230 likes | 352 Views
IMP Aerospace. Forecasting with Omega Analyzer. By: Bruce Beard, CD Senior Logistics Support Analyst 8 May 2012. IMP Aerospace, P.O. Box 970, Enfield, Nova Scotia, Canada B2T 1L5 Tel. 902. 873.2250 • Fax 902 873 2290 • e-mail. impaero@impgroup.com Website. www.impgroup.com.
E N D
IMP Aerospace Forecasting with Omega Analyzer By: Bruce Beard, CDSenior Logistics Support Analyst8 May2012 IMP Aerospace, P.O. Box 970, Enfield, Nova Scotia, Canada B2T 1L5 Tel. 902. 873.2250 • Fax 902 873 2290 • e-mail. impaero@impgroup.com Website. www.impgroup.com
IMP Aerospace LSA Engineering Section provides Logistics Engineering Business Intelligence including Spares Forecasting & Obsolescence Management to enhance the overall cost-effectiveness of their fleet.
LSA Engineering Toolkit Obsolescence Management Sparing / LORA Analysis FRACAS Management Life Cycle Cost Management Maintenance Task Rationalization Root Cause Analysis Reliability and Maintainability LSAR Database Development Demand Planning and Forecasting
Support Equipment Requirements Operations & Maintenance Requirements Transportation Requirements Logistics Support Analysis Records Facilities Considerations RAM Data Packaging & Provisioning Requirements Task Requirements Personnel Skill Considerations Functionality
Data Standardized & loaded into OmegaPS Rolling 5 years of Performa data (CF349s) LCN Structure & RAM data loaded into Analyzer Loading Analyzer – Method 1
Data is “Auto-loaded” into Analyzer format (LCN Structure, Repair Capability, TAT, MTBF, Repair Hours, etc.) 1010110011 Rolling 5 – 10 years Performa In-Service data (CF349s) Data verified - Analyzed Loading Analyzer – Method 2
Remove/Replace Time Rectification Times Repair Capability Turn Around Time MTBF Autoloader
Forecasting • Manipulate Data Points • PLT (Procurement Lead Time) • UDS (Un-Distributed Stock) • TAT (Turn Around Time) • RepCap (Repair Capability)
Forecasting • Simulation • PLT – set to ELE (Estimated Life Expectancy) in months • Simulates Obsolescence • UDS – set to Zero quantity • Simulates Stock Out condition • TAT – Actual times • Provides “real life” scenario • RepCap – From historical records • Provides “real life” scenario
What would happen if……? Improving Pipeline • Reduce TAT • “Drop ship” parts to R&O • Preposition parts at R&O • Transportation $$$ saved • Less spares required • $$$ saved
What would happen if…...? Improving Pipeline • Increase repair capability at LOMs • Less LRUs sent to R&O • Reduced shipping costs • Increase of SRUs may be required • $$$ saved
What would happen if…...? Improving Pipeline • Improve diagnostic techniques / equipment • Reduce No Fault Found equipment sent to R&O • Improves Repair Capability at MOBs • Reduces quantity of spares • $$$ saved
Option 2 Option 1 Analysis
Analysis Single Item Analysis
Analysis System Analysis
Conclusions • Developed Autoloader to input “live” data • Manipulating key data points for simulations • Improving Repair Pipeline = $$$ saved • System vs. Single Item Analysis – educated range of spares
CP140 AURORA LSAR • LCN to WUC correlation • Part Numbers / CAGE Code / NATO Stock Number • Task Codes • Candidate Items • Levels of Indenture • Source, Maintenance & Recoverability Code