1 / 11

Grand Rapids Community College Academic Governing Council

Grand Rapids Community College Academic Governing Council. General Education Distribution Task Group: An Update Steve Abid M.A., Arts & Sciences, Faculty Ric Underhile, Ph.D., Instructional Support & Interdisciplinary Studies, Associate Dean February 2013. Team members:

sumana
Download Presentation

Grand Rapids Community College Academic Governing Council

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Grand Rapids Community College Academic Governing Council General Education Distribution Task Group: An UpdateSteve Abid M.A., Arts & Sciences, FacultyRic Underhile, Ph.D., Instructional Support & Interdisciplinary Studies, Associate DeanFebruary 2013 Team members: Stephen Barton*, Jennifer Batten, Dillon Carr*, Laurie Chesley, Katie Daniels*, Roland Gani, Daniel Gelder, Jodie Gee, Nora Neil, Deb Nordman, LynnaeSelberg, Bryan Vliem *presenting today

  2. Issue • GRCC currently does not have a process to determine where a course fits into the General Education distribution system • GRCC lacks a process to determine if a course fits into the General Education distribution • The College does not articulate the learner outcomes it expects students to achieve as a result of satisfying the General Education distribution requirements

  3. Charge 1 • Establish a definition of each distribution area Completed, March 2012

  4. Charge 2 • Define the criteria that will be used in making decisions about inclusion of courses in the distribution areas

  5. Charge 2 - Criteria

  6. Charge 2 – Process • Review of new courses would occur within the New Course Approval process • Existing courses evaluated within the Course Review & Revision process • Expedited review option available upon request.

  7. Charge 3 • Articulate expectations for outcomes upon successful completion of the distribution areas

  8. Charge 3 – Outcomes A generally educated person at GRCC should: • Demonstrate basic competence in written and oral communication in English. • Demonstrate capacity to apply basic skills in scientific and quantitative reasoning, critical thinking, logic. • Express the life skills necessary for independent learning, physical wellness, and emotional wellbeing. • Describe basic tenets or ideas of scientific, historical, or social phenomena. • Describe characteristics of aesthetic and ethnical dimensions of the world.

  9. What we are asking from you • Review of criteria and outcomes to assess and provide feedback on three things: • Does the criteria and outcomes have balance between scholarly and practical? • Is there balance between breadth and specificity? • Do the criteria work in the context of general education at GRCC?

  10. What’s next? • Begin reviewing now with your departments by using criteria and outcomes as a reference point in discussions(i.e. course review, new course development, etc.) • We would like to incorporate your feedback in preparation of final draft. • Email Ric or Steve with feedback by March 15th

  11. Lessons Learned • Make General Education relevant to daily work • Need to balance our concerns here at GRCC with our closest transfer institutions • Emphasis on how courses achieve Gen Ed outcomes (professional development), rather than could courses do so. • Help faculty identifyways their courses intersect with General Education outcomes at GRCC

More Related