90 likes | 101 Views
This survey explores how states are organizing their data systems to streamline their work on State Performance Plans across Part C and Part B indicators. It provides insights on the use of separate or single data systems, the handling of data for Part B Indicator 12, and the integration process. The survey also includes respondents' willingness to share additional information.
E N D
Data Alignment C - B State Data Systems“QuickSurvey” Results
The Survey Objective : A set of questions to find out how states are organizing their data systems to streamline their work on State Performance Plans across Part C and Part B indicators. Click here to see the survey
How Many Entities? • Of the 56 respondents, 26 were B and C data manager pairs representing 13 states • Combining the double responses, the survey results represent a total of 43 entities: 42 states and 1 jurisdiction
Lead Agency Question: Same or Separate Lead Agencies for Parts C and B?
Data Systems: Single or Separate Systems for C & B? • States with Separate agencies, single data system = NH and NC • All states with single data system have a single record data system, students have an unique identifier code, individual student records can be followed through time in the public school system
36 States w/ Separate Data Systems: How do they handle data for Part B Indicator 12?
States Working on C & B Data Systems: Where is your state in the process of integrating data systems for C & B?
Respondents Willing to Share Additional Information • Yes 47 (83.9%) • No 8 (14.3%) • No response 1 (1.8%) • Total 56 (100.0%)