340 likes | 363 Views
This document presents the updated results of the Rate Impact Task Force's report to the SPP Regional State Committee, including cost forecasts, customer considerations, and detailed financial analyses. It covers the impacts on various customer types, net costs, benefits, and differential analyses, with a focus on the 2017 projections.
E N D
11/30/2010 DRAFT Rate Impact Task Force’s Updated Resultsfor it’s Report to the SPP Regional State Committee
Updates Since Oct 13, 2010 Presentation • ATRR Zonal Cost Forecast Updated: • New Costs (PP and BP, $327M total increases) • Updated In-Service Dates • Re-calculated BP Transfers: $64M/yr from $31.2M/yr • Costs Updated in Each Zone’s Results
Differential Analysis of New v. Old Forecast2017Differential = Change - Base
Differential Analysis of New v. Old Forecast2017Differential = Change - Base
New Zonal Results Presented • Sunflower Electric Power Corporation • City Utilities of Springfield Missouri • Mid-Kansas Electric Company • Western Farmers Electric Cooperative
Rate Impact Task Force Results • Four Types of Customers Considered • 1,000 kWh/mo residential • 4,000 kWh/mo small commercial • Actual average residential • Actual average small commercial
Rate Impact Task Force Results, cont. • Monthly Incremental Cost Impact of Investment by Customer Rate Type Determined, 3% Straight Line Depreciation and Balancing Transfers Included • Selected Quantitative Monthly Benefits Impact by Customer Rate Type Used to Off-Set Costs • Monthly Rate Incremental Impact by Customer Rate Type Determined • Focus: 2017, Typical Peak Cost Year
Detailed Results by Type • For Each Customer Type, “All-In-One” Graphs are Presented: • Monthly Cost Incremental to Current Bill (Red Bar) • Monthly Benefits Offset Cost (Green Bar) • Monthly Net Impact Incremental to Current Bill (Orange Bar with $/Month Value)
Detailed View of Each Result • For Each Customer Type by Zone • 1000 kWh/mo Fixed Residential • 4000 kWh/mo Fixed Small Commercial • Actual Average Residential • Actual Average Small Commercial • Each Result by Zone • Cost • Benefit • Net
Benefits Results, 1,000 kWh/mo Residential, Shown as Negative Costs
Differential Analysis of CWIP v. AFUDC • Base: AFUDC instead of CWIP • Change: CWIP • Differential = Change – Base • AFUDC revenue requirement calculated by multiplying the Average Annual CWIP balance by the Weighted Average Cost of Capital • CWIP revenue requirement calculated by multiplying the Average Annual CWIP balance by the Weighted Average Cost of Capital plus Taxes on CWIP • Note: CWIP is included in the cost forecast but did not effect the 2017 results because the last CWIP payment is scheduled in 2014
CWIP Cost Allocation per Year, 2009-2014As Reported by ITC and Prairie Wind
Pat Bourne Director - Transmission Policy pbourne@spp.org 501-614-3249 Dan Jones, PE Lead Regulatory Engineer djones@spp.org 501-688-1717 Dee Edmundson Engineer I dedmunson@spp.org 501-688-1778 34