1 / 11

Deconstructing Standard 2b GAPSC Assessment Workshop Georgia Gwinnett College

This workshop at Georgia Gwinnett College focuses on systematic data collection, analysis, and evaluation for program improvement and monitoring individual student progress. It explores the use of multiple sources of data and the importance of data analysis for program improvement. Participants learn about the assessment system and how to use appropriate information technologies to maintain the system.

stach
Download Presentation

Deconstructing Standard 2b GAPSC Assessment Workshop Georgia Gwinnett College

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Deconstructing Standard 2b GAPSC Assessment Workshop Georgia Gwinnett College Susan Brandenburg-Ayres (sayres@northgeorgia.edu) Kathy Moody (kmoody@northgeorgia.edu) North Georgia College and State University May 16, 2012

  2. Data Collection, Analysis and Evaluation • Systematic data collection, analysis and evaluation for: • Program Improvement • Monitoring individual student progress

  3. Example: • Standards based portfolio data could demonstrate how teacher candidate performance is assessed against standards. • Aggregated data from common portfolio rubrics could show program and unit strengths and weaknesses

  4. Triangulation • Multiple assessments from internal and external sources- particularly at transition points

  5. Example: • Final internship evaluations can be conducted and comparisons drawn between evaluations by: • The teacher candidate • The mentor teacher • The supervising faculty member • Employers at the end of the first year of teaching

  6. Key Questions: • Do we have multiple sources of data for each measure (knowledge, skills, dispositions)? • Do we have an archiving system (Livetext, TK20) that supports data collection and analysis? • Do we have a culture that routinely supports data analysis for program improvement? • Do we disaggregate data to examine alternate route, off campus and distance learning programs? • Do we archive student complaints and resolutions?

  7. Georgia AFI Data Summary 2b

  8. Example #1: • Overview of an assessment system

  9. Example #2: • Systematic routines for collection, analysis and use of data

  10. Example #3: • The unit maintains its assessment system through the use of appropriate information technologies

  11. Summary 2b

More Related