1 / 19

FABRICIO E BALCAZAR, PhD Center on Capacity Building for Minorities with Disabilities Research

FABRICIO E BALCAZAR, PhD Center on Capacity Building for Minorities with Disabilities Research UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO. IMPROVING OUTCOMES FOR MINORITY WOMEN WITH DISABILITIES: Complex problems require complex solutions.

steve
Download Presentation

FABRICIO E BALCAZAR, PhD Center on Capacity Building for Minorities with Disabilities Research

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. FABRICIO E BALCAZAR, PhD Center on Capacity Building for Minorities with Disabilities Research UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO IMPROVING OUTCOMES FOR MINORITY WOMEN WITH DISABILITIES: Complex problems require complex solutions

  2. Prevailing approaches to school improvement do not effectively deal with factors leading to and maintaining students’ problems, specially in low-income communities of color. Starting point:

  3. Reality OF Urban Environments • Unstable neighborhoods • Over committed families (multiple jobs, multiple dependents, unemployment) • Poor housing and transportation options • Limited communication/collaboration between social service & advocacy organizations (ILC’s, VR, CBOs, schools) • Under-resourced schools • Stressed organizations have a difficult time of implementing “Best Practices” • Unfair school funding formulas (property taxes)

  4. Reality in Urban Environments (continued) • High demand on service providers contribute to • Poor person-centered planning (e.g., IEPs, ITPG’s) • Challenges of involving social support (families, peers, friends) • Challenges with collaborating with other agencies & service providers • Poor individual outcomes • Academic (i.e., schools placed on academic probation, high dropout rates, “crisis” driven intervention and support) • Transition (i.e., employment, independent living, post-secondary education)

  5. Students are unmotivated and many do not care about their education. They do not see education as a real mechanism for social mobility • Many teachers do not expect minority students with disabilities to go to college and pursue post-high school education. They do not challenge or have high expectations for these students • Most low-income minority families have similar low expectations about their children with disabilities and are unaware of VR and other college assistance programs Reality in Urban Environments (continued)

  6. Pregnancy Dropout Lower incomes than boys Low expectations from parents and teachers Dependency Low self-esteem Discrimination Issues for women with disabilities

  7. What is missing? • Direct facilitation of development and learning • Addressing contextual barriers

  8. ENABLING COMPONENT • Addressing interfering factors • Re-engaging students in classroom instruction

  9. The College Connection to Career Development and Choices in Transition Projects from UIC Projects funded by RSA and OSERS addressing interfering factors:

  10. OrganizationsCPSCCCIORS Activities Service Delivery Skills Development The College Connection to Career Development Intervention Model Outreach & Training Post-Secondary Support Job Development On-the-job Support CCC Career Dev. Office Personnel Special Education Personnel Disability Services Personnel VR Counselor UIC Case Manager UIC Case Manager UIC Case Manager UIC Case Manager • College Application • Finical Aid • Vocational Assessment • Job Shadowing • Training in goal setting • action planning and • help-recruiting • Self-Advocacy training • Tutoring • Curriculum Adaptations • Assistive technology • Problem Solving • Advocacy regarding • rights & Services • Peer Support • Job Searching • Job Interviewing • Resume writing • Job Clubs • Job Etiquette • Job Maintenance • Career Advice • Assistive Tech.

  11. What did the case managers do? • Problem solving with the students (including crisis managing) • Parents’ education and negotiation (referrals) • Classroom support, co-teaching (at high schools); visits to colleges; test preparation • Advocacy at the city colleges (dealing with teachers; accessibility); tutoring • Scheduled VR appointments with counselors; advocacy

  12. Associate’s credit (30) Office specialist (19) Pre-college credit (12) Referred to IORS for job placement (9) Pharmacy tech (6) A+ certification (5) Security training (5) Auto-mechanic program (4) CNA (4) Medical billing/coding (4) Cosmetology (3) Vocational training through Harold Washington College (3) Computer literacy (3) 4-year college (2) Radiology (2) EMT (2) Computer graphics (2) Medical terminology (2) Electronic industrial maintenance mgr. (2) Medical office specialist (2) Fiber optics, electrical classes, carpentry, sign language & PT/OT (1 each) Dropped for various reasons (8) 134 (82%) of Participants Placed in Post-Secondary Education PROGRAMS

  13. The school does not function independently of the issues of the community that surrounds it. It is an integral part and a reflection of the problems affecting the community. There is a need for comprehensive school reform that promotes school engagement in classroom instruction and deals with the multiple barriers facing low-performing youth. Conclusions

  14. The school services and supports should be coordinated with community agencies and state programs that deal with the multiple barriers that low-performing students face. Additional resources could be used to build the networks and provide the supports (comprehensive case management) that low-income students with disabilities and their families need to graduate. Conclusions (continued)

  15. We need to agree on what success means for low-income minority youth with disabilities. Graduating with low standards or aging-out is not. • There is great variability among schools, districts, and states with regards to transition preparation and outcomes. There is a need for instituting and enforcing national standards for transition planning, preparation and curricula based on specific skills and experiences that promote post-high school employment. Conclusions (continued)

  16. Adult education and certificate programs at local colleges can offer multiple career opportunities to youth with disabilities. Some of these programs could be offered while the students are still in high school, since most professional training programs have been eliminated as a result of the NCLB emphasis on meeting academic standards. Conclusions (continued)

  17. Garcia-Iriarte, E., Balcazar, F. E., & Taylor-Ritzler, T. (2007). Analysis of case managers’ support of youth with disabilities transitioning from school to work. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 26, 129-140. • McDonald, K. E., Keys, C. B., & Balcazar, F. E. (2007). Disability, race/ethnicity and gender: Themes of cultural oppression, acts of individual resistance. American Journal of Community Psychology, 39, 145-161. • National Center for Mental Health in Schools at UCLA (2008). Frameworks for systematic transformation of students and learning supports. Los Angeles, CA: Author. http://smhp.psych.ucla.edu References

More Related