40 likes | 53 Views
Reflecting on a successful project at the University of Portland School of Engineering, discussing what worked well, what went wrong, and offering valuable recommendations for future projects. Topics include waterfall design process, technologies used, team communication, and more.
E N D
Team Enterprise:Biggerfoot Textbook Exchange Post Mortem Review Wednesday, April 27 University of Portland School of Engineering
What Worked Well • Waterfall design process • Technologies: • PHP • MySQL • JavaScript • CSS • HTML • Team communication • Pair programming • Dr. Ward’s advising University of Portland School of Engineering
What Went Wrong • Very few small problems • Scheduling • MS Project • Office reinstall on lab build • Lack of network access in 314A • No real big problems • Due to good design and planning University of Portland School of Engineering
Recommendations • Document what you are NOT going to do and why • Then if suggested later, you will know why you aren’t going to do it • Finish bulk of Theory of Operations document before winter break • Start of spring semester – get going on good start • Do thorough design • Keep backups • Version control for web-based projects University of Portland School of Engineering