1 / 36

Enhancing Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Social Work and Dental Hygiene Education

Investigating students' perceptions in health issues for collaborative practice. Comparative study between Social Work and Dental Hygiene programs.

stani
Download Presentation

Enhancing Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Social Work and Dental Hygiene Education

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Social Work Curriculum Development for Service Delivery and Collaborative Multidisciplinary Practice Elaine T. Jurkowski, MSW, PhD School of Social Work Charla J. Lautar, RDH, PhD Department of Health Care Professions Tsukasa Okino, MSW Rehabilitation Institute Southern Illinois University Carbondale Carbondale, Illinois

  2. Collaboration and Partnerships • Multidisciplinary collaboration is suggested in a variety of sources including Healthy People 2010 and the Surgeon General’s Report. • Healthy People 2010 objectives related to collaboration • The Surgeon’s General 2004 “Call to Action” • Adresses health disparities through collaboration. • Views the mouth as a mirror to body

  3. Purpose - To determine if professional academic preparation makes a difference in perceptions and confidence for service delivery and collaborative interdisciplinary practice. - To investigate the differences in perceptions regarding various health issues and multidisciplinary practice among groups of social work and dental hygiene students in order to develop multidisciplinary collaboration.

  4. METHODS

  5. Sampling Frame, Subjects • Convenience sample solicited from students within the Social Work and Dental Hygiene programs at Southern Illinois University Carbondale • Students solicited for feedback during the first two weeks of classes in January, 2004 • Dental Hygiene: n=78 • Social Work: n=120 • Other: n=19

  6. Survey Instrument • Demographics • Age • Gender • Ethnicity • GPA • Major • Student status (Class)

  7. Instrument (cont.) • True/False - Yes/No Items and Open Ended Questions • Assessment, referrals and health relationships • Likert Scale Items • Questions which related to comfort level of participants • Seven items ranked from 1– 5 (not at all-very much) • Definitions • Students wrote definitions for health care providers, dental team members and professionals in the social work arena

  8. Findings

  9. Demographics of Sample • Gender: • Males: 7.9% • Females: 92.1% • Major: • Social Work 55.3% • Dental Hygiene 35.9% • Other 8.7% • Age - Mean age 24.5, Range 19-56 years

  10. Demographics (cont.) • Ethnicity • Caucasian 78.6% • African American 14.9% • Other 6.4% • Status • Sophomore 15.7% • Juniors 21.8% • Seniors 48.1% • 1st year MSW 8.8% • Graduating MSW 5.6%

  11. Demographics (cont.) • Breakdown by program • GPA • 4.0 9.7% • 3.75-3.99 17.1% • 3.5-3.74 22.1% • 3.0-3.49 27.6% • 2.75-2.99 12.9% • 2.5-2.74 6.5% • Less than 2.5 4.1%

  12. Similarities Between Groups(Undergraduate Students) Q14: If I were to receive a referral for a person who needed health care, I would be comfortable in referring him/her to a local provider for care. Mean DH= 3.71 Mean SW=3.68 Q16: If I had a client who was wheelchair bound, I would be comfortable in referring him/her to a local provider for care. Mean DH= 3.46 Mean SW=3.67 Q17: If I had a client who was an older adult, I would be comfortable in referring him/her to a local provider for care. Mean DH=3.49 Mean SW=3.83

  13. Differences Between GroupsSocial Work & Dental Hygiene

  14. Differences Between GroupsSocial Work & Dental Hygiene • Several items were seen to be perceived differently when comparing social work with dental hygiene students. • Items related to perception of general & oral health care issues, referrals, assessment and comfort levels.

  15. Differences Between Groups Social Work & Dental Hygiene • Q3: If you do not have health insurance, there are absolutely no resources for health or dental care in S. IL aside from the emergency room at the local hospital. (false=0, true=1) • Mean SW=.16 • Mean DH=.03 • T=2.98, df=189, p=.003 • Q4: There is a relationship between chronic disease and oral health. (false=0, true=1) • Mean SW=.86 • Mean DH=1.0 • T=-4.43, df=119, p=.00

  16. Differences Between Groups Social Work & Dental Hygiene • Q9a: When you conduct a patient history (i.e., social history) do you ask questions about general health history? (1=yes, 0=no) • Mean SW=.95 • Mean DH=1.0 • T=-2.5, df=116, p=.014 • Q9b: When you conduct a patient history (i.e., social history) do you ask questions about oral health history? (1=yes, 0=no) • Mean SW=.48 • Mean DH=.99 • T=-10.59, df=137, p=.00

  17. Differences Between Groups Social Work & Dental Hygiene • Q19: Routine dental exams for the screening and detection of oral cancer is important for those with and without teeth (Likert 1-5). • Mean SW=4.55 • Mean DH=4.94 • T=-4.79, df=173, p=.00 • Q20: Routine self-exams are important in the screening and detection of cancers (Likert 1-5). • Mean SW=4.65 • Mean DH=4.94 • T=3.93, df=171, p=.00

  18. Perceptions of Comfort Level • Q15: If I had a client who required oral health care, I would be comfortable in referring him/her to a local provider for care. (Likert 1-5) • Mean SW=3.53 • Mean DH=4.13 • T=-3.69, df=183, p=.000

  19. Perceptions of Comfort Level (cont.) • There were no differences in the following areas: • Referring to local providers for health care • Referring wheelchair bound individuals (Mean=3.6) • Referring older adults (Mean=3.4) • Referring homebound individuals (Mean=3.1)

  20. Open Ended Questions for Assessment • What is the purpose of a client/patient assessment when dealing with a homebound/community based individual? (Q10) • What would be an example of a question you would ask related to overall health in the assessment process? (Q11) • What would be an example of a question you would ask related to oral health in the assessment process? (Q12)

  21. Q10: What is the purpose of a client/patient assessment when dealing with a homebound/ community base individual? • Social workers are more inclined to look at needs, background information, and resources. • Dental hygienists are more specific to health and mental health.

  22. Q11: What would be an example of a question you would ask related to overall health in the assessment process? • Social work students were more likely to be interested in feelings, health history and eating. • Similarities in questions between the two groups existed between last doctor’s appointment, previous hospitalization and medications.

  23. Q12: What would be an example of a question you would ask related to dental health in the assessment process? • Dental hygienists will ask questions related to pain and self-care. • Social workers are more inclined to ask about last dental appointment and self- care.

  24. Definitions • Case Managers • Social Workers • Dental Hygienist • Physician • Primary Care Provider • Dentist

  25. Social Worker • Dental hygiene students consistently do not have any idea about what social workers actually do. • Dental hygiene students perceive a social worker’s role as “solving client problems”, while social work students perceive a social worker’s role as “counselors, case managers, advocates, providing information and assistance for assessment”.

  26. Case Managers • Dental hygiene students have a limited idea of what case managers do, however, health care management was identified in the majority of cases where a definition was provided. • Social work students view the role of the case manager as involved in assessment, health care management, and service co-ordination.

  27. Dental Hygienist • The social work students view the dental hygienists as “cleaning teeth” and dental assistants. • Dental hygiene students view their role as “educators”, health care providers or involved in the prevention of disease in addition to “cleaning teeth”.

  28. Physician • Social workers see physicians as a medical doctor, while hygienists perceive them as providing general health care.

  29. Primary Care Provider • These are seen equally as health insurance or health care providers by both groups.

  30. Dentists • Oral health care provider is perceived more so by dental hygienists. • Oral hygiene is perceived almost equally by social workers and dental hygienists, as is diagnosis and treatment. • Social workers are more inclined to perceive as providing treatment, and as a “doctor”.

  31. Roles and Responsibilities Themes from definitions of case manager social worker dental hygienist

  32. Conclusion • Findings from this study suggest that there are some similarities and differences in perceptions and confidence for service delivery for oral health issues. • If you are a hygienist vs a social worker, there are differences in how cases are assessed.

  33. Conclusions (cont.) • Need for both disciplines to understand each other’s roles and relevance as well as contribution for one’s overall health. • Need to address the roles of various health professionals.

  34. Implications for Collaboration • Need to discuss roles within different professions (i.e., oral health) throughout the practice curriculum. • Need to expose faculty and students to the range of roles that other disciplines such as the roles that dental hygienists assume. • Need to expose students to dealing with wheelchair bound and aging clients.

  35. Further Comments • Don’t perceive self as doing things you will not be able to do them. • If other health professionals are unaware of your multiple roles, they will not include you in the multidisciplinary process.

  36. Contact Information • Dr. Elaine Jurkowski • etjurkow@siu.edu • (618) 453-1200; 453-2243 • Associate Professor • School of Social Work, SIUC • M/C 4329, Carbondale, Illinois 62901

More Related