160 likes | 168 Views
This study examines the environmental impacts of temporary closure of inactive oil and gas wells and explores the real options available to operators, such as reactivation or abandonment. It assesses the risks of gas migration and drinking water contamination, as well as the management of Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material (NORM). The research draws on the works of Brennan and Schwartz (1985), Paddock Siegel and Smith (1988), Dixit and Pindyck (1994), Slade (2001), Mason (2001), Moll (2001), Moel and Tufano (2002) to evaluate the economic costs and benefits associated with each option.
E N D
Avoiding Environmental Remediation Through “Temporary” Closure Lucija Muehlenbachs University of Maryland
Alberta: 350,273 oil and gas wells 42,000 are inactive Texas: 354,616 oil and gas wells 114,259 of which are “shut-in, depleted and are not expected to produce another barrel of oil”
Environmental Impacts Gas migration Drinking water contamination Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material
Real Options in Natural Resources Brennan and Schwartz (1985) Paddock, Siegel and Smith (1988) Dixit and Pindyck (1994) Slade (2001) Mason (2001) Moll (2001) Moel and Tufano (2002)
Option to Abandon Option to Reactivate
Maintenance Cost Option to Abandon Option to Reactivate
Value of Abandoning Or Mothballing