130 likes | 139 Views
Pension Reform in Poland in the Context of Worldwide Reforms – the Challenges for the Future. Michał Rutkowski The World Bank Wars aw , May 29, 2009. Before the reform. Before the reform the pension system in Poland was: --N on-Actuarial , -- Pay-As-You-Go , -- Defined Benefit
E N D
Pension Reform in Poland in the Context of Worldwide Reforms – the Challenges for the Future Michał Rutkowski The World Bank Warsaw, May 29, 2009
Before the reform... Before the reform the pension system in Poland was: --Non-Actuarial, --Pay-As-You-Go, --Defined Benefit --With no choice for participants
The reform…. • The reform was a move towards a system that is: • Actuarial • Funded, • Defined Contribution • Allowing for choice by the participant The objective was a mixed, diversified system – “Security through Diversity”
„Security through Diversity” • „Security through Diversity” applies to all four dimensions: • NON-ACTUARIAL -- ACTUARIAL • PAYG-- FUNDED • DEF. BENEFIT - DEF. CONTRIBUTION • NO CHOICE - CHOICE
Diversification • Actuarial - Non-Actuarial 70:30 • Funded -PAYG 35:65 • Def. Conrib. - Def. Benefit 80:20 • Choice – No Choice 35:65
After the reform... • Diversified system, structurally healthy • Discussions about the threshold for social security contributions, minimum pension level, or the size of the funded part do not affect the structure of the system
Quality of the new system • Quality of its “actuariality” • Quality of its funding • Quality of the defined-contribution approach • Quality of the real choices for participants
“Actuariality” • Ensuring the right to pension in both parts of the system • Office of the chief actuary • Using demographic projections • Estimating the real tax wedge • Popular understanding of the system
Quality of the funded component • Administrative constraints • Freedom of choice • Investing abroad
Defined contribution? • Who bears the risk? • The role of guarantees
Choice • Real or fictitious? • Who chooses? Chooses among what? • Similarities and differences of those who choose and those who are chosen
Reforms in the world: same direction • Europa: “old” and “new” • United States • Reforms elsewhere
Remaining fundamental challenges • Payouts from the new system • Increasing the coverage of the new system • Other?