1 / 16

Interpolations of Ambient Air Pollution Concentrations in Austin and Houston

Interpolations of Ambient Air Pollution Concentrations in Austin and Houston. Heather Simon. Importance of Air Pollution Monitors. Show compliance with EPA standards Alert communities if pollutant concentrations reach a level that poses an immediate risk

stormy
Download Presentation

Interpolations of Ambient Air Pollution Concentrations in Austin and Houston

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Interpolations of Ambient Air Pollution Concentrations in Austin and Houston Heather Simon

  2. Importance of Air Pollution Monitors • Show compliance with EPA standards • Alert communities if pollutant concentrations reach a level that poses an immediate risk • Provide valuable data to scientists studying air pollution chemistry

  3. TCEQ Monitoring System • 212 monitors in Texas • 63 monitors in Houston/Galveston region • Measure meteorological conditions • Wind speed • Wind direction • Solar flux • Temperature • Measure pollutant concentrations • NOx • ozone • PM2.5 • CO • SO2

  4. View of Monitoring Stations

  5. Objectives • Map pollutant concentrations for a specific air pollution episode (June 2, 2005) • Show where pollution concentrations are good/moderate/dangerous • Compare Houston to Austin • Discuss sources of pollution • Interpolate pollution data to visualize concentrations in areas other than at monitoring locations • Determine where more monitors are most needed • Locations of highest uncertainty • Locations where high uncertainties overlap for multiple pollutants • Locations where air quality is bad

  6. images of all the layers that were imported. Imported Data Layers

  7. Pollution Data

  8. Ozone Air Quality Index

  9. Ozone Concentrations

  10. Wind Data TCEQ emissions plume animation

  11. Interpolations

  12. Uncertainties

  13. Masks for Low Pollutant Areas

  14. Conclusions • Ozone did reach levels of concern in Houston • Mapping and interpolation allowed us to see a clear spatial trend in ozone concentrations • Wind data showed that most ozone in Houston originated from the industrial areas, not the urban core • Based on uncertainty in ozone interpolations, monitors should be placed to the north and southwest of the city • Since ozone concentrations are low to the southwest, first priority should be put on the northern monitors • Note of caution: conclusions drawn from a single day of data may not be universally applicable

  15. Data Sources • County, city, urban area, highway, and monitoring point layers were obtained from the Texas Natural Resource Information System. http://www.tnris.state.tx.us/DigitalData/data_cat.htm • Pollutant concentrations and meteorological data were obtained from the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. http://www.tceq.state.tx.us/cgi-bin/compliance/monops/daily_summary • Air Trajectories were obtained from the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration. http://www.arl.noaa.gov/ready/open/hysplit4.html • Air Quality Index information was obtained from the United States Environmental Protection Agency. http://airnow.gov/index.cfm?action=static.publications

  16. Acknowledgements • Dr. Maidment • GIS classmates

More Related