1 / 31

SETI Search for Extra Terrestrial Intelligence

SETI Search for Extra Terrestrial Intelligence. FYOS Lecture 8. History. Guglielmo Marconi (1874-1937) 1 st cross-Atlantic radio communication Nikola Tesla (1856-1943) inventor of AC current

swann
Download Presentation

SETI Search for Extra Terrestrial Intelligence

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SETISearch for Extra Terrestrial Intelligence FYOS Lecture 8

  2. History • Guglielmo Marconi (1874-1937) • 1st cross-Atlantic radio communication • Nikola Tesla (1856-1943) • inventor of AC current They both claimed to hear a radio signal from alien worlds. In fact, they both heard atmospheric “whistlers” In 1924, when the Mars was close to Earth, a large campaign to hear a signal from Mars…  Destined to fail. Why?

  3. Ionosphere acts as a mirror for radio waves…

  4. Whistler • Hearing distant lightnings!

  5. Modern Approach • Cocconi and Morrision at Cornell calculated in 1959 that it is possible to send radio signals b/w stars even with the technology of 50s… • Galaxy is quite old  must be more advanced civilizations than us in the Galaxy  they may send “hailing signals” to other stars very easily! ? which radio frequency ?

  6. Choice of Frequency • Neutral Hydrogen gas produces a 1420 MHz (21cm) wave  natural static radio noise… • Uniqueness of this frequency : Hydrogen is the most common element in the Universe, hence any astronomers in advanced civilizations would use this frequency to study Galaxy!

  7. Modern SETI • Cocconi and Morrison persuaded fellow radio astronomers but no positive response. • In 1960, Frank Drake independently arrived at a similar conclusion and performed a week-long search for alien signals at two stars (εEri and τCeti)  caught the attention of the astronomy community. • NASA started a dedicated program which finally started its operation in 1992. In 1993, the program got canceled by the U.S. Congress.

  8. Categories of Signals • In Frank Drake’s 1960 experiment: searched for an “intentional” signal sent to us: an interstellar hailing signal. Three possible types of alien signals • intentional signal beacons. • aliens’ local communication. • e.g., our own radio and TV signals • alien world’s inter-planetary or interstellar communication. • our communication signals with interplanetary spacecrafts (e.g., Voyager)

  9. Can aliens detect our leaked signals? • Our signal has no intended direction  to reach out to many homes… • Because of the inverse square law, the signal gets weaker very quickly… • With the technology similar to ours, our leaked signal can be detected only about one light-year away from Earth! • The nearest star is 4 light-years away… • This means that we can’t detect alien’s local communication signals (unless they use much stronger signal) We can detect only an intended signal from aliens at this point.

  10. Format of Signal • Intended messages should be easy to decipher…  what communication protocol? • In the movie , “Contact”, Carl Sagan suggested that aliens may use our leaked TV broadcast as a clue embedded in their message… But, our signal reaches only 50 light-years… We sent out a radio signal using the world’s largest antenna (Arecibo) in 1974 toward M13!

  11. Arecibo 1974 signal 1,679 bits in a 3-minute message  1,679 = a multiple of two prime numbers (23, 73). • alien needs to know that the message was a 23x73 image… • single transmission

  12. Even if we detect an alien signal, we may never decode it!

  13. How to decipher?!? • Arecibo message deciphered as 73x23 image…

  14. Difficulties with Radio SETI • Two challenges • No dedicated search telescope  all SETI programs so far had to compete for telescope times against other traditional astronomy research projects… • terrestrial interferences • TV broadcasts • Radio stations • Radars • etc. • exactly the types SETI look for! Build a telescope on the far-side of the Moon!?

  15. Current Radio SETI • SETI institute  350 6-m radio telescopes near Berkeley… • 450 million channels • 70 megawatts from 100 lightyears away.

  16. Current Radio SETI • UC Berkeley • SERENDIP – “piggyback” • 168 million channels 1 megawatt SETI@Home (2-3% of data)

  17. Current Radio SETI • Southern SERENDIP • Parkes 64m telescope in Australia • 58 million channels, 1 megawatt

  18. Current Radio SETI • SETI Italia • 32m Medicina telescope • 24 million channels • 30 megawatts

  19. So, any detected signal so far? Anything interesting?

  20. Active SETI • sending a message to aliens = Messaging to Extra Terrestrial Intelligence (METI) • Is it safe to send a message to aliens??

  21. Optical SETI history • C. Townes invented a LASER in 50s • In 1961, Schwartz and Townes published a science article “Interstellar and Interplanetary Communication by Optical Masers” in Nature. • Then, Project Cyclops in 70s shadowed the Optical SETI… (diameter = 16km)

  22. Beamed versus Omni-directional versus At 100 Ly away with an Arecibo-like receiver: omni-directional signal requires to be 66,000 MW, while a beam signal to be only 0.0033MW.

  23. Optical SETI • High intensity pulsed laser beam from an alien who knows that we are here! • Highly beamed laser beam can outshine the host star by 1000+ times!! • No human interference!!

  24. With 10m telescopes on both ends… • Can send a high quality signal (large amount of info) out to ~1,000 light-years with our 21C Earth laser technology already!

  25. On-going Optical SETI • UC Berkeley: Lick observatory (1.2m telescope)

  26. On-going Optical SETI • Harvard Univ. funded by Planetary Society • Some collaboration with Princeton Univ. • 3 OSETI projects • 1.5m telescope

  27. On-going Optical Search • Columbus (Ohio) Optical SETI by Stuart Kingsley (Amateur Astronomer) • Using off-the-shelf instruments… (10inch reflector Meade)

  28. Advantages of OSETI over Radio SETI • Visible light-emitting devices are smaller and lighter than microwave or radio-emitting devices. • Visible light-emitting devices produce higher bandwidths and can consequently send information much faster. • less Interference than radio • Naturally occurring nanosecond pulses of light are nonexistent. • unlike in microwave and radio SETI, searching for an exact frequency is not vital because the expected transmitting beam should outshine the unfiltered light from the star by at least 30 times.

  29. Next Week : SETI debate… • Read two articles before you come to the class…

More Related