60 likes | 74 Views
This study explores the shaping of the new EU remedies policy, highlighting the importance of past decisions. It discusses the risks of over-divestment, convergence with other agencies, trustee monitoring, and the impact of Form RM. Suggestions are provided for enhancing policy effectiveness.
E N D
THE NEW EU REMEDIES POLICY Michael Rowe
THE NEW EU REMEDIES POLICY • With the benefit of hindsight… • the importance on the Merger Remedies Study in shaping the new remedies policy is universally recognised • but if a review of the past better informs policy going forward, isn’t the logical place to start ex post facto review of the validity of past decisions? • an explicit commitment by the Commission to the type of review mooted in the Lear report would be welcome
THE NEW EU REMEDIES POLICY • The dangers of over-divestment • parties are incentivised by the new policy to err on the side of caution in formulating remedies • strict time-limits, especially in Phase I, allow limited opportunity for precise tailoring of remedies • in these circumstances, Commission should be sensitive to the dangers of over-divestment • loss of competition using assets that would otherwise be acquired • diminution of efficiencies and lost synergies • integration difficulties for divestee
THE NEW EU REMEDIES POLICY • Are there limits to convergence of policy with other agencies? • Commission insists on undertakings to address issues that are worldwide in scope, independently of the actions of other agencies • ‘Twas not always thus –Halliburton/Dresser (1998) • In practice, the Commission has proven flexible and pragmatic on timing, but there is scope for more transparency and greater convergence
THE NEW EU REMEDIES POLICY • Trustees – an endangered species? • Remedies Study is emphatic on the importance of monitoring trustees in ensuring the effectiveness of remedies • But the strictness of the Commission’s requirements in relation to capability and resources, conflicts of interest and remuneration operate severely to limit the available pool • Commission could take steps to enhance the prospects for new entry into this concentrated market by: • Taking a more flexible approach on conflicts of interest and remuneration • Increasing transparency and consistency
THE NEW EU REMEDIES POLICY • Form RM - a risk of repetitive strain injury? • Parties could not have keener incentives to provide the Commission with the information necessary to judge the suitability of the remedy • Irrespective of the policy on waivers, a Form changes the balance of the relationship between the Commission and the parties • A set of indicative guidelines would better respect the need for flexibility and the timing constraints inherent in the process