to evaluate and treat those found to be infected • Local health department is a resource CDC Core Curriculum

  9. High Risk for TB Exposure • Close contacts to TB • HCWs who serve people at high risk for TB • Persons who were born in or visit TB endemic areas • >40/100,000 population • Persons who work or reside in high-risk congregate settings • Prisons, LTCFs, shelters • Local populations at high risk for infection or disease • Drug users Horsburgh& Rubin, NEJM 2011; 364 (154): 1441-8

  10. High Risk for Progression from LTBI to Active TB • Plus, persons with certain other medicalconditions: • Silicosis • Carcinoma of head or neck • Gastrectomy or jejunoilial bypass Horsburgh& Rubin, NEJM 2011; 364 (154): 1441-8

  11. For best (and credible) patient care: Understand key features of LTBI Testing methods and interpretation

  12. Tuberculin Skin Test Do’s and Don’t’s *BCG: TB vaccine derived from M. bovis, most commonly given vaccine worldwide! • Do TST • Prior to immunosuppression • 8–10 weeks after prior negative TST for contact investigation • Health department does contact investigations • Don’t test • If previous positive result • Especially severe reaction • <6 weeks after live virus vaccine • Can be done at same time as vaccine • What if patient has history of BCG* vaccination? • IGRA is preferred because no cross reaction • But . . .

  13. Effect of BCG on TST reaction • BCG given in infancy (age <2) • 23 studies with 78,846 vaccinees • 6.3% positive TST • 1% positive TST after >10y • BCG given to older (age >2) • 11 studies with 4,026 vaccinees • 40% positive TST due to BCG • 20% positive TST after >10y Farhat, Menzies. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2006;10:1192-204

  14. False Positive LTBI Testing Results • Many persons who have positive screening result are at low risk for reactivation, and even the best screening test would identify many more false positive results than true positive results • Quantitative test results can help • TST induration • IGRA values • Patient considerations • Costs/risks/benefits of treating or not treating? • Help patient weigh, be honest about uncertainties, advise

  15. Do Which When? • Neither is Preferred • Recent contact to case • IGRA should be repeated at 8-10 weeks (like TST) • Data on timing of IGRA conversion not available • IGRA may be more sensitive than TST • Periodic screening (e.g., HCW) One is Preferred • IGRAs • History of BCG vaccination • For those with low rates of return for TST reading • Homeless, IVDA • TST • Children <5 • When other unavailable • Both is Justifiable* • When 1sttest is neg, but risk for progression is high • When 1sttest is pos, but more evidence is needed to encourage compliance • When IGRA is indeterminate, borderline or invalid • If suspect 1st test is wrong • *PPD may “boost” IGRA response. If you • do TST then IGRA, do it within 7d of TST

  16. The goal is treating LTBI to control TB: Updates regarding LTBI Treatment

  17. LTBI Treatment Regimens • *Preferred; **Intermittent treatment only with DOT; ***Rifabutin can be substituted

  18. Rifapentine (Priftin) • Rifamycinderivative developed in 1950s, marketed 1998 • Similar spectrum as rifampin, but with longer half-life for weekly dosing • For active TB treatment • Higher relapse rates • Difficulty complying with asynchronous regimen • Drug-drug interactions HIV protease inhibitors • New clinical trials underway for TB

  19. PREVENT TB: INH & Rifapentine for 12wks • INH for 9m vs. INH + RPT weekly for 12wks with DOT • Study population: 8,000 patients • TST+ close contacts 70% • Converters 25% • TST+ HIV or HIV with close contact 2% • TST+ with fibrotic changes 2% • Efficacy was similar • 0.19 v 0.43% developed TB disease • Completion rate higher • 82 v 69% • Cost higher $160 v $6, but may be cost-effective

  20. RPT+INH clearly non-inferior to INH monotherapy More pronounced in intention to treat analysis

  21. Recommendations • Equal alternative to 9m INH in ≥12y plus high risk for TB disease • Close contact • Converter • Fibrotic changes on CXR • HIV not on ART, otherwise healthy • Consider other patients on an individual basis • Children 2-11y can be considered, especially if unlikely to complete 9m plus high risk to progress to TB disease

  22. INH-RPT NOT Recommended • Children < 2 years old • HIV on ART • Pregnancy, or likely to become pregnant during treatment • Presumed INH or RIF resistance • Prior adverse reaction with INH or rifamycin

  23. Current LTBI Treatment Regimens • *Preferred; **Intermittent treatment only with DOT; ***Rifabutin can be substituted

  24. Programmatic Use of INH+RPT • 65/90 contacts chose INH+RPT • DOT at school, calls/texts/visits • Treatment completion similar • 94%-100% for 3 regimens • 4 did not complete HP; 1 each • HA+nausea • Rash+dizziness • F+aches • Unknown • “CDC collaborating with health departments and institutions for more data nationally”

  25. Summary • TB remains a global threat • In US, treatment of LTBI is key TB control strategy • Diagnosis of LTBI should • Target risk populations • Incorporate updated approaches using TST and IGRAs • Treatment options for LTBI now include 12 dose rifapentine-INH regimen • State and local health departments offer up to date epidemiology and medical consultation

  26. THANK YOU!! And thanks to my trusted colleagues at NH DHHS for their encouragement and expertise

More Related