180 likes | 284 Views
What does Independence mean for a Small Open Economy ? The Exercise of Irish Economic Sovereignty in Long-Term Perspective. Frank Barry School of Business Trinity College Dublin Economic Aspects of Constitutional Change Edinburgh, 19-20 September 2013. Outline.
E N D
What does Independence mean for a Small Open Economy?The Exercise of Irish Economic Sovereignty in Long-Term Perspective Frank Barry School of Business Trinity College Dublin Economic Aspects of Constitutional Change Edinburgh, 19-20 September 2013
Outline • The exercise of fiscal autonomy • Monetary autonomy • Migration policy • Some thoughts on the current economic crisis in Ireland
Political independence for many newly established states is associated with an attempt to diversify away from or otherwise reduce economic dependency on the former hegemon or colonial power.
“One of the central thrusts of Irish economic policy… has been to reduce the country’s trade dependence on the UK. Policy initiatives with this aim in mind have included EU entry in 1973, the break with sterling in 1979 and subsequent entry of the Irish pound into the European Monetary System, support for the establishment of the Single European Market in 1992, and adoption of the euro in 1999” • Official policy statement on Irish foreign economic policy (Forfás, 2003)
The radical use of fiscal autonomy in the trade sphere (with tariff protection giving way to export and FDI incentivisation) would eventually lead to diversification away from Britain
In 1979 the two hegemons (the future eurozone and the UK) diverged, and Ireland was forced to choose • Was the introduction of the euro really about the Single Market, or was it instead a federalist project? • The sterling link was not entirely broken as yet • Ireland devalued 3 times within the ERM (1983, 1986 and 1993), each time in response to sterling weakness
Government-comissioned report into the costs and benefits of EMU membership (1996) • “Whatever other derogations Ireland may have received over the years, they are as nothing compared with failure to join the EMU. Such a result would entail risks which are hard to evaluate, but may be considerable”. • Outsiders may be penalised in a downturn. Required assistance may be less forthcoming.
De Grauwe (1998) warned of the increased risks of banking crises and contagion unless regulatory and prudential control of banking were centralised at supra-national level. • Also warned that failure to create a European government with similar responsibilities to current national ones “creates the risk of the break-up of the monetary union”.
The reduced role of the Commission in governance of EMU also seems not to have been appreciated.