1 / 23

Argument Analysis

Argument Analysis. An argument is a set of assertions, one of which is intended to follow from or be supported by the other(s).

sue
Download Presentation

Argument Analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Argument Analysis • An argument is a set of assertions, one of which is intended to follow from or be supported by the other(s). • Gay people fall in love the same way that straight people do. And, like straights, gays often want to be with, live with, and build a life with the person they fall in love with. To say that homosexuals shouldn’t act on their desires is thus to condemn them to frustrating lives. (Stuart Rachels)

  2. Identifying Arguments • A passage contains an argument when there is an attempt to establish that a claim is true by offering reasons or evidence for its truth. • Every argument contains both a factual claim (or claims, the premises) and an inferential claim (a claim about what the facts imply, the conclusion).

  3. Argument or non-argument? • The fool has said in his heart, there is no God. (Psalms 14.1) • If God does not exist, everything is permitted. (Ivan Karamazov) • Global warming is occurring because of the burning of fossil fuels and deforestation. • You should not spank your children because fear does not promote learning.

  4. Argument Analysis • Premises: The claims that offer reasons or evidence, facts appealed to for support. • Conclusion: The claim that the premises are intended to establish. • Since the “Jim Crow” law that required blacks to sit in the back of the bus was unjust , it follows that Rosa Park’s refusal to obey it was morally praiseworthy.

  5. Signal Words • Conclusion Signals: Therefore; so; hence; thus; consequently; it follows that; accordingly; etc. • Pedophiles can’t be rehabilitated, therefore, they should not be released from prison. • Premise signals: Since; for; because; inasmuch as; etc. • Since spanking teaches children to use violence to resolve conflict, parents should not spank their children.

  6. Specific Premise Signals • Numbering devices: first, in the second place, thirdly, etc. • Cumulative devices: furthermore, moreover, in addition, also, etc. • Contrastive devices: however; nevertheless, on the contrary, etc. • In opposing prayer in public schools, I am not deserting my God. On the contrary, it is possible I am thus serving my God, who I believe wants his children to pray to him of their own freewill and not because they are forced. (P. Walker)

  7. Arguments without signals • In arguments without signal words, the inferential claim is implicit. • It is not obvious that one must be capable of being a moral agent before one can be considered an object of moral concern. We certainly consider children and the insane to fall within the scope of moral concern even though we do not hold them responsible or consider them to be moral agents. (B.E. Rollin)

  8. Argument or non-argument? • Neither a borrower nor lender be. For loan oft loses both itself and friend, and borrowing dulls the edge of husbandry. (Shakespeare) • Lying is not only saying what is not true. It is also and especially saying more than is true, and, as far as the human heart is concerned, saying more than one feels. (Albert Camus)

  9. Argument? • A person never becomes truly self reliant. Even though he deals effectively with things, he is necessarily dependent upon those who taught him so. They have selected what he is dependent upon…. (B.F. Skinner) Check it out!

  10. Arguments? • Just because one says he has a weapon... it still does not give the officers the right to use deadly force unless they can reasonably assume that deadly force is being used upon them." Jeffrey M. Galen • When a person decides to engage officers in a pursuit, refuses police  orders to end the threat they are posing to the safety of officers and the  public, tells the police that they have a gun, exits a vehicle and takes an  aggressive shooting stance, extends their arms out and points an unknown object  at the officers, they are subjecting themselves to the consequences of their  actions, which may include being shot." Tyler Izen

  11. Trayvonvs George • Zimmerman had a bloody nose, two cuts and some lumps on his head. That photographic evidence, they told the jury, was reason to believe that there had actually been a fight between Martin and Zimmerman.

  12. Prosecution Defense • "Fucking punks. These assholes, they always get away," assistant state attorney "Those were the words in that grown man's mouth as he followed in the dark a 17-year-old boy that he didn't know." • He concluded by telling the jury: "George Zimmerman did not shoot Trayvon Martin because he had to. He shot him for the worst of all reasons, because he wanted to." • The medical and scientific evidence shows that Trayvon Martin was leaning over George Zimmerman when the neighborhood watch volunteer fired the fatal shot into the unarmed teenager's chest, Dr. Vincent Di Maio, an expert testifying for the defense, gave a version of events that was consistent with the defense's theory of the deadly confrontation between them Feb. 26, 2012

  13. Incompletely Stated Arguments • Sometimes a premise or conclusion is assumed without being explicitly stated. • Here is a single conditional statement that assumes a premise and a conclusion: If you aren’t willing to steal to get into Harvard, then you should not be willing to cheat to get in. • If you tell her he is having an affair, she may end up blaming you, and you don’t want that to happen.

  14. Unexpressed Premises • Carlos won’t become a great golfer, he focuses too much on technique. • You shouldn’t use immoral means to get the things you want in life. It may come back to haunt you later. • I should spend more time studying, since it is either that or prepare myself to accept failure. • Cheating is immoral because you don’t want to live in a society of cheaters.

  15. Premise Support • Sometimes an argument contains a sub-argument to support a premise. • Capital punishment should be used only if there is no alternative means of protecting society. But life without the possibility of parole is an alternative. Keeping murderers locked securely away for life protects society as well. So, capital punishment should not be used.

  16. Casting Arguments • A method of diagramming arguments to exhibit their logical structure. • Premises may provide independent or interdependent support for the conclusion. • It is raining. You are sick. You hate Yanni. So, you should not go to the concert. • It is raining and the concert is outdoors, so it will probably be canceled.

  17. Casting Technique • Bracket each assertion. • Number each assertion. • Express the relationships between the assertions in a tree diagram, with conclusion on top. • [If you cheat on the exam you have sacrificed character for career.] (1) [You should not sacrifice character for career.] (2) [So, you should not cheat on the exam.] (3)

  18. Casting Example • [The feds raised interest rates] (1) [This means that credit card rates and mortgage rates will increase.] (2) [We can barely pay our bills as it is.] (3) You’d better find another job, dear.] 1 supports 2 2 and 3 together are needed to support 4 4 2 3 1

  19. Casting example 2 • [There is no doubt that humans commonly hallucinate.] (1) [There’s considerable doubt about whether aliens exist, abduct, or molest us.] (2) [So reports of alien abduction are probably imagined] (3) 1 and 2 together support 3 3 1 2

  20. Argument Casting • [The elusive Jesus is a standard feature in the appearance stories] 1 [Jesus is elusive] 2[because he was not flesh and blood,]3 [he was not restricted by space,] 4 [and his appearances took place over an extended period.] 5 [However, as time passed and the tradition grew, the reported appearances become more palpable, more corporeal.] 6 [They gradually lose their luminous quality and take on aspects of a resuscitated corpse.] 7 [For these reasons, the stories of the appearances need to be examined closely for clues to their history and function.] 8 (Robert Funk)

  21. Cast of Funk’s Argument 8 1 6 2 7 3 5 4

  22. Cast this! • Since murderers rarely consider the possibility of getting caught, the threat of capital punishment does not deter them. Since justice requires only that the punishment fit the crime, not that it take a specific form, capital punishment is not required by justice. And, since mandatory appeals are more costly than a life sentence, capital punishment does not save money. Capital punishment, therefore, is bad public policy.

  23. Cast the Argument • The claim that the effectiveness of prayer in medical treatment is evidence of supernatural intervention is dubious. Quiet meditation calms the patient. The belief that others care about the patient’s welfare may also reduce stress. Developing a positive, hopeful outlook improves prognosis. None of these psychological benefits of prayer requires a supernatural explanation.

More Related