1 / 15

AASCU 2012 Academic Affairs Winter Meeting San Antonio, Texas, February 11, 2012

Shaping the Incoming Class Fosters Faculty Engagement Claudia Pinter-Lucke, AVP, Academic Programs Marten denBoer, Provost and Vice President Shanthi Srinivas, AVP, Planning, Policy & Faculty Affairs California State Polytechnic University, Pomona. AASCU 2012 Academic Affairs Winter Meeting

steel-joseph
Download Presentation

AASCU 2012 Academic Affairs Winter Meeting San Antonio, Texas, February 11, 2012

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Shaping the Incoming Class Fosters Faculty EngagementClaudia Pinter-Lucke, AVP, Academic ProgramsMarten denBoer, Provost and Vice President Shanthi Srinivas, AVP, Planning, Policy & Faculty AffairsCalifornia State Polytechnic University, Pomona AASCU 2012 Academic Affairs Winter Meeting San Antonio, Texas, February 11, 2012

  2. Transformation • From • Direct admission process • Use of minimum criteria • Sole goal - meeting enrollment FTES targets • To • Finding the “right students” in the “right place” to enhance student success

  3. Enrollment Management Then and Now Then: • Admission based on system-level criteria • All applicants who met criteria were admitted at same time • Programs with high demand could limit admissions (impaction) Automatic process with little engagement

  4. Enrollment Management Then and Now Impaction • Invoked when more applications are received than can be accommodated • Two levels • Campus Impaction • Program Impaction • Higher admission criteria (coursework, GPA, SAT) are applied • Additional information may be required

  5. Enrollment ManagementThen and Now Now: • Campus impacted • 14 programs impacted • Non-impacted programs submit suggested enrollment limits • Students admitted in waves in order of admission criteria

  6. Organizational Chart Provost & Vice President Academic Affairs Vice President Student Affairs Associate Vice President Enrollment Management & Services Associate Vice President Academic Programs Colleges Departments Admissions Registrar

  7. Differing Goals • Student Affairs • meeting system and University level goals • Academic Affairs • ensuring program and student success

  8. Role of Student Affairs, Academic Affairs, Colleges and Departments

  9. Enrollment Management as a Vehicle for Faculty Engagement Then: • Faculty’s perception that they must accommodate the students that show up Now: • Faculty’s perception that they have voice in shaping their incoming class

  10. Faculty Engagement • Nature of Engagement • Interviews with Deans, Associate Deans and Department Chairs • Examples

  11. Faculty Engagement • Lessons Learned • Know that asking for voice requires providing feedback and closing the loop • Understand the impact on the program • Ensure that discussions are occurring at the department level • Create ownership and buy-in • Key to success is communication

  12. Ideal Roles and Input From: Student Affairs HIGH Central Academic Affairs LOW Colleges, Departments LOW

  13. Ideal Roles and Input To: Central AcademicAffairs HIGH Student Affairs MEDIUM Colleges, Departments MEDIUM

  14. Persistence and Graduation 201

  15. The Future – Changing Roles • Colleges/Departments • From Observation to Voice/Influence • Academic Affairs • From Voice to Decision Making • Student Affairs • From Decision Making to Implementation

More Related