Download
1 / 61
610 likes | 623 Views
This presentation explores the use of mini-nukes in the destruction of the World Trade Center buildings on September 11, 2001. It discusses the observed phenomena, the black operation behind 9/11, and challenges the official NIST report. It also examines the theory of high-temperature cutter-charges and debunks the idea of nanothermite being responsible.
E N D
How Mini-nukes wereused to Destroy the WTC and the untold story of 9/11 Compiled by Donald Fox June 16, 2012
Bio • I’m not a nuclear physicist • IT Professional from Minneapolis, MN • Bachelor of Science in Information Technology • I study Black Ops and “Deep Politics.” • Started down the rabbit hole after watching the movie JFK in 1992 • I have been studying 9/11 since 2004 • Researching Mini-Nukes since 2006 • Followed Jim Fetzer since 2003 • Regular listener of the Real Deal and Black Op Radio
Recommended Material • Recommended Videos: 9/11 Eyewitness, 9/11 In Plane Sight and several YouTube videos • Recommended web sites: 911U.org, ae911truth.org, drjudywood.com, Finnish Military Expert and Georgia State University HyperPhysics • Fetzer and Hightower: Has nanothermite been oversold to the 9/11 Truth community? • Jeff Prager’s PDF: http://www.datafilehost.com/download-b128ac41.html
Overview • Presentation will cover how WTC1 and WTC2 were destroyed by mini-nukes. • I’m not going to get into airplanes or video fakery – these things did not cause the buildings to come down. • Fissionless fusion represents a new energy paradigm. • In a deuterium and tritium fusion reactor 1 gallon of seawater could produce as much energy as 300 gallons of gasoline
Overview • Deuterium (heavy water) is virtually unlimited: 1 part in 5000 of the hydrogen in seawater is deuterium. • Tritium is rare. No sizable natural source since tritium is radioactive with a halflife of 12.3 years. • Tritium needs to be obtained by breeding tritium from lithium
Observed Phenomena of theDestruction of WTC1 and 2 • Two 500,000 ton 110 story skyscrapers pulverized in mid-air • Extremely rapid onset of “collapse” • Destruction proceeds through path of greatest resistance at near freefall speed • 90% of the debris landed outside of the building’s footprints • No “stack of pancakes” as expected in a gravitational collapse • Buildings destroyed from the top down
Continued • Debris ejected upward and outward • One chunk of debris was ejected 603 feet from WTC1 into the Winter Garden • Pyroclastic flow and mushroom clouds • Huge explosions before each tower “collapses” • DOE report detected 55x background levels of tritium • USGS found uranium, barium, strontium and thorium among other fission products in dust samples.
9/11 Was a Black Op • A black operation or black op is a covert operation by a government, a government agency, or a military organization. By extension the term may also be used for activities by private companies or groups. A black operation typically involves activities that are highly clandestine and often outside of standard military protocol or even against the law. Key features of a black operation are that it is clandestine, it has negative overtones, and it is not attributable to the organization carrying it out. A single such activity may be called a "black bag operation".
NIST Cover Story • When a black operation is employed, a cover story is created before hand. The cover story is sent out to ”reliable” news agencies at the proper moment throughout the world. The cover story then becomes the history, a fait accompli. • The NIST Report was used to give legitimacy to the cover story that Muslim hijackers with box cutters flew commercial airplanes into the WTC causing them to collapse at free fall speed.
Could Nanothermite Turn a 500,000 Ton Building Into Dust? • Detonation velocity only 895 meters per second • Thermite is an incendiary • Thermite gets very hot, it produces molten iron, it can melt steel, and it can catch things on fire, but it is absolutely not an explosive. • 895 m/s is obviously too low of a value to account for the explosive effects observed in the catastrophic destruction of the WTC Twin Towers, including turning concrete and other materials into dust or separating and propelling steel members and other materials outward.
Steven E Jones • Promotes theory that high-temperature cutter-charges such as thermite, HMX or RDX destroyed WTC. • Denies Mini-Nukes were used to destroy the WTC • Jones earned his bachelor's degree in physics, magna cum laude, from Brigham Young University in 1973, and his Ph.D. in physics from Vanderbilt University in 1978. Jones conducted his Ph.D. research at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (from 1974 to 1977), and post-doctoral research at Cornell University and the Los Alamos Meson Physics Facility.
Jones has Extensive Nuclear Physics Background • Jones conducted research at the Idaho National Laboratory, in Arco, Idaho where, from 1979 to 1985, he was a senior engineering specialist. • He was principal investigator for experimental muon-catalyzed fusion from 1982 to 1991 for the U.S. Department of Energy, Division of Advanced Energy Projects. • From 1990 to 1993, Jones studied fusion in condensed matter physics and deuterium under U.S. Department of Energy and Electric Power Research Institute sponsorship. • Jones also collaborated in experiments at other physics labs, including TRIUMF (Vancouver, British Columbia), KEK (Tsukuba, Japan), and the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory at Oxford University
Is Steve’s Real Mission to Deny Nukes? • Promotes a theory (thermite) that cannot possibly explain what was observed on 9/11. • Has extensive background in nuclear physics and denies that nuclear weapons were used on 9/11 • “But to date, all known hydrogen bomb-explosions have been started (“ignited”) by fission bombs. Our technology is not yet sufficient to have a “pure” fusion device of any significant size – we struggle to ignite small d-t pellets in a laser-bombardmentenvironment.”
Dr. Judy Wood • Her book Where Did the Towers Go? Has caused quite a stir in the 9/11 Truth Community. • B.S. (Civil Engineering, 1981) (Structural Engineering), • M.S. (Engineering Mechanics (Applied Physics), 1983) • Ph.D. (Materials Engineering Science, 1992) from the Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg, Virginia. • Judy Wood has no theory for the destruction of the WTC: "What hypothesis, precisely, are you willing to commit yourself to at this stage of research? The hypothesis that the WTC buildings were all destroyed in a way that has never been seen before is consistent with the use of Directed Energy Weapons."
Morgan Reynolds • Morgan O. Reynolds, Ph.D., currently is Professor emeritus, economics, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas. He is a former Chief Economist at the U.S. Department of Labor 2001-2002, and he also served as the Director of the Criminal Justice Center and Senior Fellow at the National Center for Policy Analysis, headquartered in Dallas, Texas. • Protégée of Dr. Judy Wood • In a debate with Chuck Boldwyn, Morgan raised the following points: • No Audio of Big Explosions • No heat • No thermite • No nukes • Bombs don’t explode vertically • Believes that Judy Wood sees things we do not
What is a Directed Energy Weapon? • Beam Weapons, Energy Weapons, and Directed Energy Weapons (DEW):I have used the terms "beam weapons" and "directed energy weapons" to refer to unconventional weapons (exotic weapons) that are energy weapons. I broadly define DEW as Energy that is Directed and is used as a Weapon. The full range of these weapons is classified information, so I make no limits or distinction of categories within the realm of energy weapons, as doing so would imply specific knowledge of all that is available. In the following paragraph, I have listed some of the possibilities we are aware of.My critics have accused us of insisting that beam weapons did their damage from outer space, yet I make no claim about whether the directed energy weapon operated from a space-, air-, or ground-based platform. Nor do I make any claim about what wavelength(s) was used, what the source(s) of energy was, whether it involved interference of multiple beams, whether it involved sound waves, whether it involved sonoluminescence, whether it involved antimatter weapons, whether it involved scalar weapons, whether it involved HAARP (more here and here), whether it involved a nuclear process (e.g. NDEW, more info), whether it involved conventional directed energy weapons (cDEW), whether it involved improvised directed energy weapons (iDEW), nor what kind of accelerator was used, nor do I claim to know what the serial numbers of the parts that were in the weapon(s). • What I do claim is that the evidence is consistent with the use of energy weapons that go well beyond the capabilities of conventional explosives and can be directed.
Drjudywood.com FAQ 39 • The first step in a forensic investigation is to determine what happened. What happened on 9/11 is not merely a case of belief. This is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done. Until he has done that, nothing else has any scientific value. I have determined what happened; most of the buildings were turned to dust. Therefore the dust would be expected to contain traces of all materials that were in the building. Finding traces of chocolate, sugar, and nano-wheat (flour) in the dust would not prove that chocolate-chip cookies turned the buildings to dust. It would not prove there were chocolate chip cookies in the building nor that such cookies were capable of turning buildings to dust. The same is true for thermite.
What was Found in the Dust? • Uranium, Thorium, Strontium, Barium and many other fission products (telltale signs of nukes) that Jeff Prager has documented • Tritium was found by the DOE in the WTC storm sewer 3 days later and in the basement of WTC6 11 days later. Another telltale sign of nuclear fusion bombs • Undoubtedly Judy Wood is aware of the USGS and DOE findings yet she denies nukes
Limited Hangout? • A limited hangout, or partial hangout, is a public relations or propaganda technique that involves the release of previously hidden information in order to prevent a greater exposure of more important details. It takes the form of deception, misdirection, or cover-up often associated with intelligence agencies involving a release or "mea culpa" type of confession of only part of a set of previously hidden sensitive information, that establishes credibility for the one releasing the information who by the very act of confession appears to be "coming clean" and acting with integrity; but in actuality, by withholding key facts, is protecting a deeper operation and those who could be exposed if the whole truth came out. In effect, if an array of offenses or misdeeds is suspected, this confession admits to a lesser offense while covering up the greater ones.
NIST Cover Story not Holding Up • The NIST cover story is laughable. No way a puny office fire that is going out can cause a 500,000 ton building to collapse at free fall speed and eject tons of debris hundreds of yards. • Jones, Wood and Reynolds appear to be a limited hangout to protect the actual cause of the WTC’s destruction – mini-nukes. • All 3 expose SOME details of the actual 9/11 operation but none of their “theories” actually account for all of the observed phenomena.
Dr Ed Ward • The Current Irrefutable Conclusion = Treason, Murder and Crimes Against Humanity for 9-11, the Iraq War, and Revocation of Constitutional Rights of US Citizens – All US ‘representatives’ appropriate US citizens, and non citizens, need to be on trial in Constitutional Courts. • The Current ‘Basic’ Proven 9-11 Nuke Evidence – (About 95 to 98% of the TOTAL evidence covered) – All proven basic physics/chemistry ANY high school graduate should understand after the basic courses.: • 1. Three Massive WTC Craters – See us government LIDAR proof: – Nothing else known to man can leave ALL the WTC debris and this particular evidence in the length of time needed , except a third generation Micro Nuke – Mini Nuke – Nuke. It’s 100% classic textbook nuclear event residue – ZERO ANOMALIES.
3rd Generation Mini Nuke • 2. Five Acres (1.2 Billion Pounds = Weight of Residue of 3 WTC Buildings (WTC 1, 2, and 6)) of WTC Land Brought to Seering Temperatures in a Few Hours by an‘Anaerobic, Chlorine Fueled “Fire” – Impossible by Basic Laws of Physics. See usgov Thermal Images proof – Nothing else known to man can leave ALL the WTC debris and this particular evidence in the length of time needed , except a third generation Micro Nuke – Mini Nuke – Nuke. It’s 100% classic textbook nuclear event residue – ZERO ANOMALIES.http://letsrollforums.com/update-us-government-s-t22024.html?t=22024 – NOT an endorsement of the site. • 3. Tritium Levels 55 Times (normal) Background Levels assessed a numerical valueof ‘traces’ and ‘of no human concern’. See us government (DOE report) proof: – Nothing but a NUCLEAR EVENT can cause ‘tritium’ formation – basic physics fact – Nothing else known to man can leave ALL the WTC debris and this particular evidence in the length of time needed , except a third generation Micro Nuke – Mini Nuke – Nuke. It’s 100% classic textbook nuclear event residue – ZERO ANOMALIES.http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EdWard-MD/message/141 • 4. An Impossible “Fire” (Combustion Process). See Laws of Physics forFire/Combustion Process and Dr. Cahill’s data on ‘anaerobic incineration’. – Nothing else known to man can leave ALL the WTC debris and this particular evidence in the length of time needed , except a third generation Micro Nuke – Mini Nuke – Nuke. It’s 100% classic textbook nuclear event residue – ZERO ANOMALIES.rense.com/general77/newlaws.htm • 5. 3 Billion pounds of building instantly turned into 2 Billion pounds ofmicronized dust. – Nothing else known to man can leave ALL the WTC debris and this particular evidence in the length of time needed , except a third generation Micro Nuke – Mini Nuke – Nuke. It’s 100% classic textbook nuclear event residue – ZERO ANOMALIES.http://www.serendipity.li/wot/ed_ward/use_of_abombs.htm
What Is a Mini-Nuke? • 1st generation nuclear bombs were atom bombs (A-bombs). These were fission devices. Used against Japan in 1945. High radioactivity. • 2nd generation bombs were hydrogen bombs (H-bombs). These were fusion devices. Low radioactivity. Needed an A-bomb to detonate. • A mini-nuke or Tactical Nuclear Weapon is a low-yield thermonuclear device • Fissionless fusion (3rd generation) allows the size of these devices to be very small – hand grenade size
Deuterium-Tritium Fusion • The most promising of the hydrogen fusion reactions which make up the deuterium cycle is the fusion of deuterium and tritium. The reaction yields 17.6 MeV of energy but requires a temperature of approximately 40 million Kelvins to overcome the coulomb barrier and ignite it. The deuterium fuel is abundant, but tritium must be either bred from lithium or gotten in the operation of the deuterium cycle.
How Were the Twin Towers Destroyed? • Likely Scenario: 35 fissionless fusion mini-nukes placed in each tower. • Larger nukes (fission/fusion devices) in the basements. These went off first. • Devices were timed to explode from top to bottom to simulate a free fall collapse. • The Fast-Ignitor laser triggered mini-nukes blast is NOT spherical; it IS directional • Bombs were configured to explode upward so as not to destroy the device(s) a few floors beneath.
