1 / 30

Jingjun Zhu Institute of Nuclear Science and Technology, Sichuan University, China

Electron-impact inner shell ionization cross section measurements for heavy element impurities in fusion reactors. Jingjun Zhu Institute of Nuclear Science and Technology, Sichuan University, China Research Coordination Meeting, IAEA, Vienna, 4-6 March 2009. Contents. 1. Introduction

stuart
Download Presentation

Jingjun Zhu Institute of Nuclear Science and Technology, Sichuan University, China

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Electron-impact inner shell ionization cross section measurements for heavy element impurities in fusion reactors Jingjun Zhu Institute of Nuclear Science and Technology, Sichuan University, China Research Coordination Meeting, IAEA, Vienna, 4-6 March 2009

  2. Contents • 1. Introduction • 2. Our experimental method • 3. Experiment results • 4. Summary

  3. 1 Introduction  main experimental methods: • to measure the characteristic x-rays • to measure the Auger electrons  targets:self-supporting thin targets( △E/E~0.01 ) Experimental sketch :

  4. Si(Li) detector e X-ray Thin target

  5. Problems of the self-supporting thin targets: 1) preparing the self-supporting thin targets, is the main difficulty: 20 keV electrons d= Fe: 300Å Cu: 276Å Mo: 270Å W: 179Å Pb: 166Å 30 keV electrons d= Fe: 602Å Cu: 553Å Mo: 537Å W: 351Å Pb: 330Å 2) not easy to making use of it

  6. 2. Our experimental method • Application of vacuum coating technique to prepare thin target on thick film. Advantage: easy to prepare the targets. • Detecting the characteristic x-rays by a Si(Li) detector. • However, ionization contribution in thin target by electrons reflected from the substrate must be corrected.

  7. Experimental sketch : Si (Li) detector e¯ Thin target Thick substrate

  8. Bipartition model

  9. a. Calculation of electron reflection energy spectrum: —Bipartition model Electron reflection energy spectra calculated by the bipartition model for 20 keV electrons from Mylar(solid line)and Al (dashed line)substrates. The incident angle is 45 degrees.

  10. b. Correction for multiple scattering • by Monte Carlo method d’/d: ratios of electron mean track length to straight target thickness

  11. c. Thickness measurements of thin targets • By Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometry(RBS)(The accuracy can be about 5% )

  12. RBS example: Al RBS experimental spectrum of thin Ti target on thick Al substrate and the simulation curve using GISA3.3 code. The 2 MeV 4He+ ions were impacted vertically on the target. The backscattered particles were detected at a scattering angle of 1500 by a Si surface-barrier detector.

  13. d. Efficiency calibration of Si(Li) detector: the shape of the efficiency calibration curve was determined from the ratio of experimental and theoretical thick carbon target (PENELOPE code) bremsstrahlung spectra produced by incident electrons. the absolute value for the efficiency calibration was obtained from the use of 241Am radioactive standard source.

  14. Experimental set-up for RBS

  15. Experimental set-up for ionization cross-sections

  16. 3.Experiment results 3.1 Thin target method • By using the method for thin targets on a thick substrate, we have measured the electron-impact inner-shell ionization cross sections near the threshold energies for the following elements and shells: S-K, Cl-K, Ca-K, Zn-K, W-L,L, Bi-L,L, Ba-L and Gd-L.

  17. S-K The present experimental data of K-shell ionization cross sections by electron impact for S element are compared with the results from the PWBA-C-Ex theory and the Luo and Joy’s theory as well as the results from the empirical formulae of Casnati and co-workers and of Hombourger.

  18. Cl-K E(keV) The present experimental data of K-shell ionization cross sections by electron impact for Cl element are compared with the results from the PWBA-C-Ex theory and the Luo and Joy’s theory as well as the results from the empirical formulae of Casnati and co-workers and of Hombourger.

  19. Ca-K The present experimental data of K-shell ionization cross sections by electron impact for Ca element are compared with the results from the PWBA-C-Ex theory and the Luo and Joy’s theory as well as the results from the empirical formulae of Casnati and co-workers and of Hombourger. The experimental data of Shevelko and co-workers for Ca element are also plotted for comparison.

  20. Zn-K The present experimental data of K-shell ionization cross sections by electron impact for Zn element are compared with the results from the PWBA-C-Ex theory and the Luo and Joy’s theory as well as the results from the empirical formulae of Casnati and co-workers and of Hombourger and of Gryzinski. The experimental data of Tang and co-workers for Zn element are also plotted for comparison.

  21. W-Lα,Lβ The present experimental data of Lα, Lβ x-ray production cross sections by electron impact for W element are compared with the PWBA-C-Ex theory and the experimental data of Campos et al.

  22. Bi-Lα,Lβ The present experimental data of Lα, Lβ x-ray production cross sections by electron impact for Bi element are compared with the PWBA-C-Ex theory.

  23. Ba-Lα The present experimental data of Lα x-ray production cross sections by electron impact for Ba element are compared with the PWBA-C-Ex theory.

  24. Gd-Lα The present experimental data of Lα x-ray production cross sections by electron impact for Gd element are compared with the PWBA-C-Ex theory.

  25. 3.2 Thick target method • By using the thick-target method, we measured the K-shell ionization cross sections near the threshold energies for Ni and Si element. ( Physical Review A 77, 2008, 042702 )

  26. Si-K The measured K-shell ionization cross sections for Si element by the thick-target method. The predictions of DWBA and PWBA-C-Ex theories and the values of Casnati empirical formula [18] are also shown for comparison.

  27. Ni-K The K-shell ionization cross sections for Ni element determined by the Tikhonov regularization method (circles, in red) and the classical molecular dynamics (CMD) method (triangles, in blue) for the real experimental data. The experimental data of Llovet et al (squares, in black) and the predictions of DWBA (dashed line) and PWBA-C-Ex (solid line) theories are also shown for comparison.

  28. 3.3 Effect of surface roughness • Studied using Monte Carlo simulations. • The effect of surface roughness increases as the roughness increases. • The surface roughness of the target should be limited to less than 100 nm if the experimental error originated from the surface roughness would be kept less than 2%. ( NIM B 266(23), 2008, 5037-5040)

  29. 4. Summary: • By using the method for thin targets on a thick substrate, we have measured the electron-impact inner-shell ionization cross sections near the threshold energies for the following elements and shells: S-K, Cl-K, Ca-K, Zn-K, W-L,L, Bi-L,L, Ba-L and Gd-L. • By using the thick-target method, we measured the K-shell ionization cross sections near the threshold energies for Ni and Si element. • The effect of surface roughness increases as the roughness increases and the surface roughness of the target should be limited to less than 100 nm if the experimental error originated from the surface roughness would be kept less than 2%.

  30. Thank you!

More Related