1 / 16

Discovering Severity and Body Site Modifiers Dmitriy Dligach, Ph.D.

Discovering Severity and Body Site Modifiers Dmitriy Dligach, Ph.D. Boston Children’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School. Acknowledgements. Relation Extraction team: Steve Bethard Lee Becker Wei-Te Chen Guergana Savova Annotation team

stacia
Download Presentation

Discovering Severity and Body Site Modifiers Dmitriy Dligach, Ph.D.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Discovering Severity and Body Site Modifiers Dmitriy Dligach, Ph.D. Boston Children’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School

  2. Acknowledgements Relation Extraction team: • Steve Bethard • Lee Becker • Wei-Te Chen • GuerganaSavova Annotation team • David Harris, Glenn Zaramba, Donna Ihrke • Dann Albright and his team

  3. Motivation • Clinical Element Model template has attributes/modifiers for body site and severity • Critical to discover these modifiers to normalize to and populate a CEM template • Body site modifiers: • “diverticulosis of sigmoid colon” • “LUNGS: Equal AE bilaterally, no rales, no rhonchi.” • Severity: • “low-grade fever” • “severe headache”

  4. Relation Extraction • Cast as Relation Extraction for two types of UMLS relations LocationOf(Anatomical Site, Disease/Disorder) DegreeOf(Modifier, Disease/Disorder) • Example: “LUNGS: Equal AE bilaterally, no rales, no rhonchi.” LocationOf(LUNGS, rhonchi) LocationOf(LUNGS, rales)

  5. Prerequisites: Entities • LocationOf • Automatic entity discovery • cTAKES extract entities of these UMLS semantic types: • Drug • Disorder • Sign/Symptom • Procedure • Anatomical Site • DegreeOf • Modifiers • Entities

  6. Prerequisites: Modifiers • Modifier discovery module • Implemented in cTAKES • BIO (Begin, Inside, Outside) representation • Word features • Algorithm: SVM • Informal evaluation results • All automatically discovered modifiers appear to be valid

  7. Approach • Supervised learning • Input: a pair of entities • Output: relation / no relation label • Sample sentence • “LUNGS: Equal AE bilaterally, no rales, no rhonchi.” ?(LUNGS, rhonchi) ?(LUNGS, rales) ?(rales, rhonchi)

  8. Learning • Training • Pair up all entity pairs • Assign a gold relation label (including NONE) • Downsample • Train an SVM model • Testing • Pair up all entities in test set • Pass to the model • Assign label

  9. Features • Word features • Words of mentions • Context words • Distance • Named entity features • Entity types • Entity context • POS features • POS tags of entities • POS tags between entities • Dependency features • Distance to common ancestor • Dependency path features • Chunking features • Head words of phrases between entities • Phrase head context • Wikipedia features • Entity similarity • Article titles

  10. ClearTK Integration • Tutorial by Steve Bethard today • Feature extraction • Common interface for feature extractors • Many commonly used feature extractors available • Training • Commonly used machine learning packages • Training data writers • Evaluation framework • N-fold cross validation • Training and testing

  11. Gold Annotated Data • SHARP • All entity types • Total notes: 80 • Total instances of LocationOf: 1852 • Total instances of DegreeOf: 308 • ShARe (Shared Annotation Resources, PIs: Chapman, Elhadad, Savova) • Anatomical Sites and Disease/Disorders • Total notes: 130 • Total instances of LocationOf: 2190 • Total instances of DegreeOf: 702

  12. Evaluation • Two-fold cross validation • LibSVM • Linear kernel • Parameter search • Kernel (Linear/RBF) • SVM Cost parameter • RBF gamma parameter • Probability of keeping a negative example • Evaluation is on gold entities as input to the relation classifier

  13. Current Results • SHARP data • LocationOf: F1 = 0.72 • DegreeOf: F1 = 0.93 • SHARE data • LocationOf: F1 = 0.88 • DegreeOf: F1 = 0.94 • Best parameters • Linear kernel • Downsampling rate: 0.5 • Best features • Entity features • Word features

  14. Future Directions • Evaluation on a held-out test set • Evaluate on cTAKES-generated entities • Other types of relations relevant for CEM • Detailed error analysis • Release cTAKES module (July 2012) with trained models • Publish our findings

  15. Funding • The Strategic Health IT Advanced Research Projects (SHARP) Program (90TR002) administered by the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology • Integrating Informatics and Biology to the Bedside (i2b2) NCBO U54LM008748

  16. Thank you!

More Related