130 likes | 275 Views
UK Corporate Insolvency Law Recent Developments in Light of the Global Financial Crisis. Dr Michael Schillig School of Law King’s College London. 1. Overview. Cork Report, 1982; Insolvency Act 1986; Enterprise Act 2002 Administration Company Voluntary Arrangement Scheme of Arrangement
E N D
UK Corporate Insolvency Law Recent Developments in Light of the Global Financial Crisis Dr Michael Schillig School of Law King’s College London 1
Overview Cork Report, 1982; Insolvency Act 1986; Enterprise Act 2002 Administration Company Voluntary Arrangement Scheme of Arrangement Voluntary winding up by the creditors Compulsory winding up by the court
Overview Recent Developments • Pre-packaged administrations in the European context • The UNCITRAL Model Law in action • The anti-deprivation rule under scrutiny 3
Destination pre-pack Pre-pack administration • Pre-arranged sale of the business immediately on appointment of the administrator • Prior approval by creditors’ meeting or leave of the court is not required • Only ex post facto challenge by creditors 4
Destination pre-pack European Insolvency Regulation • Centre of main interests • Presumption in favour of the registered office • Eurofood: rebuttable by objective criteria ascertainable by third parties 5
Destination pre-pack Wind Hellas restructuring • Wind Hellas owned by Hellas II registered in Luxembourg • Hellas II moves COMI to England • Administrator sells the shares in Wind Hellas to Weather Finance • 1.4 billion EUR of junior (unsecured) notes remain with Hellas II
The UNCITRAL Model Law in Action Cross-Border Insolvency Regulations 2006 • ‘foreign representative’ may apply for recognition • as ‘foreign proceeding’ • which will be a ‘foreign main proceeding’ • if COMI is situated in the state of that proceeding
The UNCITRAL Model Law in Action Re Stanford Bank Ltd (in receivership) [2010] WL 605796 (CA) • US receivership: did not qualify as ‘foreign proceeding’ • Antiguan liquidation: did qualify as ‘foreign proceeding’ • DoJ/SFO restraint order 8
The UNCITRAL Model Law in action Re Stanford Bank Ltd (in receivership) [2010] WL 605796 (CA) • Pursuant to the Eurofood test, SIB’s COMI was in Antigua • Administrative priority for DoJ/SFO as this would save costs • Recognition as foreign main proceeding subject to restraint order
Anti-deprivation under scrutiny Pari passu principle and anti-deprivation rule • All unsecured creditors share the assets on a pro rata basis. • It is not possible to contract out of the Insolvency Act 1986. • An interest may be limited so that it comes to an end when the company goes into winding up.
Anti-deprivation under scrutiny Perpetual v BNY [2009] EWCA Civ 1160 N I BNY LBSF
Anti-deprivation under scrutiny Perpetual v BNY [2009] EWCA Civ 1160 • ‘flip’ from swap counter party priority to noteholder priority • LBSF’s charge has been subject to the ‘flip’ from the start • Anti-deprivation rule does not apply • But: LBSF v BNY, Bkrtcy SDNY 2010: ‘flip’ as unenforceable ipso facto clause
Conclusion • Overall well equipped • Emphasis on party autonomy • UNCITRAL Model Law as effective tool • Concerns about pre-packs: race to the bottom? 13